Applied mathematics vs. pure mathematics in high school?

In summary, the conversation discusses the difference between applied mathematics and "pure" mathematics in high school. The discussion touches on the emphasis on proving and manipulating expressions in "pure" mathematics versus the application of mathematical theory to the physical world in applied mathematics. The most advantageous way of learning mathematics depends on one's goals, and there is some overlap between the two approaches. It is also mentioned that the popularity of the "Serge Lang-approach" may vary among different countries.
  • #1
Dowland
51
0
Applied mathematics vs. "pure" mathematics in high school?

I've just started working through "Basic Mathematics" by Serge Lang. It immediately struck me, when I skimmed through the pages, that there is a large emphasize on proving things and manipulating expressions, and very little exercises that is applying the mathematical theory to the physical world.

In my country, it's quite the opposite. In high school, about 80% of the exercises are basically applied math. For example, when we learn functions, most of the exercises are of the type:

"The resistance of a metal wire with a definite length is inversely proportional to the square of the wire's diameter. If one reduces the diameter by 25%, with how many percent will the resistance increase" (My own loose, unauthorized translation)

In Basic Mathematics, most of the exercises are of the type:

"Show that any function defined for all numbers can be written as a sum of an even function and an odd function."

The subject of this thread is: What do you think is the most advantegous way of learning mathematics? Would you even make a distinction between these two approaches like I've done, and if so, how would you describe the distinction? Is the latter approach (the "Serge Lang-approach") more popular in America?

(I'm sorry for any eventual language errors, my english proficiency isn't exactly perfect...)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


Dowland said:
...
The subject of this thread is: What do you think is the most advantegous way of learning mathematics?
This depends on what you're planning to do. If you want a degree in mathematics, you'll need to be comfortable with both approaches. If your plans are for something else, then you won't be as concerned with proving things.
Would you even make a distinction between these two approaches like I've done, and if so, how would you describe the distinction?
While the training for each distinction will have some overlap, the goals are often different. Pure/theoretical mathematicians are not usually concerned with the physical implications of whatever they're working on.
Is the latter approach (the "Serge Lang-approach") more popular in America?
I don't know what you mean by "more popular," so I can't really answer the question. More popular with whom: school systems, teachers, students, research?
 
  • #3


In NZ - at secondary level - "applied math" means probability and statistics, while "pure math" means functions and calculus. The rest of math is shared between the courses.

The most advantageous way of learning mathematics is any that you find easy which also gets you the grades... i.e. the topic is too broad.
 
  • #4


Dowland said:
Is the latter approach (the "Serge Lang-approach") more popular in America?

I would be surprised to find Lang's book used for any High-School in the world. I would love to be surprised, though.
 
  • #5


It's definitely about which way you think you want to study. Pure math and applied math aren't clearly separate disciplines, but a different approach and emphasis.

I personally think that pure mathematics is the "purest" way to study mathematics. Applied math is what it says it is, applying math, but the subject of mathematics is really pure mathematics.
 
  • #6


Dembadon said:
I don't know what you mean by "more popular," so I can't really answer the question. More popular with whom: school systems, teachers, students, research?
I meant in high school (in general). It would be interesting to know what the high school curriculums in other countries generally put their emphasize on.
 
  • #7


I suspect Dowland means "more commonly used"... note: a lot of people get the flu-jab but it isn't "popular".
 
  • #8


Thanks, Simon Bridge! "More commonly used" is exactly what I mean.
 

1. What is the difference between applied mathematics and pure mathematics in high school?

Applied mathematics focuses on the practical application of mathematical concepts in real-world situations, while pure mathematics focuses on the theoretical development and exploration of mathematical concepts.

2. How do the two subjects differ in terms of curriculum and content?

In high school, applied mathematics may cover topics such as statistics, probability, and basic calculus, while pure mathematics may cover more advanced topics like abstract algebra, geometry, and number theory.

3. Which subject is more useful for future careers?

Both applied and pure mathematics can be useful for different careers. Applied mathematics is often useful for careers in fields such as engineering, finance, and data analysis, while pure mathematics is more relevant for careers in academia and research.

4. Do students need a strong foundation in pure mathematics to excel in applied mathematics?

While a strong foundation in pure mathematics can be helpful, it is not necessary to excel in applied mathematics. Understanding the basics of algebra and geometry is usually sufficient for success in applied mathematics courses.

5. Are there any prerequisites for taking courses in either subject in high school?

Prerequisites for courses in applied and pure mathematics may vary depending on the school or district. Generally, a strong understanding of basic math concepts and problem-solving skills is required for success in both subjects.

Similar threads

  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
13
Views
993
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
8
Views
822
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • STEM Educators and Teaching
4
Replies
136
Views
5K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top