Forces acting on two blocks stacked one on another

In summary, the conversation is about solving a physics problem involving two blocks of different masses and a horizontal force applied to one of the blocks. The conversation includes a discussion of finding the normal force and friction force between the blocks, as well as a free body diagram and applying Newton's laws to find the acceleration of the blocks.
  • #1
Siracuse
23
0

Homework Statement


I'll describe this without the numbers, values and such. The issue here is to understand the logic worked on this problem...well any problem is like that. Anyhow, this is the situation:

A block of mass m1 is stacked on the surface of another block of mass m2 of width L, where m2>>m1. There is kinetic friction between those two blocks, static friction coefficient is not given. Block m2 is on a frictionless surface. An horizontal, constant force F is applied on block m1. The whole system of blocks moves.

Homework Equations



Sum of forces in x,y components;

The Attempt at a Solution



First thing: since there is a friction force, calculating the normal force in this case is important. For block m1,

Fn_m1 - Fg_m1 + Fn_m2 = 0 -> Fn_m1 = Fg_m1 - F_m2;

For block m2,

Fn_m2 - Fg_m1 - Fg_m2 = 0 -> Fn_m2 = Fg_m1 + Fg_m2;

The rest should just involve basic algebra, to obtain Fn_m1 and, therefore, the value of the kinetic friction force.

Now, to work on the second part, the x-axis. Block m1:

F - F_kin = m.a

For block m2...here's where I think I don't know what I am doing. The picture of my Halliday book shows block m2 moving, so what kind of forces are acting on m2 in the x-axis? Is there a resulting force derived from the friction between the blocks? I've thought about this for a while and I'm just clueless. Not even sure if my logic for the forces on the y-axis is correct...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Siracuse said:

Homework Statement


I'll describe this without the numbers, values and such. The issue here is to understand the logic worked on this problem...well any problem is like that. Anyhow, this is the situation:

A block of mass m1 is stacked on the surface of another block of mass m2 of width L, where m2>>m1. There is kinetic friction between those two blocks, static friction coefficient is not given. Block m2 is on a frictionless surface. An horizontal, constant force F is applied on block m1. The whole system of blocks moves.


Homework Equations



Sum of forces in x,y components;

The Attempt at a Solution



First thing: since there is a friction force, calculating the normal force in this case is important. For block m1,

Fn_m1 - Fg_m1 + Fn_m2 = 0 -> Fn_m1 = Fg_m1 - F_m2;
no, when you look at the forces acting on m1 inthe vertical direction, using a free body diagram, there are 2 forces acting: its weight down, and the normal force of m2 on m1, acting up. You've got an extra term in there.

For block m2,

Fn_m2 - Fg_m1 - Fg_m2 = 0 -> Fn_m2 = Fg_m1 + Fg_m2;
this is actually based on a FBD of both blocks together, and gives the correct value of Fn_m2

The rest should just involve basic algebra, to obtain Fn_m1 and, therefore, the value of the kinetic friction force.
yes, using the correct value for Fn_m1

Now, to work on the second part, the x-axis. Block m1:

F - F_kin = m.a
yes, correct

For block m2...here's where I think I don't know what I am doing. The picture of my Halliday book shows block m2 moving, so what kind of forces are acting on m2 in the x-axis? Is there a resulting force derived from the friction between the blocks? I've thought about this for a while and I'm just clueless. Not even sure if my logic for the forces on the y-axis is correct...
Yes, draw a FBD of block 2. What force acts on m2 in the x direction (HINT: use your results from the FBD of block m1, and Newton 3).
 
  • #3
PhanthomJay said:
no, when you look at the forces acting on m1 inthe vertical direction, using a free body diagram, there are 2 forces acting: its weight down, and the normal force of m2 on m1, acting up. You've got an extra term in there.

this is actually based on a FBD of both blocks together, and gives the correct value of Fn_m2

yes, using the correct value for Fn_m1

yes, correct

Yes, draw a FBD of block 2. What force acts on m2 in the x direction (HINT: use your results from the FBD of block m1, and Newton 3).

Okay, for m1 in y-axis, it'd be: Fn_m2 = Fg_m1, since the only normal force here is coming from the other block.
As for m2, I don't really see why the forces drawn in a FBD for m2 for it don't match for my equation. There is the weight force from m1, and from m2 acting on it downwards and the normal force from the surface.

For m2's forces in the x-axis, after some thinking, this is what I came up with: the friction force in m1 is a reaction against a force applied in m2. Therefore, for block m2,

F_d = m.a, where F_d = F_kin in absolute values. Force F can't be drawn here, it was applied on block m1 only.
 
  • #4
Siracuse said:
Okay, for m1 in y-axis, it'd be: Fn_m2 = Fg_m1, since the only normal force here is coming from the other block.
Okay there's a lot of subscripts here that lead to confusion, suffice to say that the normal force of m2 on m1 acts upward on m1 and is equal to the weight of blocK m1.
As for m2, I don't really see why the forces drawn in a FBD for m2 for it don't match for my equation. There is the weight force from m1, and from m2 acting on it downwards and the normal force from the surface.
when you draw a FBD of m2, there are 3 forces acting on m2 in the vertical direction: The weight force of m2, the normal force upward from the surface, and the normal force downward from m1 on m2. The weight of m1 does not enter into the FBD of m2, although it happens in this problem to be the same as the normal force acting downward from m1 on m2.

For m2's forces in the x-axis, after some thinking, this is what I came up with: the friction force in m1 is a reaction against a force applied in m2. Therefore, for block m2,

F_d = m.a, where F_d = F_kin in absolute values. Force F can't be drawn here, it was applied on block m1 only.
yes, correct, but be sure in your FBD of m2 that your equation reads F_kin = m2a2, and note that a2 is not the same as a1, I'm not sure if this is clear to you, is it?
 
  • #5
PhanthomJay said:
Okay there's a lot of subscripts here that lead to confusion, suffice to say that the normal force of m2 on m1 acts upward on m1 and is equal to the weight of blocK m1.
when you draw a FBD of m2, there are 3 forces acting on m2 in the vertical direction: The weight force of m2, the normal force upward from the surface, and the normal force downward from m1 on m2. The weight of m1 does not enter into the FBD of m2, although it happens in this problem to be the same as the normal force acting downward from m1 on m2.

yes, correct, but be sure in your FBD of m2 that your equation reads F_kin = m2a2, and note that a2 is not the same as a1, I'm not sure if this is clear to you, is it?

Alright got it. As for the last line, I can understand that a2 << a1, because, in this case m1<<m2, and F (force applied on m1) >> F_kin. A force of small magnitude on a block of great mass accelerates the block at a much slower rate than a block of small mass pushed by a force of great magnitude.
 

1. What is the relationship between the weight of the top block and the bottom block in a stacked block scenario?

The weight of the top block exerts a downward force on the bottom block, which in turn exerts an equal and opposite upward force on the top block. This is known as Newton's Third Law of Motion.

2. How does friction play a role in the forces acting on stacked blocks?

Friction between the two blocks can affect the forces acting on them. If the surface of the blocks are rough, friction can prevent the top block from sliding off the bottom block. If the surface is smooth, there may be less friction and the top block may be more likely to slide off.

3. Are there any other forces acting on the stacked blocks besides weight and friction?

Aside from weight and friction, there may also be normal forces acting on the blocks. Normal force is the force exerted by a surface on an object in contact with it, and in this case, it is the force of the bottom block pushing up on the top block.

4. How does the acceleration of the stacked blocks change if the mass of the top block is increased?

If the top block's mass is increased, the weight of the top block will also increase, leading to a greater downward force on the bottom block. This will result in a greater normal force pushing up on the top block, causing a larger acceleration of the stacked blocks.

5. How do the forces acting on the stacked blocks change if the surface between them is inclined?

If the surface between the stacked blocks is inclined, the normal force will act at an angle instead of being directly upwards. This will result in a smaller normal force and therefore a smaller acceleration of the stacked blocks. Additionally, the force of friction may also change due to the angle of the incline, affecting the overall forces acting on the blocks.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
403
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
925
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
856
Back
Top