So what's the deal with Majorana, Weyl, and Dirac particles in N dimensions?

In summary, Dirac fermions transform as a faithful representation of the Lorentz group when the Complex extension of the Lie algebra is not simple.
  • #1
arivero
Gold Member
3,429
140
Amusingly, a search on these three words here in PF does not show a lot of postings, so I am creating this thread so you can ask all your doubts about N-dimensional Majorana, Weyl and Dirac particles, their representations, their Lagragians, masses, and whatever you have always wanted to know :tongue:

We have spoken previously of it early this year here
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=378170&highlight=majorana+Weyl+Dirac
A couple years ago here, relating to SUSY!
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=242313&highlight=Majorana+Weyl+Dirac
and five years ago here
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=89846&highlight=Majorana+Weyl+Dirac
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
A first question I am interested on, is when do we start to need Grassman Variables. It seems that we don't need it to write explicitly the Dirac equation, nor the Majorana ones. But reading Peskin, it invokes them already when using a Lagrangian for Majorana.
 
  • #3
Other issue to address: In Dirac fermions, we are usually told about the limits when c goes to infinity (so classical quantum mechanics with spin 1/2 particles), when mass goes to zero (so it dividis in Weyl spinors) and even when mass is, if not infinite, a lot greater than the energy eigenvalue, and then we see the distinction between two "particle" degrees of freedom and two "antiparticle" states.

What about all of these in Majorana particles. In fact, do Majorana particles have negative energy eigenstates?
 
  • #4
Maybe nice to post some of the relations I found, for example this
one yielding the symmetric electromagnetic stress energy tensor:

If we apply the generator of general Lorentz transformations to
a Dirac field, using the definitions:

[tex]\varphi' ~=~ {\cal F}^\mu_{~\nu}\,\varphi ~=~ \left(\,\vec{E}\cdot\hat{\mathbb{K}} + \vec{B}\cdot\hat{\mathbb{J}}\,\right)\varphi
[/tex]


Where J is the rotation generator, K is the boost generator, E and
B are the electromagnetic field and F is the spinor version of the
electromagnetic field tensor.

The (five) Dirac bilinear fields all yield the stress energy tensor T:

[tex]
\begin{aligned}
&\bar{\varphi}'\gamma^\mu\varphi' &=~~~ &\tfrac12\,T^\mu_{~\nu}~\bar{\varphi}\,\gamma^\nu\varphi \\
&\bar{\varphi}'\gamma^5\gamma^\mu\varphi' &=~~~ &\tfrac12\,T^\mu_{~\nu}~\bar{\varphi}\,\gamma^5\gamma^\nu\varphi \\
&\bar{\varphi}'~\mathbb{K}^\mu\,\varphi' &=~~~ &\tfrac12\,T^\mu_{~\nu}~\bar{\varphi}\,\mathbb{K}^\nu\,\varphi \\
&\bar{\varphi}'~\mathbb{J}^\mu\,\varphi' &=~~~ &\tfrac12\,T^\mu_{~\nu}~\bar{\varphi}\,\mathbb{J}^\nu\,\varphi \\
\end{aligned}
[/tex]

The first two are the vector and axial vector representing the
four-current and four-spin of the transformed field. The third
and fourth are mixed quantities which contain the remaining fields.
We extend K and J to 4 components for convenience as follows:

[tex]
\mathbb{K}^\mu ~=~ -\tfrac12\,\gamma^\mu\gamma^o, ~~~~~~~~~~ \mathbb{J}^\mu ~=~ \tfrac{i}{2}\,\gamma^5\gamma^\mu\gamma^o
[/tex]


The zero'th component of K yields the scalar and the zero'th
component of J yields the pseudo scalar. the spatial components
of J produce the half of the tensor which represents the magneti-
zation
of the Dirac field while those of K yield the other half of the
tensor which represents the polarization of the field (zero at rest).


Regards, Hans
 
  • #5
Hello Hans,

I was not thinking -yet- on the Electromagnetic field, nor its duality properties etc. But your comment remembered me of a footnote in Sakurai's "Advanced Quantum Mechanics"
 

Attachments

  • sakurai.png
    sakurai.png
    46.7 KB · Views: 743
  • #6
arivero said:
Other issue to address: In Dirac fermions, we are usually told about the limits when c goes to infinity (so classical quantum mechanics with spin 1/2 particles), when mass goes to zero (so it dividis in Weyl spinors) and even when mass is, if not infinite, a lot greater than the energy eigenvalue, and then we see the distinction between two "particle" degrees of freedom and two "antiparticle" states...

All three types of fermions transform as definite representations of the Lorentz group SO(3,1). Both Weyl and Majorana fermions take advantage of a very peculiar and strange property of the Lorentz group. This is because the Complex extension of the Lie algebra associated with SO(3,1) is not simple. It decomposes into a direct sum of the algebras of of SO(3) and SO(2,1). But if you keep everything real and don't do the complex extension, the algebra of SO(3.1) is simple (and the real SO(3.1) is a simple group.) This creates the following unusual situation. The representations of SO(3,1) can be labelled by two indices (corresponding to the Complex direct sum.) The smallest representation of SO(3) and SO(2,1) are both two dimensional. It turns out that both Weyl and Majorana Fermions transform by the (chiral) representation (1/2, 0) (say for left handed fermions.) This is a representation of the Lorentz group, but it is not a faithful representation. The same thing can be said for the other chiral representation (0, 1/2). But then the amazing (to me) fact takes over: the direct sum of two unfaithful representation is a faithful one namely : (1/2, 0) + (0, 1/2). That's what the Dirac Fermions transform as. Of course you need terms in the Lagrangian that couple (1/2, 0) and (0, 1/2) to each other. These require either scalar (or pseudo scalar) or second order antisymmetric tensor couplings for Dirac and Weyl fermions (the vector and axial vector couplings allowed by Lorentz group never mix the two.) The mass term in Dirac equation is the scalar term that does that. This is why we can view (in some sense) that in the limit of of zero mass, Dirac fermions reduce to a pair of Weyl (or Majorana) fermions. Because the Lagrangian does not couple the two components of the representation to each other. (Assuming no tensor couplings which seem not to be present. If there were tensor couplings, it would be a different story.) For Majorana fermions, the (real restricted) representation (1/2, 0) can couple to itself to form a scalar, and thus provide a mass term (which however violates Fermion number.)

As a side note, I will mention the point that the defining (real) four dimensional representation of the Lorentz group is (1/2, 1/2) and it is irreducible. It can couple (as vector or axial vector) to Weyl fermions, or to either (or both) component of the Dirac Fermions (but not to Majorana.)
 
  • #7
SO(3) and SO(2,1)?! I thought we usually dealt with SU(2) x SU(2)? And depending on which of the SU(2) the field transforms non-trivially under, we get either a left handed or right handed chiral field.
 
  • #8
TriTertButoxy said:
SO(3) and SO(2,1)?! I thought we usually dealt with SU(2) x SU(2)? And depending on which of the SU(2) the field transforms non-trivially under, we get either a left handed or right handed chiral field.

The SO(3) algebra is isomorphic to the SU(2) algebra. (But the groups are not isomorphic differing by a factor of Z2.) Non-compact SO(2,1) and SU(1,1) algebras are also the same, if you use the complex extensions. So, once you allow the complex algebras, everything is the same. I prefer SO(3) and SO(2,1) because you can keep everything real for whatever it is worth. Likewise working with SU(2) is just fine.
 

1. What is the difference between Majorana, Weyl, and Dirac particles?

Majorana, Weyl, and Dirac particles are all types of fermions, which are subatomic particles that make up matter. The main difference between them lies in their properties, such as their spin and charge. Majorana particles are their own antiparticles and have a neutral charge, while Weyl particles have half-integer spin and no antiparticle counterparts. Dirac particles have integer spin and can have both matter and antimatter forms.

2. What is the significance of Majorana, Weyl, and Dirac particles in physics?

Majorana, Weyl, and Dirac particles play important roles in understanding the fundamental laws of physics. They have unique properties that have led to advancements in areas such as quantum mechanics, particle physics, and condensed matter physics. Studying these particles can also provide insights into the nature of the universe and the fundamental forces that govern it.

3. Is there any experimental evidence for the existence of Majorana, Weyl, and Dirac particles?

Yes, there is experimental evidence for the existence of all three types of particles. The first experimental evidence for Majorana particles was found in the 1930s in the form of neutrinos. Weyl particles were first observed in high-energy particle accelerators in the 1980s. Dirac particles have been observed in various experiments, such as the discovery of the Higgs boson in 2012.

4. How do Majorana, Weyl, and Dirac particles differ from other types of particles?

Majorana, Weyl, and Dirac particles are all fermions, which means they follow the Pauli exclusion principle and have half-integer spin. This sets them apart from bosons, which have integer spin. Additionally, Majorana particles are unique in that they are their own antiparticles, while Weyl particles have no antiparticle counterparts.

5. How are Majorana, Weyl, and Dirac particles used in modern technology?

Majorana, Weyl, and Dirac particles have potential applications in quantum computing and spintronics, which utilize the spin of particles for information storage and processing. Weyl particles have also been studied for their potential use in topological insulators, which are materials that have unique electronic properties that can be useful in electronics and energy applications.

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • General Math
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Math Proof Training and Practice
2
Replies
67
Views
10K
Replies
330
Views
131K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top