Is the Generation of Photons Related to Electromagnetic Loops?

In summary, the confusion is caused by trying to understand the generation of photons in terms of classical electromagnetic theory. However, the quantum description of photons and their relation to the electromagnetic field is more subtle and complex. The classical EM field is essentially a quantum description of a photon, and there is no difference between the magnetic and electric components of a photon. The generation of photons involves accelerating charges and perturbative approaches in quantum mechanics.
  • #1
-Job-
Science Advisor
1,158
4
Please help clear some confusion of mine.
Assuming that light is just an electromagnetic loop (correct me if I'm wrong :tongue2: ), where a changing electric field induces a magnetic field and vice-versa, by what process then is a photon generated?
I was thinking that since photons are emitted whenever an electron jumps to a lower energy orbit, that this jump probably initiates this loop which seems reasonable, seeing as the jump might create a small magnetic field (?), but how does it come to enter a loop?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
-Job- said:
Please help clear some confusion of mine.
Assuming that light is just an electromagnetic loop (correct me if I'm wrong :tongue2: ), where a changing electric field induces a magnetic field and vice-versa, by what process then is a photon generated?

In order to make you see the difficulty in trying to answer the question, let us rephrase it in another context, namely that of the non-relativistic quantum description of the hydrogen atom. Your question is then: Assuming that the hydrogen atom is described by a wavefunction (the equivalent here, of your E and B field), by what process then is an electron generated ?

In other words, the classical EM field is, in a certain respect, nothing else but the quantum description of a photon. (in reality, the issue is a bit more subtle).
 
  • #3
vanesch said:
In other words, the classical EM field is, in a certain respect, nothing else but the quantum description of a photon. (in reality, the issue is a bit more subtle).


Does this mean that photons have a magnetic charge? or, does it mean that photons are more or less the magnetic charge themselves?

Of course, the answer's probably neither. :eek:
 
  • #4
From what I've learned photons are alternating magnetic and electric fields. I find this to be a pretty cool model. I just can't understand how this is carried out. A changing magnetic field creates an electric field, and a changing electric field creates a magnetic field, but if i move a magnet around it doesn't generate any photons, (i know it sounds ridiculous :smile: ) but the magnetic-to-electric portion of this loop must be carried out somehow, how does the magnetic component of a photon produce its electric component? And why doesn't it end there, why does this enter a loop? Are there any diagrams i can look at? I'm confused.
 
  • #5
-Job- said:
Please help clear some confusion of mine.
Assuming that light is just an electromagnetic loop (correct me if I'm wrong :tongue2: ), where a changing electric field induces a magnetic field and vice-versa, by what process then is a photon generated?
I was thinking that since photons are emitted whenever an electron jumps to a lower energy orbit, that this jump probably initiates this loop which seems reasonable, seeing as the jump might create a small magnetic field (?), but how does it come to enter a loop?

Are u referring to propagating EM wave? If so, then this requires accelerating charges, which have matured models in classical EM theory.

The QM picture of photon emission are usually done using perturbative approach. See "Physics of atoms and molecules" by Bransden.
 
  • #6
"if i move a magnet around it doesn't generate any photons, (i know it sounds ridiculous ) but the magnetic-to-electric portion of this loop must be carried out somehow, how does the magnetic component of a photon produce its electric component?"

Hmm that's a good question. If I had to guess, I'd say that in truth there is no difference between the magnetic-to-electric loop and the electric-to-magnetic loop: like a nickel with a heads and a tails flying through the air. The same impetus which causes a photon to carry electrical charges probably acts equally on a photon's magnetic properties, as they are two sides of the same coin - sorry bout the pun. I think electricity and magnetism are interchangeable, so there might be no need for two different paths.
 

1. What is electromagnetic confusion?

Electromagnetic confusion is a phenomenon where the presence of multiple electromagnetic signals can interfere with each other, causing distortion or disruption of the signals.

2. What causes electromagnetic confusion?

Electromagnetic confusion can be caused by a variety of factors, such as overlapping frequency ranges of different signals, electromagnetic interference from nearby devices, or reflections of signals off of surfaces.

3. What are the effects of electromagnetic confusion?

The effects of electromagnetic confusion can vary depending on the severity and duration of the interference. In some cases, it may result in poor signal quality, data loss, or even complete signal failure.

4. How can electromagnetic confusion be prevented?

To prevent electromagnetic confusion, proper shielding and grounding of electronic devices can be implemented. Additionally, careful frequency planning and using devices with different frequency ranges can help reduce the likelihood of interference.

5. Is electromagnetic confusion harmful to humans?

While electromagnetic confusion can be disruptive to electronic devices, there is currently no evidence that it is harmful to human health. However, it is still important to monitor and regulate electromagnetic emissions to ensure safe levels.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Physics
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
715
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
6
Views
979
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top