If earth's poles are reversed suddenly

  • Thread starter yeahhyeahyeah
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Poles
In summary: V/m to be created inside the ring?In summary, the magnetic flux in low Earth orbit at the equator will be negative/opposite of whatever the last answer was, due to the sudden change in field.
  • #1
yeahhyeahyeah
30
0

Homework Statement



Consider the Earth’s magnetic field as that of a dipole with the magnetic field around the equator having magnitude 30 µT. The radius of the Earth is 6.37 106 m.
a. Calculate the magnetic flux φB in low Earth orbit (r=6.5x10^6 m) at the equator, in units of Tm2.

b. Suppose the field (for some reason) suddenly reverses direction. What is the magnitude of the change of φB?

Homework Equations



flux = integral(B dA)

The Attempt at a Solution



The flux in low Earth orbit at the equator: I think this means the flux through the area of the ring surrounding the Earth from the surface up to r=6.5x10^6 m. The flux would then be the area of that ring times the given magnetic field, I think?
Then the flux, if the field reverses, is just going to be negative/opposite of whatever the last answer was, right? I do not know if I'm doing this wrong or not :X
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
This is odd, they don't really define what area to use. The field is 30 µT at the equator, but inside the Earth it will be different. So you can't really calculate the flux through a circle given by the Earth's radius.

And yes, if the field reverses then the flux is just the opposite of what it was before.
 
  • #3
I looked up "low Earth orbit" and that's supposed to be the locus of points from the surface up to about 6.5x10^6. For my area, I used the area between the larger circle and the smaller, surface one. I used a uniform magnetic field though. I just got back from spring break though and I can't even remember how the magnetic field varies a distance from a dipole though.
Thanks for your reply
My professor writes these questions himself so that's why its not too clear/might have mistakes
 
  • #4
Okay, I didn't catch that there were two different radii given in the problem statement. Yes, using the area in between is probably what was intended.

Since the two radii are fairly close, B will not vary significantly throughout the area. So the 30 µT value will be fine.

For (b), not sure if this is clear: they are not asking for the flux after B changes direction. They are asking by how much the flux changes.
 
  • #5
Fwiw, my reading of the problem is that they may want the B field at the low Earth orbit distance, which you can calculate with the two different radii and ground level B at the equator. The |B| over a square meter then is flux/per square meter?

Surely they don't want total global flux?
 
  • #6
thanks! that makes sense
 
  • #7
yeahhyeahyeah said:
a. Calculate the magnetic flux φB in low Earth orbit (r=6.5x10^6 m) at the equator, in units of Tm2.

Note the units here, T m2 is specifically requested.

LowlyPion said:
The |B| over a square meter then is flux/per square meter?

Surely they don't want total global flux?

But--flux per square meter is simply the magnetic field, 30 µT as given in the problem statement. I.e.,

(30 µT × 1 m2) / 1 m2

Hard to believe that's what they are after either, :confused: and it does not have the correct units of T m2.

I'm inclined to go with the total global flux on this.
 
  • #8
Redbelly98 said:
But--flux per square meter is simply the magnetic field, 30 µT as given in the problem statement.

30 µT is ground level. They want it at orbital height don't they? So you have the ratio magic to work with the radii. I think that's the point of the problem. Then when it reverses the change is twice what's calculated?

Otherwise what closed surface would you take? I will freely admit that I think the point of the problem is confusing to me any way.
 
  • #9
LowlyPion said:
30 µT is ground level. They want it at orbital height don't they? So you have the ratio magic to work with the radii.
That would make for a more meaningful problem. But then the statement about units is wrong.

Otherwise what closed surface would you take?

Good question. Taking the annular ring between rEarth and rorbit is pretty much a guess at this point.

I will freely admit that I think the point of the problem is confusing to me any way.

Agreed, same here. It seems like something is incorrect or incomplete about the problem statement.
 
  • #10
Err, oh well whatever, I just did
flux = B x area of annular ring

change in flux = 2 times above

And about the point of the problem, perhaps it would help to know that there is a final part that i didn't post because I thought I understood how to do it if I did the above correctly: it asks:

. If this field reversal occurs in a time ∆t, how small does ∆t have to be to cause an electric field of 1000 V/m in low Earth orbit (r=6.5 106m)?
 

1. What would happen to the Earth's magnetic field if the poles suddenly reversed?

If the Earth's poles suddenly reversed, the magnetic field would weaken and become disorganized for a period of time before stabilizing in the opposite direction. This could potentially leave the Earth more vulnerable to solar winds and cosmic rays.

2. Would there be any immediate effects on the Earth's climate if the poles suddenly reversed?

No, there would not be any immediate effects on the Earth's climate. The reversal of the poles would not have a direct impact on temperature or weather patterns. However, the weakening of the magnetic field could potentially affect the Earth's climate in the long run by allowing more solar radiation to reach the surface.

3. How long does it take for the Earth's poles to reverse?

The Earth's poles have reversed many times throughout its history, with the most recent one occurring about 780,000 years ago. The exact amount of time it takes for the poles to reverse is not known, but it is estimated to take anywhere from a few hundred to a few thousand years.

4. Would a pole reversal cause any physical damage to the Earth's surface?

No, a pole reversal would not cause any physical damage to the Earth's surface. It is a natural process that has occurred multiple times in the Earth's history and does not result in any catastrophic events.

5. How would a pole reversal affect technology and electronics?

A pole reversal could potentially disrupt some electronic systems that rely on the Earth's magnetic field, such as navigation systems. However, most modern technology is designed to withstand fluctuations in the Earth's magnetic field, so the impact would likely be minimal.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
213
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
686
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
944
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
919
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
836
Back
Top