Is Paradox the Key to Understanding the Ultimate Reality?

  • Thread starter Mohaamad
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Reality
In summary, Reality is often thought of as a subjective experience, but in defining it, we must look to the ultimate reality which serves as the source of causation for all that we see today. This ultimate reality is represented by paradoxes, which are inherent within themselves and serve as the ultimate logical conclusion. Paradoxes are a way for our minds to conceive of the nature of the ultimate explanation or source of reality. In this conversation, it is also mentioned that math logic does not always coincide with human logic, and when this happens, we call it a paradox.
  • #1
Mohaamad
Reality has connotations of a subjective experience to it. In defining reality; the ultimate reality will be the ultimate source of causation of all of the reality that we see today.

By paradox I mean as the paradoxes associated with quantum mechanics. Whatever drives the nature of things, the physical laws has to be an "ultimate" force. That is it cannot fail. Nothing "owns" this force and it can exist within itself, it does not "need" anything. A paradox is inherent within itself. All logical conclusions are interdependent on others and ultimately to a paradox. A paradox is a representation of an ultimate logical conclusion; no further derivation will be required simply because no further derivation can be achieved, it is the ultimate end, the ultimate reality because it has to be. I short, I can say that a paradox is a concept that our minds can use to concieve of the characteritic nature of what the ultimate explanation or source of reality is.

The "forces" that fuel the nature of things is a paradox. Paradox is a conceptualization of force.

God is a force, a paradox.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
I apologize if my english is difficult to understand.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
QM is just math.

Math logic does not have to coincide with "human logic" (the one which is obtained from limited everyday experience of "average" human).

So, when math logic does not coincide with "human" logic, then we call such non-coincidence by a word "paradox".

Change your logic.
 
  • #3
Originally posted by Alexander
QM is just math.

Math logic does not have to coincide with "human logic" (the one which is obtained from limited everyday experience of "average" human).

So, when math logic does not coincide with "human" logic, then we call such non-coincidence by a word "paradox".

Change your logic.

Quantum Mechanics is more than just math, it is the name we apply to a way of describing nature. Geometry is more than just math, it a word that we apply to a way of describing nature. Mathematics is more than just manipulating numbers and symbols, it is a word we apply to a way of describing nature. If any of these had no connection whatsoever to nature they would not exist.
 

1. What is "reality in an objective sense"?

"Reality in an objective sense" refers to the existence of things and events independent of our perceptions and interpretations. It is the idea that there is a shared, external reality that exists regardless of our subjective experiences.

2. How do we know if something is objectively real?

There is no definitive way to prove the objective reality of something. However, scientists use a combination of empirical evidence, logic, and replication of results to support the existence of an objective reality.

3. Can our perceptions and interpretations influence reality?

Yes, our perceptions and interpretations can influence our understanding and experience of reality. However, this does not necessarily mean that our perceptions and interpretations create or change the objective reality itself.

4. Are there different levels of reality?

Some philosophers and scientists propose the idea of multiple levels of reality, such as physical, mental, and social realities. These levels may interact and influence each other, but they are all considered part of the overall objective reality.

5. How does the concept of "reality in an objective sense" impact scientific research?

The concept of an objective reality is fundamental to the scientific method, as it allows for the study and understanding of the natural world. Scientists strive to minimize personal biases and subjective interpretations in their research in order to uncover objective truths about reality.

Similar threads

A Extended Wigner’s Friend Scenario and the existence of the reality
    • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
5
Views
2K
Why Popsci is Essential for a Well-Rounded Physics Education
    • General Discussion
Replies
17
Views
1K
Response to Mentat: what I believe to be a "paradox"
    • General Discussion
Replies
9
Views
2K
A Loophole-free test of local realism via Hardy's violation
    • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
2
Replies
37
Views
1K
B My paraphrased explanation of the Twin Paradox
    • Special and General Relativity
Replies
24
Views
2K
What is the paradox of the ultimate reality?
    • General Discussion
Replies
4
Views
3K
I QED/Quantum Mechanics: Probability or Spatial Function?
    • Quantum Physics
Replies
8
Views
1K
I Is this why a pilot wave theory cannot be accepted?
    • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
5
Views
938
Cool Optical Illusion and Our Created Reality
    • General Discussion
Replies
3
Views
2K
I Is the phrase "discrete spectrum" in rule #5 a contradiction in terms?
    • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
5
Views
831

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top