Static and Kinetic Friction

In summary, the conversation discussed the difference between the slopes of the lines of best fit and the tangents of the angles of incline. The static friction slope was found to be 4N/kg while the kinetic slope was 2.2N/kg. After dividing these numbers by the gravitational field intensity of 9.8 m/s, the tangents were calculated to be 0.488 for static and 0.344 for kinetic, resulting in a percent difference of 18% for static and 42% for kinetic. The reason for the difference was attributed to the bonded ground and the ease of movement for the block.
  • #1
jellybeansies
2
0
1. Comment on the difference (if any) between the slopes of the lines of best fit and the tangents of the angles of incline.
In my data i got that the static friction slope was 4N/kg and the kinetic was 2.2N/kg. and i think that we're supposed to divide that number by the gravitaional field intesity of 9.8 m/s [down] (0.408-static) and (0.488-kinetic) then compare it to the tan which i got 0.488-static and 0.344 for kinetic and when i calculated percent difference i got 18%(static) and 42%(kinetic).
So, what comments should i say?




Homework Equations





3. I think that the static is bigger because it takes more force because of the bonded ground to the block that we made slide down a plank of wood. and then when its moving its easier so the kinetic is easier. =(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
sorrrry it was my first time.
i kind of messed up the stuff.

1. Comment on the difference (if any) between the slopes of the lines of best fit and the tangents of the angles of incline.
In my data i got that the static friction slope was 4N/kg and the kinetic was 2.2N/kg. and i think that we're supposed to divide that number by the gravitaional field intesity of 9.8 m/s [down] (0.408-static) and (0.488-kinetic) then compare it to the tan which i got 0.488-static and 0.344 for kinetic and when i calculated percent difference i got 18%(static) and 42%(kinetic).
So, what comments should i say?

3. I think that the static is bigger because it takes more force because of the bonded ground to the block that we made slide down a plank of wood. and then when its moving its easier so the kinetic is smaller. =(
 
  • #3


I would like to commend you for your accurate data collection and analysis. The difference between the slopes of the lines of best fit and the tangents of the angles of incline represents the difference between static and kinetic friction. The slopes of the lines of best fit show the overall relationship between force and mass for both static and kinetic friction, while the tangents of the angles of incline represent the instantaneous relationship at a specific angle of incline.

From your data, it is clear that the slope for static friction is higher than that of kinetic friction. This is because static friction is the force required to overcome the initial resistance of an object at rest, which is typically higher than the force required to keep an object in motion (kinetic friction). This is due to the interlocking of microscopic surfaces between the object and the surface it is resting on.

The percent differences you calculated also support this observation, with a larger difference for kinetic friction compared to static friction. This is because the tangents of the angles of incline are affected by the instantaneous values, while the slopes of the lines of best fit take into account the overall relationship between force and mass.

Your statement about the bonded ground and the ease of movement for kinetic friction is also correct. When an object is in motion, the microscopic surfaces are already in motion and require less force to maintain that motion. Overall, your analysis is accurate and demonstrates a good understanding of the concept of static and kinetic friction. Great job!
 

1. What is the difference between static and kinetic friction?

Static friction is the force that prevents an object from moving when a force is applied to it, while kinetic friction is the force that acts on an object in motion. In other words, static friction keeps an object in place, while kinetic friction slows down an object's movement.

2. How is static friction calculated?

Static friction is calculated by multiplying the coefficient of static friction (a constant value that depends on the materials in contact) by the normal force (the force perpendicular to the surface that the object is on).

3. What factors affect the coefficient of static friction?

The coefficient of static friction depends on the materials in contact and their surface roughness. It also varies with temperature and can be affected by the presence of lubricants or contaminants on the surfaces.

4. Can the coefficient of kinetic friction be greater than the coefficient of static friction?

Yes, it is possible for the coefficient of kinetic friction to be greater than the coefficient of static friction. This can happen when the surfaces are smoother in motion than at rest, or when there is a lubricant present.

5. How does kinetic friction affect an object's velocity?

Kinetic friction acts in the opposite direction of an object's motion and decreases its velocity. As the object moves, it experiences a constant force of kinetic friction until it comes to a stop or reaches a constant speed.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
556
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
623
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
570
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
2K
Back
Top