How can I determine the limits of integration for an Archimedian spiral?

In summary: In polar coordinates, this can work for θ, but it cannot work for r, as the area element depends on r.
  • #1
CAF123
Gold Member
2,948
88

Homework Statement


See the attached link

The Attempt at a Solution



I considered each shaded part separately. For the one between ##2\pi ## and ##4\pi##, I set up: $$\int_{2\pi}^{4\pi} ((4\pi +\frac{\pi}{2})- (2\pi + \frac{\pi}{2}) d\theta$$ I used a similar method for the other portions and for each portion, I end up with ##4\pi^2##. This does not seem right because some of the shaded sections look larger than the others.

Where is the fault with my method?

Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • Arc.Spiral 002.jpg
    Arc.Spiral 002.jpg
    30.3 KB · Views: 414
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I would expect that your integration variable depends on θ in some way. You just integrate over 2 pi (why?).
 
  • #3
mfb said:
I would expect that your integration variable depends on θ in some way. You just integrate over 2 pi (why?).
In considering the first shaded section (between 2pi and 4pi), I say that the curves ##r = \theta_1 = (4\pi + \pi/2) ## and ##r = \theta_2 = (2\pi + \pi/2)## bound this section.
 
  • #4
I see what I have done wrong. ##\theta## is continually changing so indeed there should be a theta dependence. How do I get the curves that bound each section then?
 
  • #5
I think you you integral gives the area between two concentric circles of radii [itex]2\pi+ \pi/4= 9\pi/4[/itex] and [itex]4\pi+ \pi/2= 9\pi/2[/itex].

The two arms of the spiral, at the start where [itex]\theta= 0[/itex], a ray starts at [itex]2\pi[/itex] and ends at [itex]4\pi[/b], but as [itex]\theta[/itex] increases, so does the distance from the origin to those endpoints. On has [itex]r= 2\pi+ \theta[/itex]

I confess that at first, I thought you were, in fact, using an integral that would give the distance between two concentric circles, but what you are doing is, basically, correct. At the beginning, [itex]\theta= 0[/itex], the x-axis cuts the first loop of the spiral at [itex]2\pi[/itex] and the second at [itex]4\pi[/itex] so its length is [itex]4\pi- 2\pi= 2\pi[/itex]. As [itex]\theta[/itex] increases, a ray crosses the first loop at [itex]2\pi+ \theta[/itex] and the second at [itex]4\pi+ \theta[/itex] but, to my surprise, the difference is still [itex]2\pi[/itex]- there is NO [itex]\theta[/itex] dependence. I don't see where your [itex]2\pi[/itex] terms come from. And I certainly cannot imagine why you are multiplying them!

Since we make one complete loop around the center, the integral does go from [itex]\theta= 0[/itex] to [itex]2\pi[/itex]. Since area, in polar coordinates, is given by [itex]\int rd\theta[/itex], the area you want here is given by
[tex]\int_{\theta= 0}^{2\pi} 2\pi d\theta= 2\pi \int_{\theta= 0}^{2\pi} d\theta[/tex]
 
  • #6
HallsofIvy said:
I don't see where your [itex]2\pi[/itex] terms come from. And I certainly cannot imagine why you are multiplying them!

Where am I multiplying them about?
Since we make one complete loop around the center, the integral does go from [itex]\theta= 0[/itex] to [itex]2\pi[/itex]. Since area, in polar coordinates, is given by [itex]\int rd\theta[/itex], the area you want here is given by
[tex]\int_{\theta= 0}^{2\pi} 2\pi d\theta= 2\pi \int_{\theta= 0}^{2\pi} d\theta[/tex]

Why do we consider theta from 0 to 2pi? this does not correspond to a shaded section?
Thanks.
 
  • #7
The integral itself does not work. In polar coordinates, area is given by r dr dθ. You can perform the integration over r first (this is a good idea), but the result is not just the difference in radius, due to the additional factor of r inside. You will get expressions with the squared radius.
 
  • #8
mfb said:
The integral itself does not work. In polar coordinates, area is given by r dr dθ. You can perform the integration over r first (this is a good idea), but the result is not just the difference in radius, due to the additional factor of r inside. You will get expressions with the squared radius.
So we consider a double integral here? why? Would the limits of r and θ be the same?
 
  • #9
You want to calculate an area - it is two-dimensional. In a cartesian coordinate system, many problems have a trivial integral in one coordinate - you can simplify the two-dimensional integral to one dimension without calculating anything.
In polar coordinates, this can work for θ, but it cannot work for r, as the area element depends on r.
The limits for r and θ are fine.
 
  • #10
The polar area between the origin and ##r = f(\theta)## for ##\theta## between ##\alpha## and ##\beta## is$$
A=\frac 1 2\int_\alpha^\beta f^2(\theta)\, d\theta$$The tricky thing about your problem is some of the area gets repeated as ##\theta## varies. If you let ##\theta## go from ##4\pi## to ##6\pi## you would get all the area that is shaded plus the white center area. Then it looks to me like you could subtract that white area by going from ##2\pi## to ##4\pi##, unless I'm overlooking something.
 
  • #11
LCKurtz said:
Then it looks to me like you could subtract that white area by going from ##2\pi## to ##4\pi##, unless I'm overlooking something.

Would you not subtract from ##0## to ##4\pi##?
 
  • #12
mfb said:
You want to calculate an area - it is two-dimensional. In a cartesian coordinate system, many problems have a trivial integral in one coordinate - you can simplify the two-dimensional integral to one dimension without calculating anything.
Could you explain a bit more what you mean here? I have done integrals that represent areas as single integrals, (I.e at high school level).
 
  • #13
CAF123 said:
Would you not subtract from ##0## to ##4\pi##?

That counts some of the white area more than once, no? If you shade that inside area for ##\theta## sweeping from ##0## to ##2\pi##, that same area is swept out again as ##\theta## goes from ##2\pi## to ##4\pi##.
 
  • #14
LCKurtz said:
That counts some of the white area more than once, no? If you shade that inside area for ##\theta## sweeping from ##0## to ##2\pi##, that same area is swept out again as ##\theta## goes from ##2\pi## to ##4\pi##.
I see. Your method gives the correct answer.
 
  • #15
CAF123 said:

Homework Statement


See the attached link

The Attempt at a Solution



I considered each shaded part separately. For the one between ##2\pi ## and ##4\pi##, I set up: $$\int_{2\pi}^{4\pi} ((4\pi +\frac{\pi}{2})- (2\pi + \frac{\pi}{2}) d\theta$$ I used a similar method for the other portions and for each portion, I end up with ##4\pi^2##. This does not seem right because some of the shaded sections look larger than the others.

Where is the fault with my method?

Thanks!
For one thing, your reference to the shaded part "between ##2\pi ## and ##4\pi##" is at best ambiguous and at worst it makes no sense.

The spiral from θ = 2π to θ = 4π forms the "inner" boundary of the shaded region.

You can do this nicely with an iterated (double) integral in polar coordinates. (I assume we don't want that approach here.)

Consider a washer with inner radius, r, and outer radius, R. The area, ΔA, of this washer between θ and θ + Δθ is [itex]\displaystyle \Delta A=(1/2)R^2\Delta\theta-(1/2)r^2\Delta\theta[/itex]


For the spiral in this problem, let r = θ and R = θ + 2π .

Integrate from θ = 2π to 4π .
 
  • #16
SammyS said:
For one thing, your reference to the shaded part "between ##2\pi ## and ##4\pi##" is at best ambiguous and at worst it makes no sense.

The spiral from θ = 2π to θ = 4π forms the "inner" boundary of the shaded region.

You can do this nicely with an iterated (double) integral in polar coordinates. (I assume we don't want that approach here.)

Consider a washer with inner radius, r, and outer radius, R. The area, ΔA, of this washer between θ and θ + Δθ is [itex]\displaystyle \Delta A=(1/2)R^2\Delta\theta-(1/2)r^2\Delta\theta[/itex]For the spiral in this problem, let r = θ and R = θ + 2π .

Integrate from θ = 2π to 4π .

Thanks for this method. Yes, I agree that what I wrote in the OP is nonsensical since θ is continually changing. I wouldn't mind seeing the double integral approach, I just don't see why it is necessary? Thanks!
 
  • #17
CAF123 said:
Could you explain a bit more what you mean here? I have done integrals that represent areas as single integrals, (I.e at high school level).
As I said, one integral there was trivial.

If you want to calculate the area under the curve f(x) from a to b, you can express this as $$\int_a^b dx \int_0^{f(x)} 1 dy = \int_a^b dx (f(x)-0) dy= \int_a^b f(x) dx$$ which is the usual one-dimensional integral.
"1" comes from the cartesian coordinate system. It allows to perform the inner integral without writing it down, as it is simply the difference between the upper and lower bound.
In polar coordinates, you cannot do this with the integral over r.

$$\int_{2\pi}^{4\pi} d\theta \int_\theta^{\theta+2\pi} r dr = \int_{2\pi}^{4\pi} \frac{1}{2}\left((\theta+2\pi)^2 - \theta^2\right)d\theta = \int_{2\pi}^{4\pi} (2\pi\theta+2\pi^2)d\theta = 4\pi^3 + 2 \pi (16\pi^2 - 2\pi^2) = 32\pi^3$$

Hmm, looks quite big. Maybe I made an error somewhere.
 
  • #18
CAF123 said:
Thanks for this method. Yes, I agree that what I wrote in the OP is nonsensical since θ is continually changing. I wouldn't mind seeing the double integral approach, I just don't see why it is necessary? Thanks!
Of course, it's not necessary.

Do you really want to see it?
 
  • #19
Hi SammyS,
What I meant by 'why is it necessary' was why the need for a double integral? Although mfb has cleared that up. Is the double integral approach what mfb showed? If not, yes, I would like to see it.
Thanks.

@mfb the answer is ##16\pi^3##. But I do see your error. Thanks.
 
  • #20
Oh, the last 16 should be 8, right.

Is the double integral approach what mfb showed?
Right.
 
  • #21
mfb said:
Where did you find the error?
##\pi \theta^2 + 2\pi^2 \theta## evaluated between ##2\pi## and ##4\pi## is $$16\pi^3 + 8\pi^3 - 4\pi^3 - 4\pi^3$$
 
  • #22
CAF123 said:
Hi SammyS,
What I meant by 'why is it necessary' was why the need for a double integral? Although mfb has cleared that up. Is the double integral approach what mfb showed? If not, yes, I would like to see it.
Thanks.
That's what I thought you meant ... and the answer is that this can be done without a double integral, so using a double integral is not necessary.

Since you want to see the double integral solution, here it is:

[itex]\displaystyle \int_{2\pi}^{4\pi}\int_{\theta}^{\theta+2\pi}r\,dr\,d\theta[/itex]
 
  • #23
SammyS said:
That's what I thought you meant ... and the answer is that this can be done without a double integral, so using a double integral is not necessary.
You just do the first integration step ("area, ΔA, of this washer") before writing down the integral over θ.
 
  • #24
Actually, could you explain how you get those limits: I think the θ limits are from 2π to 4π because that is the 'inner' curve that bounds the shaded section. Correct? Why is r from θ to θ + 2π ?
 
  • #25
θ=r is the inner part of your spiral (starting at 2pi and increasing to 4pi), and the outer part is the next winding 2 pi away, so θ=r+2pi (starting at 4pi and increasing to 6pi).

You can change the limits, if you like, for example like this:
$$\int_0^{2\pi} d\theta \int_{2\pi+\theta}^{4\pi+\theta} r dr$$
 
  • #26
CAF123 said:
Actually, could you explain how you get those limits: I think the θ limits are from 2π to 4π because that is the 'inner' curve that bounds the shaded section. Correct? Why is r from θ to θ + 2π ?
The θ limits are indeed from 2π to 4π. That's the outer integral.

As for
"Why is r from θ to θ + 2π ?"​
Look at your figure. r goes from the inner boundary to the outer boundary. The inner boundary is at r = θ . To get to the outer boundary, r = θ + 2π .
 

What is the Area of an Archimedian Spiral?

The area of an Archimedian spiral is the total amount of space that is enclosed within the spiral. It is measured in square units, such as square inches or square meters.

How is the Area of an Archimedian Spiral calculated?

The area of an Archimedian spiral can be calculated using the formula A = (1/2)r^2θ, where A is the area, r is the radius of the spiral, and θ is the angle between the radius and the tangent line at that point.

What is the significance of the Area of an Archimedian Spiral?

The area of an Archimedian spiral is important because it can be used to determine the amount of material needed to create a spiral, such as in architecture or engineering. It also has applications in physics and mathematics.

What factors can affect the Area of an Archimedian Spiral?

The area of an Archimedian spiral can be affected by the radius of the spiral, the angle between the radius and the tangent line, and the number of revolutions of the spiral. Changing these factors can result in a larger or smaller area.

How is the Area of an Archimedian Spiral used in real-life applications?

The area of an Archimedian spiral has practical applications in various fields, such as architecture, engineering, and design. It can be used to determine the amount of material needed to create a spiral structure, such as a staircase or a spiral-shaped building. It can also be applied in physics and mathematics to study the behavior of spirals in nature and in different systems.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
488
Replies
14
Views
942
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
742
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
117
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
165
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
920
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
853
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
831
Back
Top