New Reply

Is speed of light relative to "eather" flow?

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Jun29-12, 08:06 PM   #18
 

Is speed of light relative to "eather" flow?


Quote by tensor33 View Post
That is correct. However, it is true for any point in space. There is no special point that is the center of the universe, any point in space can be considered the center. This is called the cosmological principle.
Quote by phinds View Post
Yeah, I think I got carried away by the use of the terms "radius" and "universe" together and immediate said to my self, NO ... that's the OBSERVABLE universe (which HAS a radius), not "the universe" which does not have a radium, but you are of course correct. Any point anywhere is the center of its own observable universe
Just a point of clarification. There is an obvious distinction between observable universe and total universe. But if we assume global (total universe) isotropy and homogeneity it seems to me that tensor33's unqualified statement above, is not only valid as it stands but is a logical necessity. IMHO
I.e. Any point must be considered the center of the total universe.
What do you think?
Jun29-12, 08:09 PM   #19
 
Quote by schiz0ai View Post
eather
What's this?
Jun29-12, 09:20 PM   #20
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Quote by Austin0 View Post
Just a point of clarification. There is an obvious distinction between observable universe and total universe. But if we assume global (total universe) isotropy and homogeneity it seems to me that tensor33's unqualified statement above, is not only valid as it stands but is a logical necessity. IMHO
I.e. Any point must be considered the center of the total universe.
What do you think?
Yes, if the universe is infinite in extent. My own belief is that it likely is, but I figure my personal belief with no facts to back it up is worthless, and I don't have any. Since the topology of the universe is unknown, I'm hesitant to say that EVERYWHERE is the center although it may well be.

If the universe is finite but unbounded, I don't know enough about possible topologies to understand whether the statement would always hold or not.
Jun29-12, 09:57 PM   #21
 
Quote by phinds View Post
Yes, if the universe is infinite in extent. My own belief is that it likely is, but I figure my personal belief with no facts to back it up is worthless, and I don't have any. Since the topology of the universe is unknown, I'm hesitant to say that EVERYWHERE is the center although it may well be.

If the universe is finite but unbounded, I don't know enough about possible topologies to understand whether the statement would always hold or not.
Yeah me too as far as lacking in facts or any knowledge of whats really out there.
I apologize if I projected any unwarranted certainty of the reality in this regard.

I did not mean to imply that the statement was necessarily true in reality. Only that based on our current models and theories it was a logical consequence without any theoretical reason for denying it.
Not even that I particularly believe it. I think that it is not only you and I lacking in factual basis for prediction but it is the case for all theoretical speculation at this point regarding the topology and nature of the universe as a whole or even within our observable slice.
We seem to be stuck with using creative imagination and logic in seeking answers to many questions IMO
Jun29-12, 10:31 PM   #22
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Quote by Austin0 View Post
Yeah me too as far as lacking in facts or any knowledge of whats really out there.
I apologize if I projected any unwarranted certainty of the reality in this regard.

I did not mean to imply that the statement was necessarily true in reality. Only that based on our current models and theories it was a logical consequence without any theoretical reason for denying it.
Not even that I particularly believe it. I think that it is not only you and I lacking in factual basis for prediction but it is the case for all theoretical speculation at this point regarding the topology and nature of the universe as a whole or even within our observable slice.
We seem to be stuck with using creative imagination and logic in seeking answers to many questions IMO
I agree w/ you in general, with the strong exception that I completely DISagree regarding the observable universe, which is well known to be flat to within our ability to measure it.

Personally I find it REALLY unlikely that out of all the possible values of curvature that the observable universe could take, it is flat to within our ability to measure it but NOT actually totally flat. That is, I'll be surprized should it turn out that the observable universe is not flat, and of course that has a huge ramification because if the OU is exactly flat, then so is the total universe (well ... there IS some argument about that conclusion but I'm dubious about the arguments).
New Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Is speed of light relative to "eather" flow?
Thread Forum Replies
Those "moving near speed of light simulation" videos Special & General Relativity 4
Your opinion on"exceeding the speed of light means the ability to return to the past" Special & General Relativity 47
On "Microwave oven to measure light of speed". To falsify Classical Physics 0
The speed of light, the term "light year", and reference frames. Astrophysics 8
"Using light to see the world requires speed of light to be maximum?" Special & General Relativity 23