simple question on stoke's first problem


by joshmccraney
Tags: simple, stoke
joshmccraney
joshmccraney is offline
#1
Oct25-13, 12:51 AM
P: 227
hey pf! please read this, it's honestly pretty easy although long to read.

in stoke's first problem, we have parallel flow initially at rest and then, instantaneously (i know, unrealistic) one wall starts to move in the x-direction with no acceleration (yes, it magically becomes a velocity). the y-direction is perpendicular to the x direction and is directing toward the other wall. the z-direction is coming "out of the page".

okay, now time for the question.

conservation of mass for incompressible flows yields: $$ \nabla \cdot \vec{U}=0 \Rightarrow \frac{dv}{dy}=0$$ since [itex] \frac{du}{dx}=\frac{dw}{dz}[/itex] are identically zero. my question is, why isn't [itex]\frac{dv}{dy}[/itex] identically zero? i know it equals zero from the above, but how does it exist at all? how is there velocity in the [itex]y[/itex] direction?

it makes sense to me that the other two are zero by inspection, but why not [itex]y[/itex]? to me it seems [itex]\frac{du}{dy}[/itex] would not be zero but that all others would be. please help me understand how there exists y-direction velocity ([itex]y[/itex] )

thanks ahead of time!!
Phys.Org News Partner Engineering news on Phys.org
Lifting the brakes on fuel efficiency
PsiKick's batteryless sensors poised for coming 'Internet of things'
Researcher launches successful tech start-up to help the blind
njoysci
njoysci is offline
#2
Nov8-13, 05:44 PM
P: 13
Your intuition and majority of statements are accurate, just a little variable terminology confusion:
U = u i + v j + w k
For your example: 0<= u <= V where V = wall velocity; v = 0; w = 0
Therefore ∂v/∂x = ∂v/∂y = ∂v/∂z = 0 and ∂w/∂x = ∂w/∂y = ∂w/∂z = 0
∇ dot U = ∂u/∂x + ∂v/∂y + ∂w/∂z = 0 (conservation of mass for incompressible flow)
Since flow is constant in the x direction for a given y, then ∂u/∂x = 0
So indeed ∇ dot U = 0 based upon the above partials.
In summary, since v is the fluid velocity in the y direction, it is zero. Hence ∂v/∂y = 0.
The only fluid flow is in the x direction, and since u varies as a function of y and is not constant, then ∂u/∂y is not zero. The molecules of each horizontal layer collide and change the molecular velocity in the adjacent horizontal layer. For instance for a typical Newtonian fluid
∂u/∂y = - fluid shear stress / viscosity


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Navier Stoke Problem Differential Equations 4
Probably simple proof (Stoke's Theorem) Advanced Physics Homework 0
Problem with a simple Stoke's Theorem question... Calculus & Beyond Homework 2
Stoke's Theorem simple case Calculus 1
Stoke's Theorem Problem? Calculus 0