Is the Dual Nature of Light Really That Confusing?

In summary, Leonard Susskind discusses how he is confused by the wave-particle dichotomy and how a rock can be a wave. He also discusses how light is a traveling pair of orthogonal waves and how the electromagnetic field is not just a convenience.
  • #1
bobsmith76
336
0
In the documentary the Fabric of the Cosmos Leonard Susskind remarks how confused he is that a photon could be both a wave and a particle, he says a rock is a rock, and a wave is a wave (a picture of an ocean wave crashing). How could a rock be a wave?

To me the answer is obvious, a wave is just an abstract description of how matter moves. Any material body can be both a body and a wave so long as it moves in a wave form. I don't understand why this is hard to understand.

I put this in the classical category because it concerns optics.
 
Science news on Phys.org
  • #2
Susskind is making the point that there is no true wave-particle dichotomy. His confusion is rhetorical.
 
  • #3
bobsmith76 said:
In the documentary the Fabric of the Cosmos Leonard Susskind remarks how confused he is that a photon could be both a wave and a particle, he says a rock is a rock, and a wave is a wave (a picture of an ocean wave crashing). How could a rock be a wave?

To me the answer is obvious, a wave is just an abstract description of how matter moves. Any material body can be both a body and a wave so long as it moves in a wave form. I don't understand why this is hard to understand.

I put this in the classical category because it concerns optics.

In Maxwell's equations, light is a traveling pair of orthogonal waves, one an electric field, the other a magnetic field. This description does not use the idea of motion of matter. Rather it uses the idea of oscillating fields.

Many fields - e.g. the static gravitational field or static electric field - can be thought of as mere mathematical conveniences for describing a distribution of forces in space. They are a way to avoid discussing action at a distance. But the electromagnetic field describes light itself and in some sense is not just a convenience. So this is a case where the wave is niether a description of motion of matter not is it a pure mathematical convenience.
 
  • #4
bobsmith76 said:
To me the answer is obvious, a wave is just an abstract description of how matter moves. Any material body can be both a body and a wave so long as it moves in a wave form. I don't understand why this is hard to understand.

A wave in water is easy to understand because there are untold trillions and trillions of atoms that contribute to the effect. However with single particles this is not the case. There is no way to understand it other than to accept that the math used to describe, understand, and predict where something will be is a wavefunction.

Personally I choose to view it like this. All "particle" and "wave" like properties that are observable to us in our everyday lives, are simply a likeness of the actual quantum effect which is the "real" way the universe works. So a water wave uses similar math and acts similar to the "quantum" effect, but only so far. A water wave will not tunnel to the other side of a barrier like a subatomic particle can. But I'm sure I've broken a dozen scientific rules or something with this.
 
  • #5


I can understand why the dual nature of light can be confusing to some. It goes against our everyday experience and intuition to think of something as both a wave and a particle. However, this is the reality of quantum mechanics and it has been confirmed through countless experiments.

The idea of wave-particle duality is not limited to light, but applies to all particles at the quantum level. It is a fundamental concept in physics and has been extensively studied and tested. It is not something that can be easily explained or visualized in our macroscopic world, but it is a cornerstone of our understanding of the universe.

To answer the question of how a rock can be a wave, it is important to understand that at the quantum level, particles do not behave in the same way as macroscopic objects. They can exhibit wave-like behavior, such as interference patterns, and also behave as discrete particles with specific energies. This duality is not contradictory, but rather a reflection of the complex nature of the quantum world.

It is true that a wave is an abstract description of how matter moves, but it is a crucial concept in understanding the behavior of particles at the quantum level. The concept of wave-particle duality may be difficult to grasp, but it is a well-established and fundamental principle in physics. As scientists, we must continue to explore and study this concept in order to deepen our understanding of the universe.
 

1. What is the dual nature of light?

The dual nature of light refers to the fact that light exhibits both wave-like and particle-like behavior. This means that light can behave as both a wave and a particle depending on the situation.

2. How was the dual nature of light discovered?

The dual nature of light was first discovered by the scientist Thomas Young in the early 1800s. He conducted an experiment called the double-slit experiment which showed that light behaves like a wave, but later experiments showed that it also behaves like a particle.

3. What is the significance of the dual nature of light?

The dual nature of light has significant implications in the field of quantum mechanics and has led to the development of the wave-particle duality theory. It also explains various phenomena such as interference and diffraction that cannot be explained by classical wave or particle theories alone.

4. How does the dual nature of light affect our everyday lives?

The dual nature of light has many applications in our everyday lives, such as in technology and medical imaging. For example, the wave-like nature of light allows for the use of lasers in various technologies, while the particle-like nature of light is utilized in medical imaging techniques like X-rays.

5. Can the dual nature of light be observed directly?

No, the dual nature of light cannot be observed directly as it is a fundamental property of light that cannot be seen with the naked eye. However, its effects can be observed through various experiments and technologies that utilize the wave-particle duality of light.

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
28
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
45
Views
3K
Back
Top