C(reals) = C(P(naturals))?

  • Thread starter pjmunki
  • Start date
In summary, Cantor's set theory concludes that the cardinality of the set of real numbers is equal to the cardinal number of the power set of naturals, which is represented by 2^aleph0. This is because the elements of 2N can be mapped to sequences of 1's and 0's, just like the real numbers on [0,1] base 2. Although there is a slight issue with repeating decimals, it only occurs a countable number of times and can still be mapped to the set of real numbers. Therefore, |2N| = |R|.
  • #1
pjmunki
1
0
C(reals) = C(P(naturals))??

hello,
Could someone help me please.
I am studying Cantor's set theory at present, but am a little confused as to why he concludes that the cardinality of the set of real numbers is equal to the cardinal number of the power set of naturals (2^aleph0).

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The elements of 2N can be treated as sequences of 1's and 0's where a sequence corresponding to a subset A of N has a 1 in the n th position if n is in A.

You should have no trouble seeing that this mapping is bijective.

Now, if you look at the real numbers on [0,1] base 2, you get numbers like:
0.10101011101000110...
which are also sequences of ones and zeros. So there's a natural mapping.

Unfortunately there is a problem because
0.011111111111111111111111...=
0.100000000000000000000000...
in the reals.

But that only occurs a countable number of (N) times. So we can certainly construct a bijection to [0,1] + N.

So we have |2N| = |[0,1] + N|

but you should already know that |[0,1] + N|=|[0,1]|=|R|
(Cantor certainly did)

So by substitution we get:
|2N |=|R|
 
Last edited:
  • #3


According to Cantor's theorem, the cardinality of the set of real numbers (C(reals)) is equal to the cardinality of the power set of naturals (C(P(naturals))). This means that for every real number, there exists a unique subset of naturals and vice versa.

To understand this, we need to first understand the concept of cardinality. Cardinality refers to the number of elements in a set. In other words, it is a measure of the size of a set. Cantor's theorem states that if two sets have the same cardinality, then they are considered to be of equal size.

Now, let's look at the set of real numbers. We know that real numbers are infinite and uncountable. This means that we cannot assign a natural number to each real number, as we can with the set of natural numbers. This is where the concept of power set comes into play. The power set of a set is the set of all possible subsets of that set.

In the case of the set of naturals, the power set (P(naturals)) includes all the possible subsets of naturals, including the empty set and the set of all naturals. This set is also infinite and uncountable, just like the set of real numbers.

So, if we think about it, for every real number, there exists a unique subset of naturals that corresponds to it. This means that the cardinality of the set of real numbers (C(reals)) is equal to the cardinality of the power set of naturals (C(P(naturals))).

In conclusion, C(reals) = C(P(naturals)) because there is a one-to-one correspondence between the elements of these two sets. I hope this helps to clarify the concept for you.
 

1. What does "C(reals) = C(P(naturals))" mean?

"C(reals) = C(P(naturals))" is a mathematical notation that represents the cardinality, or size, of the set of real numbers being equal to the cardinality of the power set of the set of natural numbers. In simpler terms, it means that the number of elements in the set of real numbers is the same as the number of subsets in the set of natural numbers.

2. How is this equation useful in mathematics?

This equation is useful in mathematics as it helps us understand the infinite nature of both the set of real numbers and the power set of the set of natural numbers. It also has applications in set theory, logic, and algebra.

3. Can you provide an example to illustrate this equation?

One example of this equation in action is the fact that the set of real numbers and the set of irrational numbers have the same cardinality. This means that even though the set of irrational numbers is a proper subset of the set of real numbers, they both have the same number of elements.

4. Is it possible for two sets with different cardinalities to be equal?

No, two sets with different cardinalities cannot be equal. The cardinality of a set is a unique property that determines its size, and if two sets have different cardinalities, it means they have a different number of elements and therefore cannot be equal.

5. How is this equation related to infinity?

This equation is related to infinity in the sense that both the set of real numbers and the power set of the set of natural numbers are infinite sets. However, they have different levels of infinity, with the set of real numbers being "larger" than the power set of the set of natural numbers.

Similar threads

  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
7
Views
311
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
5
Views
996
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top