Foucault's Pendulum: Reviews & Comparisons to Da Vinci Code

  • Thread starter The_Professional
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Pendulum
In summary, Foucault's Pendulum is a cerebral book that has been compared to the The Da Vinci Code. It is a heavy read, but is well worth the effort.
  • #1
The_Professional
427
1
foucault's pendulum has drawn some comparisons to the da vinci code. based on reviews the writing is more cerebral and requires you to have a dictionary as you read through.

has anybody read it? what do you think of it?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I loved The Name of the Rose and Baudolino, I never got past the first few pages of Foucault's Pendulum though.
 
  • #3
I loved Foucault's Pendulum as well as The Name of the Rose. Foucault's Pendulum was hard-going, though...
 
  • #4
The Rule of Four was a De Vinci Code wannabe that wasn't bad. It was the first work by the particular authors and it showed but other than that not bad.
 
  • #5
Just read Foucault's Pendulum about a month ago. Amazing book - a real heavy read though.

As with comparisons to The Da Vinci Code goes, the Dan Brown book is like a kids book compared to Eco's book. Sure, both talk about the Templars, but Eco's goes so much more deeper into the legends and myths.

The book is extremely rich in detail and you can see Eco has done some proper homework before putting pen to paper. Yes, a lot of the facts presented might be contested by scholars but on the whole, it's a solid piece of writing with much fewer eccentricities than Brown's novel.

Also, the book has a much better storyline than Brown's book. After I read it, I felt good and that I accomplished something. The story was awesome and I felt that at the end, I actually did something worthwhile.

With Brown's book; yes, I was fascinated by it but after Googling for an hour or two after I'd read the book, the book is not such a miraculous novel as I once thought it was.

If you have the time (and more importantly, the patience) read Foucualt's Pendulum. It is a MUCH MUCH better book than The Da Vinci Code. And if you do intend reading both books, read The Da Vinci Code first:smile:

:rolleyes: Oh, and you'll need a comprehensive Encyclopaedia, not a dictionary. I sat with my GPRS enabled cellphone and Googled everything I didn't understand whilst reading Foucault's Pendulum! :rolleyes:
 
  • #6
Speaking of books anyone read "garden of beasts" Truely amazing book and I recommend it, PreWW2 History in Germany and a thriller rolled into one..
 
  • #7
Shahil said:
Just read Foucault's Pendulum about a month ago. Amazing book - a real heavy read though.
As with comparisons to The Da Vinci Code goes, the Dan Brown book is like a kids book compared to Eco's book. Sure, both talk about the Templars, but Eco's goes so much more deeper into the legends and myths.
The book is extremely rich in detail and you can see Eco has done some proper homework before putting pen to paper. Yes, a lot of the facts presented might be contested by scholars but on the whole, it's a solid piece of writing with much fewer eccentricities than Brown's novel.
Also, the book has a much better storyline than Brown's book. After I read it, I felt good and that I accomplished something. The story was awesome and I felt that at the end, I actually did something worthwhile.
With Brown's book; yes, I was fascinated by it but after Googling for an hour or two after I'd read the book, the book is not such a miraculous novel as I once thought it was.
If you have the time (and more importantly, the patience) read Foucualt's Pendulum. It is a MUCH MUCH better book than The Da Vinci Code. And if you do intend reading both books, read The Da Vinci Code first:smile:
:rolleyes: Oh, and you'll need a comprehensive Encyclopaedia, not a dictionary. I sat with my GPRS enabled cellphone and Googled everything I didn't understand whilst reading Foucault's Pendulum! :rolleyes:
Awesome review. I think I'll have to look it up. I've read Angels&Demons and Deception Point. I haven't read the De Vinci Code yet because Dan Brown just doesn't really do anything for me. I'm happy to know that there are authors who write in the same themes and do it well.
 
  • #8
I loved The Name of the Rose, the metaphors and atmosphere, so really looked forward to reading Foucault's Pendulum when I did about 5 years ago. I was disapointed, although full of interesting concepts like Cabala, it went nowhere. It really felt like a big waist of time. I haven't read the Da Vinci Code because I'm sure I would be disapointed with it too.:smile:
 
  • #9
I've read all Dan Browns books, all of them were brilliant reads. The best by far was Illuminati (Angles and demons in English)
 
  • #10
Anttech said:
I've read all Dan Browns books, all of them were brilliant reads. The best by far was Illuminati (Angles and demons in English)
Maybe I will try them after all :smile:
 
  • #11
Anttech said:
I've read all Dan Browns books, all of them were brilliant reads. The best by far was Illuminati (Angles and demons in English)
Are you kidding? In Angels & Demons he didn't even refer at all to the real history of the Illuminati and only barely touched on the more dubious conspiracy theory histories. Most of it he just made up. The funiest part is that the Illuminati was disbanded by the Jesuits yet Brown takes you to Vatican City and somehow fails to ever mention the Jesuits.
Deception point was worse. He claimed that all the technology he depicted was real when from what I can tell most of it had to be fantasy. And secondly, while a good portion of the plot revolved around a presidential election campaign, the Vice President was never mentioned once nor was a running mate mentioned for the other candidate.:confused:
He knows how to make a story move, though his methods here get a little old, and his plots aren't bad. That's about all I'll give him as an author though.
 
  • #12
some critics would argue that brown's earlier books were subpar then progressively got better from angels and demons to the da vinci code.
 
  • #13
I read the first few paragraphs of Foucault..., cringed at the slaughter of mathematics at the hands of poetic licence, and never looked at the book again.
 
  • #14
Gokul43201 said:
I read the first few paragraphs of Foucault..., cringed at the slaughter of mathematics at the hands of poetic licence, and never looked at the book again.

why, it should be an entertaining read at the very least.
 
Last edited:
  • #15
my rare hardcover just arrived today, and will embark on this journey as soon as i finish 3 other books, hah. wish me luck
 
  • #16
Gokul43201 said:
I read the first few paragraphs of Foucault..., cringed at the slaughter of mathematics at the hands of poetic licence, and never looked at the book again.

I think that's all the "maths" Mr. Eco delves into if I remember right. I don't know though...the book was a worthwhile read you know. I did get a bit irritated at times but I persisted and I think it paid of. Kinda like that Lar Von Trier (or whatever his name is .. he made the movie "dancer in the dark" staring bjork) movie 'Dogville' staring Nicole Kidman. Set was crap, it moved sooooooooo slowly and it was about 3.5 hours long. I sat through it and by the end, I was glad I did.

WOrks for some people, and not for others I guess...
 
  • #17
As for Dan Brown's books, I only liked the Da Vinci Code, and Angels and Demons. The only one I haven't read was Digital Fortress. Looks like I'll be reading Focult's Pendulum, an The Rule of Four.
 
  • #18
I remember reading Foucalt's Pendulum, it didn't make any sense to me until about 100 pages in but then I found it fascinating. I just got it and re-read it, picking up a lot of things I missed the first time. Definately a heavy read. Then I also read The Island Before Time by Eco, another good complicated but interesting book.
 
  • #19
Eco's book is more subtle (it put me to sleep a few times) than 'Da code'; however, The Da Vinci Code is more readable. It has more action and moves at a faster pace. I should probably reread Eco's 'Pendulum' too. I think I missed a lot also. The Island before Time... sounds interesting.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #20
The Island Before Time is about the international dateline, sort of. It is back in the middle ages and mixed in with the search for longitude. Quite interesting.
 
  • #21
Doesn't Eco have a new book out "The Mysterious Flame of Queen Loana" Has anyone read it yet?
 
  • #22
Is Foucault's Pendulum full of suspense?
 
  • #23
Slight suspense.

DVC is a close resemblance, but as said previously, Foucault's Pendulum goes far more into details and such.

Good book, IMHO. Also, if you like that book, you should read The Heart or the Rose(I believe). ^_^
 
  • #24
Blahness said:
Good book, IMHO. Also, if you like that book, you should read The Heart or the Rose(I believe). ^_^

you mean the 'name of the rose'. probably the only one of eco's books that has been made into a movie. the film's a bit dated and sean connery still looks like he does now.
 
  • #25
Name of the rose, that's right.

Damn my bad memory. X.x'
 

What is Foucault's Pendulum?

Foucault's Pendulum is a scientific demonstration of the Earth's rotation. It consists of a long pendulum suspended from a fixed point that swings back and forth in a straight line while the Earth rotates beneath it.

How is Foucault's Pendulum related to the Da Vinci Code?

The Da Vinci Code, a novel by Dan Brown, mentions Foucault's Pendulum as a tool used by the Knights Templar to communicate secret messages. However, this is simply a fictional plot device and has no basis in reality.

What are some differences between Foucault's Pendulum and the Da Vinci Code?

While both Foucault's Pendulum and the Da Vinci Code involve the Knights Templar, they are very different in their approach to the subject. Foucault's Pendulum is a scientific experiment, while the Da Vinci Code is a work of fiction filled with historical inaccuracies and conspiracies.

Why is Foucault's Pendulum often compared to the Da Vinci Code?

Foucault's Pendulum and the Da Vinci Code are often compared because they both involve the Knights Templar and their supposed involvement in secret societies and hidden messages. However, as mentioned before, the two are vastly different in their approach and purpose.

What are some of the scientific criticisms of the Da Vinci Code's portrayal of Foucault's Pendulum?

Scientists have criticized the Da Vinci Code for its inaccurate portrayal of Foucault's Pendulum. The novel suggests that the pendulum's motion can be controlled and used to send messages, which goes against the laws of physics and the actual purpose of the pendulum as a demonstration of the Earth's rotation.

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
941
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
320
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
19
Views
1K
Replies
53
Views
7K
  • General Discussion
Replies
5
Views
624
Replies
2
Views
724
  • Classical Physics
Replies
3
Views
919
  • General Discussion
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
1K
Replies
39
Views
3K
Back
Top