## causal signals and causal system

Is there a difference between causal signal and causal system ?
I got this doubt because

consider a system h(t) whose out put depends on present and past inputs only for all t (- infinity to + infinity ) so this system is a causal system

now if we treat this as a signal and since it exists from -infinity to+ infinity so it will be a non-causal signal. . . .

which one is correct ?
 PhysOrg.com engineering news on PhysOrg.com >> Sensitive bomb detector to rove in search of danger>> PNNL-developed injection molding process recognized with emerging technologies award>> How soon could car seats enter the 3-D comfort zone?
 Causality in systems makes the most sense. Causality in signals doesn't make that much sense. Causality in systems determines whether a system relies on future information of a signal x[n+1]. When talking about "causality" in signals, we mean whether they are zero to the left of t=0 or zero to the right of t=0. A causal signal is zero for t<0 A non-causal zero has values present for t<0. Anti-causal signals are zero for t>0. However, the reason why this doesn't really make sense is that if you have a signal, the time t=0 can be chosen arbitrarily.
 Got it :) thank you for clarifying :)

 Tags causal, fourier, hilbert, laplace, signals