Having trouble with Standard Error of the Mean

In summary, when considering the best estimate of the true mean height (170.18cm) of the population of Bioinformatics students, it is important to take into account the error and variation that occur in statistical measurements. While the Sample with the lower SEM would be expected to have a Sample Mean closer to the Population Mean, this is not always the case. It is possible for a Sample with a larger SEM to have a Sample Mean closer to the Population Mean. In such cases, pooling the data from multiple samples can result in a more accurate estimate, as seen in the calculation of the Pooled Sample Mean and SEM. Ultimately, the Sample Mean with the smallest SEM would be the best estimate of the true mean height of the population.
  • #1
maccaman
49
0
Question 8 - From your results above, which would be the best estimate of the true mean
height (170.18cm) of the population of Bioinformatics students? Explain!



I am having a little trouble on this question and what exactly is it. It is asking me for which would be the best estimate of the true mean. Now the results above are as follows:

Sample 1
n = 15
mean = 171.06
s = 9.46
SEM = 2.44

Sample 2
n = 23
mean = 172.13
s = 8.59
SEM = 1.79

I am a little hazy as what i should write, as you would think the lower SEM would result in a closer estimate of the true mean, however the larger SEM actually has a mean closer to the true mean than Sample 2. Any help on this would be greatly appreciated. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
maccaman said:
Question 8 - From your results above, which would be the best estimate of the true mean
height (170.18cm) of the population of Bioinformatics students? Explain!



I am having a little trouble on this question and what exactly is it. It is asking me for which would be the best estimate of the true mean. Now the results above are as follows:

Sample 1
n = 15
mean = 171.06
s = 9.46
SEM = 2.44

Sample 2
n = 23
mean = 172.13
s = 8.59
SEM = 1.79

I am a little hazy as what i should write, as you would think the lower SEM would result in a closer estimate of the true mean, however the larger SEM actually has a mean closer to the true mean than Sample 2. Any help on this would be greatly appreciated. Thanks
Your comments demonstrate some fundamental characteristics of statistical measurements: that error and variation always occur, and that most statistical "interpretations" are only valid ON AVERAGE.

You are certainly correct in stating that the Sample with lower SEM would be expected to have Sample Mean closer to the Population Mean. However, the critical word here is "expected". Only ON AVERAGE will that be true. It is always possible (shown clearly in this example) that a Sample with larger SEM might actually (sometimes) have Sample Mean closer to the Population Mean than another Sample (from the same population) with smaller SEM. This is what statistics is all about, and why care should be used when interpreting results.

For the current situation, most statisticians would consider POOLING the data in order to achieve better overall SEM for the Pooled Sample mean. Consult your textbook for detailed discussion of this technique. For this example, the process would proceed like below:

Sample 1
n = 15
mean = 171.06
s = 9.46
SEM = 2.44

Sample 2
n = 23
mean = 172.13
s = 8.59
SEM = 1.79


STEP #1: Calculate Pooled Sample Mean "m" Value
mpool = {(15)*(171.06) + (23)*(172.13)}/(15 + 23) = (171.71)
STEP #2: Calculate Pooled Sample "s" Value
spool = sqrt{ {(15 - 1)*(9.46)2 + (23 - 1)*(8.59)2}/{15 + 23 - 2} } = (8.94)
STEP #3: Calculate Pooled Sample "SEM" Value
SEMpool = (8.94)/sqrt(15 + 23) = (1.45)

You can see that the Pooled Sample Mean is between those of the original Samples. However, the Pooled SEM is smaller than either of those from the original Samples. This shows another characteristic of Sample Means, namely that their SEMs generally become smaller with increasing Sample size. In this case, the smaller SEM would indicate ON AVERAGE that the Pooled Sample Mean would better approximate the Population Mean.


~~
 
Last edited:
  • #3




The best estimate of the true mean height of the population of Bioinformatics students would be the mean from Sample 1, which is 171.06cm. This is because Sample 1 has a smaller standard error of the mean (SEM) compared to Sample 2. The SEM is a measure of how much the sample mean varies from the true population mean. A smaller SEM indicates that the sample mean is more likely to be closer to the true population mean.

In this case, Sample 1 has an SEM of 2.44, while Sample 2 has an SEM of 1.79. Therefore, the mean from Sample 1 (171.06cm) is a more reliable estimate of the true mean height compared to the mean from Sample 2 (172.13cm).

It is important to note that the sample size also plays a role in determining the best estimate of the true mean. In this scenario, Sample 1 has a smaller sample size (n=15) compared to Sample 2 (n=23). Generally, as the sample size increases, the SEM decreases, resulting in a more precise estimate of the true mean. However, in this case, the difference in SEM between the two samples is significant enough to outweigh the effect of sample size.

In conclusion, the best estimate of the true mean height of the population of Bioinformatics students is 171.06cm, based on the smaller SEM value from Sample 1 compared to Sample 2.
 

What is the Standard Error of the Mean (SEM) and why is it important?

The Standard Error of the Mean is a measure of the variability or spread of sample means around the population mean. It is important because it helps us to estimate the true population mean, and therefore the accuracy and reliability of our sample data.

How is the Standard Error of the Mean calculated?

The SEM is calculated by dividing the standard deviation (SD) of the sample by the square root of the sample size (n). This accounts for the fact that larger sample sizes tend to have smaller variability and therefore a smaller SEM.

What does it mean if I have a high or low Standard Error of the Mean?

A high SEM indicates that there is a lot of variability in the data and the sample mean may not be a good estimate of the population mean. A low SEM indicates that there is little variability and the sample mean is likely a good estimate of the population mean.

What factors can affect the Standard Error of the Mean?

The SEM can be affected by the sample size, the variability of the data, and the presence of outliers. Generally, larger sample sizes and less variability result in a smaller SEM.

How can I improve the accuracy of my Standard Error of the Mean?

To improve the accuracy of the SEM, you can increase the sample size, reduce the variability in the data, and check for and remove any outliers. It is also important to ensure that the sample is representative of the population and is collected using appropriate methods.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
4
Views
777
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
987
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
7
Views
334
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
3
Views
839
Back
Top