Volume of region bounded by cone and parabloid

In summary, the question asks to find the volume of the region bounded by the cone z=sqrt((x*x)+(y*y)) and the parabloid z=(x*x)+(y*y), which can be represented in polar coordinates as z= √(r2) and z= r2. By setting up the integral in polar coordinates and evaluating it, the volume is found to be π/6.
  • #1
adi_butler
4
0
I don't know if anyone will be able to help me, I am really stuck on this question!

"Show that the volume of the region bounded by the cone
z=sqrt((x*x)+(y*y)) and the parabloid z=(x*x)+(y*y) is
PI/6"

The bits in the brackets (ie x*x and y*y) are x squared and y squared respectively and sqrt is square root.

Any help would be very much appreciated!

Cheers,

Adi
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
[tex]
\int \sqrt{(x^2 + y^2)} - (x^2 + y^2) dx
=~30\deg
[/tex]
 
  • #3
Originally posted by PrudensOptimus
[tex]
\int \sqrt{(x^2 + y^2)} - (x^2 + y^2) dx
=~30\deg
[/tex]

30 degrees?
 
  • #4
Pi/6 is not 30 degrees. Pi/6 radians is 30 degrees. And you set up the integral wrong. There's more than one variable.
 
  • #5
Those two guys intersect at z=1, directly above the circle (on the x-y plane) x2 + y2 = 1, and at the origin.
Within that region, (i.e. inside the cylinder x2 + y2 = 1) the surface of the cone lies above the surface of the paraboloid, so you want the volume bounded by the cone, the cylinder, and the plane z=0
MINUS the volume bounded by the cylinder, the paraboloid, and the plane z=0.

Put your two equations into polar coordinate form & you'll have two very simple double integrals that will give you the result you're looking for.
 
  • #6
In cylindrical coordinates (in other words, the polar coordinates gnome recommended), the bounding surfaces are z= √(r2)= r (since r is positive in polar coordinates) and z= r2. You "z-difference" between the two surfaces is r- r2. The differential in polar coordinates is r dr dθ. Since there is no θ in the integrand and we have circular symmetry, the integral with respect to theta is 2π. This is the integral 2π(r2- r3)dr. The anti derivative of r2- r3 is (1/3)r3- (1/4)4.

Since z= r and z= r2 intersect at r= 1, the integration is from 0 to 1. (1/3)r3- (1/4)4 evaluated between 0 and 1 is (1/3)- (1/4)= 1/12.

The volume is 2π/12= π/6.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

What is the formula for finding the volume of a region bounded by a cone and a paraboloid?

The formula for finding the volume of a region bounded by a cone and a paraboloid is V = (1/3)πr^2h + (1/2)πa^2h, where r is the radius of the base of the cone, h is the height of the cone, and a is the distance from the vertex of the paraboloid to the center of the base of the cone.

How do you determine the limits of integration for finding the volume of a region bounded by a cone and a paraboloid?

The limits of integration for finding the volume of a region bounded by a cone and a paraboloid depend on the orientation of the shapes and the coordinate system being used. In general, the limits will be the intersection points of the two shapes and the vertex of the paraboloid.

Can the volume of a region bounded by a cone and a paraboloid be negative?

No, the volume of a region bounded by a cone and a paraboloid cannot be negative. The volume represents a physical quantity and cannot have a negative value.

What is the difference between a cone and a paraboloid?

A cone is a three-dimensional shape with a circular base and a pointed top, while a paraboloid is a three-dimensional shape with a circular base and a curved surface that opens upward or downward. The main difference between the two is the shape of their surfaces.

How does the volume of a region bounded by a cone and a paraboloid change when the dimensions of the shapes are altered?

The volume of a region bounded by a cone and a paraboloid is directly proportional to the dimensions of the shapes. This means that if the dimensions of the shapes are increased, the volume will also increase, and if they are decreased, the volume will decrease. However, the exact change in volume will depend on the specific dimensions being altered.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
9K
Replies
4
Views
322
Replies
3
Views
305
  • Calculus
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Calculus
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Calculus
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top