- #316
- 12,175
- 182
It is my pleasure to remind to youGreg Bernhardt said:ah yes thanks for reminding me
It is my pleasure to remind to youGreg Bernhardt said:ah yes thanks for reminding me
quasar987 said:In this thread, https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=510385, does anyone know what might have triggered the appearance of the red part? I double checked and I didn't forget to write "\par" or anything. I even made a copy paste of the "{\partial f}" that appears in the LHS of the equation and the red part still appears in the LHS. The code I used is
\sum_i\frac{\partial f}{\partial x^i}\frac{d\varphi^i_x(t)}{dt}(0)=\sum_i\frac{\partial f}{\partial x^i}X^i(x)
I'm bumping this question. Greg, did you decide that you don't want any new delimiters for LaTeX?vela said:Any decision on new delimiters?
Ben Niehoff said:THere's a simple explanation why: The best a regular expression algorithm can do is search for two $ signs with something in between. That is, a regular expression such as (Perl syntax)
\$(.*)\$
I like Serena said:What about:
\$([^\$]*)\$
or
\$(.*?)\$
I've learned to always use pretty strict expressions in Perl to avoid such problems.
It's significantly harder to to type than ££.Ben Niehoff said:Why not choose \$ as the LaTeX delimiter? Then there is no collision with ordinary dollar signs.
As I said, all that's required is a simple edit of a MathJax configuration file. (OK, maybe not if you specifically want to use \$ as a delimiter).Ben Niehoff said:It seems to be a Javascript that runs on the completed page, which is long after the vBulletin parser processes the posts. In that case, I think we're stuck with 'itex' and 'tex'.
Why not? What's wrong with using something like ##?Ben Niehoff said:I would recommend against making the delimiter some random symbol. The $ sign is standardized already, but if it can't be the $ sign, it shouldn't be some other symbol.
I had another look a the keyboard layout page. I had forgotten that ££ is a bad option for people with a US keyboard. ## is better for them. But most of the rest of the world should prefer ££ (based on the location on the keyboard), so here's a third option:Fredrik said:The simple option is:
££...££ for itex
$$...$$ for tex
Almost everyone has # and/or £ on the 3 key, and $ on the 4 key. Most (all?) of the ones who don't can still type those symbols easily.
The complicated option is:
££...££, ##...##, §§...§§, ··...·· for itex.
$$...$$, ¢¢...¢¢ for tex.
The §,· and ¢ characters are minor improvements for Germans, Spaniards, and French Canadians respectively. The only advantage it has for them is that it allows them to use either Shift+3 for itex and Shift+4 for tex, or Alt Gr+3 for itex and Alt Gr+4 for tex, instead of e.g. Alt Gr+3 for itex and Shift+4 for tex.
Keyboard layouts at Wikipedia.
I'd modify that slightly to ##…## and ££…££ for itex.Fredrik said:##...## or ££...££ for itex
$$...$$ for tex
Your closing itex tags are wrong. Use /, not \.Juqon said:Why is my latex code not processed?
As a start, you need to put some spaces in with that code. After 50 consecutive characters without a space, the processor will automatically insert a space.Juqon said:
Juqon said:
What the other two guys said. As an alternative to multiple tex tags, use the align environment. That will make the \\ code work. Like this: \begin{align}Juqon said:
You can't open with "tex" and close with "itex" or vice versa. You need to specify a unit for the hspace command. Note sure about the tables.paul-g said:I am writing because I do not know how to write the following formula in MathJax
A latex processor is a machine used in the production of latex products, such as gloves, balloons, and condoms. It is responsible for converting raw latex material into a usable form for manufacturing.
The testing process for a new latex processor involves running the machine through a series of trials to ensure its functionality and efficiency. This includes testing its ability to convert raw latex material, its speed and accuracy, and its overall performance.
Testing a new latex processor allows for any potential issues or defects to be identified and addressed before the machine is put into production. This ensures that the final product is of high quality and meets industry standards.
The testing process for a new latex processor can vary depending on the complexity of the machine and the thoroughness of the testing. It can range from a few days to several weeks, with multiple rounds of testing and adjustments.
The testing of a new latex processor is typically conducted by a team of scientists, engineers, and technicians who specialize in the development and production of latex products. They work closely with the manufacturer to ensure the machine meets all necessary requirements.