Cdf of a discrete random variable and convergence of distributions

In summary, the conversation discusses the confusion surrounding the limits of F_{X_n}(x) and F_X(x) at continuity points x of F_x. It is noted that while the graph of F_X(x) is a straight line y=0, with only x=0 at y=1, the points to the right of zero should not be equal to the limit of F_{X_n}(x) because F_X(x) is always zero at those points, but F_X(x) is 1. The conversation then delves into the limits at specific points and concludes that the limits under consideration involve n \rightarrow \infty.
  • #1
Artusartos
247
0
In the page that I attached, it says "...while at the continuity points x of [itex]F_x[/itex] (i.e., [itex]x \not= 0[/itex]), [itex]lim F_{X_n}(x) = F_X(x)[/itex]." But we know that the graph of [itex]F_X(x)[/itex] is a straight line y=0, with only x=0 at y=1, right? But then all the points to the right of zero should not be equal to the limit of [itex]F_{X_n}(x)[/itex], right? Because [itex]F_X(x)[/itex] is always zero at those points, but [itex]F_X(x)[/itex] is 1? So how do I make sense of that?

Thanks in advance
 

Attachments

  • 295(1).jpg
    295(1).jpg
    25.4 KB · Views: 381
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Artusartos said:
But we know that the graph of [itex]F_X(x)[/itex] is a straight line y=0, with only x=0 at y=1, right?

No, I think [itex] F_X(x) [/itex] is the cumulative distribution, not a density function.
 
  • #3
Stephen Tashi said:
No, I think [itex] F_X(x) [/itex] is the cumulative distribution, not a density function.

Oh, ok...

But it's still confusing. What if n=4 (for example)? Then [tex]F_{X_n} = 1[/tex] if [tex]x \geq 1/4[/tex], and [tex]F_{X_n}=0[/tex], when [tex]x < 1/4[/tex], right? So for any x between 0 and 1/4, the limit at those points is 0, but the limit of [tex]F_X[/tex] at those points is 1...so the limits are not equal, are they?
 
  • #4
Artusartos said:
So for any x between 0 and 1/4, the limit at those points is 0,

What limit are you talking about? Something like [itex] lim_{x \rightarrow 1/8} F_{X_4}(x) [/itex] ? I see nothing in the discussion in the book that dealt with that sort of limit. The limits under consideration involve [itex] n \rightarrow \infty [/itex].
 
  • #5
for your question and for attaching the page for reference. The statement you referenced is discussing the convergence of distributions, which is a concept in probability theory that deals with the behavior of a sequence of random variables as the number of variables in the sequence increases. This is different from the cumulative distribution function (CDF), which is a function that maps the probability of a random variable being less than or equal to a certain value.

In the statement, the limit refers to the behavior of the CDF of the sequence of random variables (F_{X_n}(x)) as the number of variables (n) increases. The CDF of a discrete random variable is a step function, where the jumps occur at the values of the random variable. So, at the continuity points (x \not= 0), the limit of F_{X_n}(x) as n increases equals the value of F_X(x). This means that as the number of variables in the sequence increases, the CDF of the sequence approaches the CDF of the original random variable at those points.

You are correct in saying that the graph of F_X(x) is a straight line with a value of 1 at x=0 and a value of 0 at all other points. However, this is for the CDF of a specific random variable, not a sequence of random variables. The statement is discussing the behavior of the CDF of a sequence of random variables, which may have different CDFs at different points.

In summary, the statement is discussing the convergence of distributions, which is a concept in probability theory that deals with the behavior of a sequence of random variables. The limit mentioned is referring to the behavior of the CDF of the sequence as the number of variables in the sequence increases, and it does not necessarily equal the CDF of a specific random variable at all points. I hope this helps clarify the concept for you.
 

What is the CDF of a discrete random variable?

The Cumulative Distribution Function (CDF) of a discrete random variable is a function that maps the probability of the variable taking on a certain value or a value less than or equal to that value.

How is the CDF of a discrete random variable calculated?

The CDF of a discrete random variable is calculated by summing the probabilities of all the outcomes less than or equal to the value of interest.

What is the significance of the CDF in probability and statistics?

The CDF is important in probability and statistics as it allows us to determine the probability of a random variable taking on a certain value or a value less than or equal to that value. It also helps us to analyze and compare different distributions and their properties.

What is convergence of distributions?

Convergence of distributions refers to the behavior of a sequence of random variables as the number of observations increases. It is the process of determining whether the observed data is approaching a specific distribution as the sample size increases.

What is the relationship between the CDF of a discrete random variable and convergence of distributions?

The CDF of a discrete random variable is a key component in determining the convergence of distributions. As the sample size increases, the CDF of the observed data should converge to the CDF of the underlying distribution, indicating that the observed data is following the same distribution as the underlying population.

Similar threads

  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
3
Views
735
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
1
Views
919
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
17
Views
846
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
5
Views
896
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
0
Views
347
Back
Top