Exploring Peskin & Schroeder's QFT Propositions on p. 166

In summary, Peskin and Schroeder state that in high energy Compton scattering, one unit of spin angular momentum is converted to one unit of orbital angular momentum, and after the collision, one unit of spin angular momentum is lost. The emergence of orbital angular momentum is not physically interpreted, but the final state is a p-wave, which is related to the conservation of angular momentum.
  • #1
gremezd
18
0
It would be nice if someone commented a couple of propositions by Peskin and Schroeder in their QFT book in p.166.

There they say that when the helicity is conserved in the high energy Compton scattering, one unit of spin angular momentum is converted to one unit of orbital angular momentum. From the picture in p.166 it is quite obvious that after the collision one unit of spin angular momentum is lost. However, how do we physically interpret the emergence of orbital angular momentum? Do particles begin to orbit?

In the same page it is argued that the final state is a p-wave and that it is somehow related to the conservation of angular momentum. What do they mean by that? And what is a p-wave in this context?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


gremezd said:
It would be nice if someone commented a couple of propositions by Peskin and Schroeder in their QFT book in p.166.

There they say that when the helicity is conserved in the high energy Compton scattering, one unit of spin angular momentum is converted to one unit of orbital angular momentum. From the picture in p.166 it is quite obvious that after the collision one unit of spin angular momentum is lost. However, how do we physically interpret the emergence of orbital angular momentum? Do particles begin to orbit?

In the same page it is argued that the final state is a p-wave and that it is somehow related to the conservation of angular momentum. What do they mean by that? And what is a p-wave in this context?
p-wave = polarized wave; in this case I assume it's circular polirized.
 
  • #3


I can provide some insight and clarification on the propositions mentioned in Peskin and Schroeder's QFT book on p. 166.

Firstly, the conservation of helicity in high energy Compton scattering refers to the conservation of the projection of the particle's spin along its direction of motion. In this process, there is a transfer of energy and momentum between a high-energy photon and a particle, such as an electron. The conservation of helicity means that the total spin projection before and after the collision remains the same.

The statement about the conversion of one unit of spin angular momentum to one unit of orbital angular momentum is referring to the fact that in high energy Compton scattering, the final state particles can have orbital angular momentum in addition to their spin. This is because the particles are in motion and can have a non-zero angular momentum due to their motion around the center of mass of the system. This is a consequence of the conservation of total angular momentum in the system.

In terms of physical interpretation, the emergence of orbital angular momentum does not necessarily mean that the particles begin to orbit. It simply means that the particles have additional angular momentum due to their motion in the system. This can be visualized as a spinning top, where the top's spin is its intrinsic angular momentum and the motion around its axis of rotation is the orbital angular momentum.

The statement about the final state being a p-wave is related to the angular momentum of the system. In quantum mechanics, particles can have different wave functions, which can be described by different quantum numbers. The p-wave refers to the wave function of the particles having a non-zero orbital angular momentum, specifically, a value of 1. This is related to the conservation of angular momentum, as mentioned earlier.

In summary, the propositions mentioned on p. 166 in Peskin and Schroeder's QFT book describe the conservation of angular momentum and the emergence of orbital angular momentum in high energy Compton scattering. These concepts are key in understanding the behavior of particles at high energies, and they have been extensively studied and confirmed through experiments.
 

1. What are the main propositions discussed in Peskin & Schroeder's QFT?

On page 166, Peskin & Schroeder discuss several propositions related to quantum field theory, including the equivalence of different formulations of QFT, the properties of Lorentz transformations in QFT, and the importance of gauge invariance.

2. How do these propositions relate to the overall understanding of QFT?

These propositions help to further our understanding of QFT by clarifying key concepts and relationships between different aspects of the theory. They also provide a foundation for more advanced topics in QFT.

3. What is the significance of the equivalence of different QFT formulations?

The equivalence of different formulations, such as the Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formulations, shows that these seemingly different approaches to QFT are actually describing the same physical system. This allows for more flexibility in choosing the most convenient formulation for a given problem.

4. How do Lorentz transformations play a role in QFT?

Lorentz transformations are essential in QFT as they describe how quantities, such as fields and particles, behave under changes in reference frames. This is crucial for maintaining the principles of relativity in quantum mechanics.

5. Why is gauge invariance important in QFT?

Gauge invariance is a fundamental aspect of QFT that ensures the consistency and validity of the theory. It also plays a key role in the formulation of the Standard Model, which is the current best description of particle physics.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
12
Views
9K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Quantum Physics
3
Replies
87
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top