Does spacelike separation have anything to do with non-locality?

In summary: There is no information transfer.But all things come from t=0, meaning they could be fundamentally synchronised by virtue of the behaviour of spacetime in its early days.If things like ADS/CFT have any bearing on reality, then surely spacelike separated events aren't quite as separated as we think they are? Rather they would be perfectly coincidental.The idea that black holes are just the edges of the universe reflecting information back out is an interesting theory, but it is not widely accepted in the scientific community.Pair production in the multiverse is also a speculative concept and has not been proven to exist.Overall, the theory presented in this conversation suggests that the universe is constantly expanding and that eventually, all matter and information will
  • #1
dst
380
0
The cause-effect relationship of timelike events is fairly self-evident.

But I was wondering, do non-local effects of QM "synchronise" events that are separated along spacelike intervals? Could there be some kind of co-dependent arising, such that if event X happens in one region of the universe then event Y will certainly happen in a spacelike separated region?

There would be no information transfer and neither event can be said to have caused the other, because obviously what caused X is what caused X and what caused Y is what caused Y. But all things come from t=0, meaning they could be fundamentally synchronised by virtue of the behaviour of spacetime in its early days.

If things like ADS/CFT have any bearing on reality, then surely spacelike separated events aren't quite as separated as we think they are? Rather they would be perfectly coincidental.

I have an intuition that what we think are "black holes" are actually just the "edges"/"corners" of the universe reflecting information back out. These "edges" exist dynamically in relation to spacetime geometry, explaining why they appear and disappear at convenient points.

dst said:
Well, how about pair production in the multiverse?

That is to say, a 4D white hole and black hole pair form in a higher dimensional space.

Because they are pair produced, they exist in perfect equilibrium at t=0. No quantum fluctuations.

They would interact with their surroundings but the white hole would feed the black hole (us) so the black hole gets bigger and bigger. This would produce the appearance of inflation. When it gets to a tipping point, the white hole is now the black hole and the black hole is now the white hole, they become one "bubble" in the multiverse. At this point, the bubble is formed and can no longer be causally affected by fluctuations in the rest of the multiverse.

That would manifest as the "surface of last scattering"/the end of inflation. This would give off the appearance of a standalone 4D universe which has an "imprint" proportioning everything (the original quantum fluctuations imaged by the horizon).
Everything is rapidly moving away from us, faster and faster. Somewhere along the line there will be a point of no return. The time at which this point occurred depending on the geometry of our sphere of observation relative to the universe at large. The stars will fade into what we percieve as nothing. All that would remain is the causal trace of all the information present at the precise boundary where the acceleration finally overwhelmed the information supply. In the local geocentric universe, there will be just Earth, if it's still around as Earth and that would perhaps soon be ripped apart too depending on spacetime geometry at that point.
 
Last edited:
Space news on Phys.org
  • #2
dst said:
The cause-effect relationship of timelike events is fairly self-evident.

But I was wondering, do non-local effects of QM "synchronise" events that are separated along spacelike intervals? Could there be some kind of co-dependent arising, such that if event X happens in one region of the universe then event Y will certainly happen in a spacelike separated region?
Nope. Quantum mechanics is fully-local. It has some effect which appear to be non-local, but all of the dynamics are fully local.
 

1. What is spacelike separation?

Spacelike separation refers to the distance between two events in space that are not connected by a cause-and-effect relationship. In other words, the events occur too far apart in space for any information or influence to travel between them.

2. How does spacelike separation relate to non-locality?

Spacelike separation is often used as a measure of non-locality, which refers to the idea that objects or events can be connected and influenced by each other without being physically connected. In quantum mechanics, this is known as quantum entanglement.

3. Can non-locality occur without spacelike separation?

No, non-locality requires spacelike separation in order for it to occur. Without a significant distance between the two events, there would be no need for the idea of non-locality.

4. What are some real-world examples of spacelike separation and non-locality?

A common example of spacelike separation and non-locality is the phenomenon of quantum entanglement, where two particles can become connected and share information regardless of the distance between them. Another example is the concept of action-at-a-distance in physics, where objects can influence each other without physical contact.

5. How does our understanding of spacelike separation and non-locality impact our understanding of the universe?

The study of spacelike separation and non-locality has greatly expanded our understanding of the universe, particularly in the field of quantum mechanics. It has challenged our traditional understanding of causality and the limitations of distance in affecting objects or events. It also has implications for the potential for faster-than-light communication and the interconnectedness of all things in the universe.

Similar threads

Replies
29
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
700
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
67
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
6
Replies
175
Views
6K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
9
Views
482
Replies
6
Views
771
Replies
13
Views
2K
Back
Top