| New Reply |
Any particular way to factor? |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Mar22-13, 12:05 AM | #1 |
|
|
Any particular way to factor?
I'm factoring some equations and the way I do it seems correct and Wolfram often lists my way of factoring it but it's like the 5th or 6th one down.
Just wondering if it's like fractions where the best answer is the lowest the fraction can be reduced to. For example I say that: [tex]3a+6a^2+15a^3 = 3a(1+2a+5a^2)[/tex] Wolfram doesn't list my way of factoring it when I input the equation to be factored, but I know it's correct because when I input my factored form instead of the original problem, it lists the original problem as a solution. Any particular way to be factoring these? Like highest exponenets first, not using 1 ect? |
| Mar22-13, 07:24 AM | #2 |
|
|
|
| Mar22-13, 09:54 AM | #3 |
|
Blog Entries: 2
|
|
| Mar22-13, 10:07 AM | #4 |
|
|
Any particular way to factor?
What I mean is which is prefered?
Are these all completely 100% equivalent or would an examiner prefer to see a certain layout? |
| New Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Any particular way to factor?
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Lorentz factor and Bondi factor | Special & General Relativity | 4 | ||
| Factor a in Van der Waals equation of state off by a factor of 0.1? | Classical Physics | 0 | ||
| Factor This | Precalculus Mathematics Homework | 3 | ||
| Utility of Form factor and Crest factor in an AC waverform | Classical Physics | 2 | ||
| Q factor (Quality Factor) | Introductory Physics Homework | 2 | ||