Chemical Equilibrium: Opposite Answers Explained

In summary: HBR concentration...why does the answer refer to a completely different subject? Have you even posted the corresponding answer? Have you accurately posted the question?First step in getting help with your question-post the actual question.
  • #1
answerseeker
27
0
there are 2 Questions in which they seem like they should have the same answer, but apparently they dont, which is confusing.

1. 2NH3 <--> N2(g) + 3H2(g) initially, NH3 is added to empty flask. how do rates of forward and reverse reactions change as system proceeds towards eqm?
answer: forward rate decreases and reverse rate increases.

2. 2HBr (g) <--> H2(g) + Br2 (g) initially, HBr is added to empty flask. how do rate of forward reaction and [HBr] change as system proceeds to eqm?
answer: forward rate increases and reverse rate increases.


why are the answers almost opposite? is it because of [HBr] in question2? it seems like the 2 questions are the same..
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
  • #2
2. 2HBr (g) <--> H2(g) + Br2 (g) initially, HBr is added to empty flask. how do rate of forward reaction and [HBr] change as system proceeds to eqm?
answer: forward rate increases and reverse rate increases.
again...what on earth? The question asks for the dynamics of forward reaction and HBR concentration...why does the answer refer to a completely different subject? Have you even posted the corresponding answer? Have you accurately posted the question?

First step in getting help with your question-post the actual question.
 
  • #3
answerseeker said:
2. 2HBr (g) <--> H2(g) + Br2 (g) initially, HBr is added to empty flask. how do rate of forward reaction and [HBr] change as system proceeds to eqm?
answer: forward rate increases and reverse rate increases.
I strongly suspect that this is not the answer to this question. Notice that the question says nothing about the rate of the reverse reaction and asks about [HBr] while the answer references the rate of the reverse reaction but not [HBr]. The answer to the first question can be explained like this: When [itex]NH_3[/itex] is first added, there is no [itex]H_2[/itex] or [itex]N_2[/itex], so there can be no reverse reaction. As the foward reaction proceeds more and more [itex]H_2[/itex] and [itex]N_2[/itex] begin appearing and reacting in the reverse reaction, increasing its rate. At the same time [itex]NH_3[/itex] is being used up, so there is less of it to react, slowing down the rate of the foward reaction.
 
  • #4
These are kinetic approach to equilbrium questions.

First, use Le Chateliers Principle to find out what will happen to the equilibrium in both cases (note volume change during reactions).

Then think how rates of reaction must change in order for the system to move in the direction of new equlibrium state.

And - as it was already said - check out the second question and the second answer, as there is something fishy about them.
 
  • #5
The source from which i acquired the question from had a typo. I checked another source with the same question and here is the correct answer: forward reaction decrease as [HBr] decreases. i understand the answer quite clearly now.

but have another query: for reaction kinetics, when monitoring the change in a closed system, would you only look at the reactant side for the change?

also, are homogenous rxns slower than heterogenous?
 
  • #6
answerseeker said:
but have another query: for reaction kinetics, when monitoring the change in a closed system, would you only look at the reactant side for the change?
Changes in the reactant side are related to changes in the product side through the stoichiometry of the reaction. For instance :

[tex]2HBr \leftrightarrow H_2 + Br_2 [/tex]

Consuming 2 moles of HBr produces a mole each of H2 and Br2. So, removing any x moles of HBr yields an increase by x/2 moles each of H2 and Br2.

[tex]\Delta [H_2] = \Delta [Br_2] = -\frac {1}{2} \Delta [HBr] [/tex]

[tex] \implies \frac {d}{dt} [H_2] = \frac {d}{dt} [Br_2] = -\frac {1}{2} \frac {d}{dt}
[HBr] [/tex]
 
  • #7
consider: FeO (s) + H2 (g) <--> Fe(s) + H2O (g)

which describes the effect that a decrease in volume would have on the position of equilibrium and the

in the above system?

answer: No shift,

increases.

I was wondering why the

increases even when there is no shift in the equilibrium.

thx

 
  • #8
answerseeker said:
I was wondering why the

increases


This is because H2 is a smaller molecule than H2O. Equilibrium can shifts with temperature, pressure, increase/decrease of chemcials, volume etc. and also the size or number of molecules.

As the volume has decreases, there is less room so more H2 is produced. However:
answerseeker said:
I was wondering why the

increases even when there is no shift in the equilibrium.



This is your question and I cannot fully answer it. To me, there should be a shift to the left due, to the molecule size and an increase in pressure (due to decrease in volume). I am afraid I cannot guess why there is no shift. For this, I apologise.

The Bob (2004 ©)

 
  • #9
To first order (ie: treating H2O and H2 as ideal gases) a reduction of the volume should have no effect on

, because ...

Once again, the provided answer is (partly) wrong. :grumpy:

 
  • #10
as i see that the source's answers are not reliable, I will no longer post Q/A from that source... altho i appreciate the attempts to help me solve those defective problems.
 

1. What is chemical equilibrium?

Chemical equilibrium is the state in which the concentration of reactants and products in a chemical reaction remain constant over time. This means that the forward and reverse reactions are occurring at the same rate, resulting in no net change in the overall amount of reactants and products.

2. How is chemical equilibrium different from a chemical reaction?

A chemical reaction involves the conversion of reactants into products, whereas chemical equilibrium occurs when the concentrations of reactants and products remain constant over time. In a chemical reaction, the reaction continues until one of the reactants is fully consumed, while in chemical equilibrium, both the forward and reverse reactions are occurring simultaneously.

3. What factors can affect the position of chemical equilibrium?

The position of chemical equilibrium can be affected by changes in temperature, pressure, and concentration of reactants and products. Adding or removing reactants or products, changing the temperature, or altering the pressure can shift the equilibrium in either the forward or reverse direction.

4. Can chemical equilibrium be disturbed?

Yes, chemical equilibrium can be disturbed by changing the concentration of reactants or products, or by changing the temperature or pressure. When a disturbance is introduced, the equilibrium will shift to counteract the change and maintain a constant ratio of reactants to products.

5. How can we calculate the equilibrium constant for a reaction?

The equilibrium constant, represented as K, is calculated by dividing the concentration of products raised to the power of their coefficients by the concentration of reactants raised to the power of their coefficients. This can be done using the equilibrium expression for the reaction, which is written using the concentrations of reactants and products at equilibrium.

Similar threads

  • Chemistry
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • Biology and Chemistry Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • Biology and Chemistry Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top