Frustration with REU Selection Process

In summary, the author is pretty annoyed with a particular REU program, but does not want to name names. They think that the program favours students from schools without graduate programs in physics, and only selects students from ivy league schools. The author is okay with not getting the REU, but is not okay with being rejected because they do not have a college degree that costs half a million dollars. The author thinks that it is paradoxical that the purpose of an REU is to give students experience, but that the program favours students from schools with graduate programs in physics. The author thinks that the difference is that for an REU, you get paid, while for a research credit, you have to pay.
  • #1
Altruist
25
0
so I'm pretty annoyed with a particular REU program, but I won't name names. I just want to understand why some REU's like and say that they would prefer students from schools without graduate programs in physics and then only select students from ivy league schools, or Berkeley, etc...it's pretty enraging to me, especially since the particular REU of which I speak didn't ask for a gpa, personal statement, resume, transcript, or any academic information. They simply asked the standed name, age, etc. followed by a 150 character text box to explain why you want to do their REU. They also wanted to know about programming skills and previous research experience, but mentioned that it was not necessary. I'm okay with not getting the REU based on a lack of research experience (I guess, because that's all they had to judge by), but I am not okay with being rejected because I don't pay half a mil for my college education.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I realize it can be frustrating applying for these things. In fact, I'm not even sure what an REU is exactly - presumably some sort of formalized undergraduate research experience program.

The first question I have is whether you have proof that such programs favour particular schools. Or is this merely something that seems apparent because you and your colleagues did not appear particularly successful in this particular competition?

I might also point out that it seems a 150 character text box and no CV seems like a very poor means of evaluating candidates - hence this competition was likely more of a lottery. As far as gaining a summer research position, I think networking is still your best option. Talk to your professors and TAs to find out which professors at your school are looking for help. Phone them. Email them. Visit them during their office hours. (Obviously not all at once.) You are much more likely to get a job when you have a face and genuine interest rather than 150 characters in a text box.
 
  • #3
well, it turns out that I go to a very small school and know all of the professors in my department. The purpose of an REU (research experience for undergraduates) is to get experience in different fields, to help students decide what sub field they want to go into in grad school. It's very paradoxical in nature. The point is to give students experience on the one hand, but on the other hand they want students with experience. I guess the "proof" I speak of would be the list of students selected this year that they posted on their website, and as well as past years. There are like 8 spots, and 7 are ivy leaguers and one lucky kid gets thrown a bone from some school no one has ever heard of. There are a lot of politics involved and strings to be pulled. I'm researching at my school this summer. The difference is that for an REU you get paid, for a research credit here, you have to pay for it like its a class.
 
  • #4
In my experience the Professors that participate in the REU program pick students from a pool to applications. The Prof. can use any standard for picking students. I've seen students picked because they played soccer, they came from a certain University, or just because they are from a minority group.
 
  • #5
it's such a crock, would it kill them to have an actual conversation with applicants before selection? I mean if we're going to make it one big popularity contest, at least let me use my personality to win a spot...I suppose the reality I come to is that life is not fair, reverse discrimination sucks for whitey...screw equal opprotunity...survival of the fittest bitches...i mean if you aren't a minority and you want to get into the best programs, you better be able to pull some strings, so why not make that a universal truth and screw everyone equally. i am more comfortable getting screwed for being poor than getting screwed for not being a minority, at least i can change my financial status...getting into a college, getting into a program, getting into grad school, and finally getting a job all really depend on who you know, not what you know
 
  • #6
How do you know that it wasn't mostly people from good schools who applied? If that were the case, then it would only be logical that that's where most of the accepted students came from.
 
  • #7
Altruist said:
i mean if you aren't a minority and you want to get into the best programs, you better be able to pull some strings, so why not make that a universal truth and screw everyone equally. i am more comfortable getting screwed for being poor than getting screwed for not being a minority, at least i can change my financial status...getting into a college, getting into a program, getting into grad school, and finally getting a job all really depend on who you know, not what you know

What are you whining about? I know tons of people with way more disadvantaged background (third-world countries) who make it to top programs. Sure they have to work somewhat harder and be somewhat more talented to achieve it. But that is how you compensate for not paying half a million, not being a minority, not having the connection, etc. Maybe you are just not good enough.
 
  • #8
Altruist said:
it's such a crock, would it kill them to have an actual conversation with applicants before selection?

Three hundred applicants, 15-30 minutes each, sometimes needing multiple attempts to reach them. You work it out. Heck, for graduate school - a commitment that is maybe 20 times longer - several places accepted me without talking to me.

Professors have other duties than to select REU students. Indeed, those professors involved in REU are doing undergrads a favor.

Altruist said:
I mean if we're going to make it one big popularity contest, at least let me use my personality to win a spot...

Be careful what you wish for. You're coming across as someone with a huge sense of entitlement and an even bigger chip on his shoulder. These are not the most sought after traits in the lab. If you do end up being contacted, I suggest you tone it down.
 
  • #9
I got into an REU last year as a freshman from a large state school. I'm a white male so I didn't get a minority pass. Quit bitching.
 
  • #10
Altruist said:
it's such a crock, would it kill them to have an actual conversation with applicants before selection?
Despite this formal REU system, I'm sure many professors still hire based on interested students who walk into their offices, introduce themselves and ask if they know of any summer or part-time research assistant opportunities.

In my third year, I earned a summer position working for a pair of theorists by doing just that. Neither of them actually had funding, but one professor helped me write an application/proposal for funding from the faculty of science, which I was subsequently awarded.

It's been my experience that the system favours the proactive.
 
  • #11
The evolution of blame is hilarious.

Altruist said:
would prefer students from schools without graduate programs in physics and then only select students from ivy league schools, or Berkeley, etc...

Altruist said:
but I am not okay with being rejected because I don't pay half a mil for my college education.

Altruist said:
am more comfortable getting screwed for being poor than getting screwed for not being a minority,
 
  • #12
You don't always get what you deserve. And you definitely don't always get what you don't deserve. Either way, quit whining about it... nobody likes a sore loser.

Who cares? You can find a professor somewhere who will take you on for some work. It won't be a paid REU, but you can probably find somebody who will do it without your signing up for a course and paying.

Nobody said life was fair. If life were fair, things would be a lot different. You've got to make the best of what you've got.
 
  • #13
Really dude?
Stop bitching about minorities. Asians get hit harder than you "whiteys" as you called it. Affirmative Action is an artificial pressure meant to reduce "market" race percentages into the general population race division percentages. Asians are like 5% of the total people in the US yet comprise of around 25-30% of most elite schools (the ones you are accusing), thus we actually get a significant disadvantage as Affirmative Action tries to knock down our numbers far more proportionally than it tries to knock down yours.
 
  • #14
My research adviser used to be on the REU selection board for Harvard SAO's REU program. He said there's lots of elements of randomness that play in: things like how well suited a particular student would be to work for such and such a mentor, if that mentor was looking for someone with specific skills to do something like...say...computational physics, or if they wanted anyone and everyone.

I applied to 13 REUs and got rejected to all but 1, which wasn't even an NSF REU at all (REU equivalent for University College London). I don't feel cheated, but rather lucky and extremely grateful. I have to live in the shadow of my class valedictorian who does research with my adviser all the time too, so I know how it goes as far as feeling unappreciated goes, but remember that REUs are extremely competitive.

Going to an Ivy League school does not automatically qualify you to get into an REU program. Me and my valedictorian friend are the only 2 in our class to get accepted for summer research internships. He got accepted to Kitt Peak, Harvard and one other (he picked Harvard, of course), but we both go to a little-known state university, are white, etc. What sets us apart from other students in our dept. is that our adviser has given us challenging, unique research projects to work on and we've done lots of extracurricular stuff as well.

Sometimes REUs don't take those into account, but then again, that falls into the factors of randomness category. If you are a victim of aiming too high, perhaps, a better strategy would've been to go for REU positions where they have a large number of positions to fill (DOE, SARA programs), aren't page 1 research schools, or even hunt for summer research internships over seas. Canada is very close by and has some fantastic institutions to do research at!

If you're going to apply for an REU position in abstract algebra, you're going to be required to know abstract algebra to do it. Plain and simple. REUs teach you how to do research, yeah, but they don't teach you the material you're already supposed to know. If you didn't know it, why did you apply for [x] position in the first place?

Stats I've run from numbers I've gotten mailed to me point to the fact that upwards of 200 people fight for some 8 or 10 positions at major institutions. Suggesting to interview all 200 of those people is going to be time consuming at the very least.

I don't see why you're so distraught. When I got an opportunity to do research with my adviser this last summer, I was ecstatic, despite taking classes at the same time. In fact, through the summer and fall quarters, I wasn't even paid. I didn't do it for the money, I did it for my love of astronomy. If you've landed a research gig with someone at your dept. why worry? If it's because of the money, get used to it: scientists don't make as much as entertainers.
 
  • #15
Ivilean said:
What are you whining about? I know tons of people with way more disadvantaged background (third-world countries) who make it to top programs. Sure they have to work somewhat harder and be somewhat more talented to achieve it. But that is how you compensate for not paying half a million, not being a minority, not having the connection, etc. Maybe you are just not good enough.

you have to be an american citizen to participate in nsf funded programs (i.e. the reu programs)
 
  • #16
Vanadium 50 said:
Three hundred applicants, 15-30 minutes each, sometimes needing multiple attempts to reach them. You work it out. Heck, for graduate school - a commitment that is maybe 20 times longer - several places accepted me without talking to me.

Professors have other duties than to select REU students. Indeed, those professors involved in REU are doing undergrads a favor.



Be careful what you wish for. You're coming across as someone with a huge sense of entitlement and an even bigger chip on his shoulder. These are not the most sought after traits in the lab. If you do end up being contacted, I suggest you tone it down.

voicing my opinions here does not exactly translate to what I would say to a program director, jeeze
 

1. What are some common reasons for frustration with the REU selection process?

Some common reasons for frustration with the REU selection process include: not receiving a response or update on application status, feeling like the selection criteria are unclear or unfair, and not being selected for a program despite meeting all qualifications.

2. How can I improve my chances of being selected for an REU program?

To improve your chances of being selected for an REU program, make sure to thoroughly read and understand the selection criteria, tailor your application materials to the program, and highlight relevant skills and experiences. Additionally, reaching out to program coordinators or past participants for advice can also be helpful.

3. Is there anything I can do to address my frustration with the REU selection process?

If you are feeling frustrated with the REU selection process, it may be helpful to reach out to program coordinators or mentors for feedback on your application and to gain a better understanding of the selection process. Additionally, you can also seek support and advice from peers or mentors who have been through the process.

4. How can I cope with the disappointment of not being selected for an REU program?

It can be difficult to cope with disappointment from not being selected for an REU program, but it's important to remember that the selection process is competitive and not being selected does not reflect on your abilities or potential. It can be helpful to seek support from friends, family, or mentors, and to focus on other opportunities or experiences that can help you reach your goals.

5. Are there any alternatives to the REU program for gaining research experience?

Yes, there are many alternatives to the REU program for gaining research experience, such as seeking out research opportunities at your own institution, participating in online research projects, or reaching out to professors for independent research opportunities. It's important to explore different options and find the best fit for your interests and goals.

Similar threads

  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
4
Views
772
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
2
Views
991
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
7
Views
959
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
6
Views
832
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
29
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
905
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top