Near the End of A PhD and Have No Job

  • Thread starter Astro_Dude
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Job Phd
In summary, the conversation discusses the frustration of a PhD in physics who is struggling to find a job in industry, government, or academia. Despite having a strong resume and impressive research experience, the individual made the mistake of choosing to do their thesis in observational astronomy, which has limited transferability to other industries. They express their desire to start their career and their frustration with job postings that have unrealistic requirements and do not consider their skills and qualifications. The conversation also offers advice on marketing oneself and exploring various job search platforms.
  • #176
mal4mac said:
I'm not sure how universities work in the states, maybe the HR filter is more "up front" than in the UK. But, surely, professors looking to (say) program PDEs in C++ would stress to HR departments that numerical Fortran programmers are acceptable!

HR departments are extremely busy and they forget. Typically, you give someone with no-science experience a set of keywords, and if they see the keyword on the resume, then they pass it on.

It's also easier to work it the other way. If you have numerical skills in Fortran, spend a month programming some basic C++ and you can add that to your resume.

The other thing is that it's assumed (and usually assumed correctly) that if you can handle C++, you can handle anything.

"Working in a bar" doesn't look great on the CV - good for keeping people skills polished

You'd be surprised. Something that I have seen happen is that someone with something unusual on their resume gets an interview because of that unusual job.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #177
Astronuc said:
There is some evidence to suggest that OOP Fortran is more efficient than C++.

Yup. Unfortunately unlike straight fortran, no one seems to have gotten OOP Fortran to interoperate with all of the other OOP languages out there.

There is some evidence to suggest that OOP Fortran is more efficient than C++.

I wouldn't be surprised if Fortran objects were more efficient than C++ objects, but I'd be extremely surprised if this applies to templated C++. The thing about templates is that you can get rid of the pointer call which allows you to vectorize loops.
 
  • #178
Just a question:

I noticed that most of the job questions here are about hardcore theoretical physics, and how they should get jobs involving programming and finance.

However, there's a lot of physicists who do experimental work in things like condensed matter, who do not have a rigorous theoretical background and instead use commercial instruments to make measurements and the extent of programming required is Excel and maybe a bit of Mathematica.

How should experimentalists sell their skills, especially if its in a non-semiconductor materials field (biologicals, polymers, superconductors)?
 
  • #179
Just look at the things the company you're applying to needs. Characterization and testing are common ones - what type have you done and can do? Are you comfortable using/maintaining SEM/AFM etc?

Look at what projects you've started and completed and make them applicable to the work the employer does.
 
  • #180
chill_factor said:
Just a question:

However, there's a lot of physicists who do experimental work in things like condensed matter, who do not have a rigorous theoretical background and instead use commercial instruments to make measurements and the extent of programming required is Excel and maybe a bit of Mathematica.

How should experimentalists sell their skills, especially if its in a non-semiconductor materials field (biologicals, polymers, superconductors)?

I was once in the position you have described - I went from superconducting thin films (prototypes for microwave applications) to steel (samples from production). None of the characterization methods or software tools was exactly the same.

I used the following selling approach that worked out fine:

I emphasized the general approach in characterizing high-tech materials, that is: how to organize standardized measurements (you could call this "quality management"), consolidate results gained from different types of measurements (electrical, microstructure...) and use an efficient approach to compare the results with production parameters.
Efficiency is key - I believe that in industry you have to prove that you are capable to use tools most efficiently without "re-inventing the wheel" (programming or developing stuff from scratch this is already available - because tools are likely to be cheaper than you labour costs).

There is a lot of menial and organizational stuff involved, such as setting up the measurement process, creating sample forms in paper or in digital form, involving the lab technicians, thus motivating other people... You need to prove that you are a hands-on guy and not an "absent-minded professor who wants to do deal with real research only" (This is a bias you can sometimes find in industry and I personally tend to say it is not unjustified sometimes.) I was "forced" to do also project management and controlling at the university -finally this help a lot to underpin my "down-to-earth / real live" approach.

In addition I pointed out the similarities in measurement techniques, such as TEM vs. SEM, X-Ray diffraction versus TEM dark field, sample preparation using ion mills vs. sample preparation using laser ablation etc. I sold myself as a physicist with diverse experience in different measurement techniques that would allow me to use any related technique.
 
  • #181
Will you only get to do analytical work? Or are there other positions?
 
  • #182
chill_factor said:
Will you only get to do analytical work? Or are there other positions?

My post was probably misleading - I did not intend to say that typical job descriptions comprise measurements only. However, typically you would work on the development of a new product or optimization of an existing one. When developing new stuff for industry, standardized measurements, documentation and organizational stuff might effectively be what you do most of the time.
The significance of "compliance" with industry standards and legal requirements and related (buerocratic) efforts is still growing and so is the "paper work factor" in traditional engineering areas. The paper work factor typically also increases with the size of a company.

In terms of career path, you typically start as a specialist contributing to a project and move to a (project) management role later.
 
  • #183
Thank you!

I'm fine with doing paperwork and management. I just don't want to be doing analytical work all day, I would go for analytical chemistry if I did, since it's just... easier in all aspects...
 
<h2>What are some common reasons for not having a job at the end of a PhD?</h2><p>There are many possible reasons for not having a job at the end of a PhD. Some common reasons include a lack of available positions in your field, stiff competition for jobs, a mismatch between your skills and the job market, and a lack of networking and job search skills.</p><h2>How can I increase my chances of finding a job after completing my PhD?</h2><p>There are several steps you can take to increase your chances of finding a job after completing your PhD. These include networking with professionals in your field, gaining relevant work experience through internships or part-time jobs, developing strong communication and job search skills, and staying up-to-date with industry trends and developments.</p><h2>What should I do if I am struggling to find a job after my PhD?</h2><p>If you are struggling to find a job after your PhD, it can be helpful to seek advice and support from your academic advisors, career counselors, and other professionals in your field. They may be able to provide valuable insights and resources to help you in your job search.</p><h2>Are there alternative career options for PhD graduates?</h2><p>Yes, there are many alternative career options for PhD graduates. These may include positions in industry, government, non-profit organizations, consulting, and entrepreneurship. It is important to explore and consider all of your options to find the best fit for your skills, interests, and goals.</p><h2>What can I do to make my PhD more marketable to potential employers?</h2><p>To make your PhD more marketable to potential employers, you can focus on developing transferable skills such as communication, problem-solving, and project management. You can also gain relevant work experience through internships or part-time jobs, and actively participate in professional development opportunities such as conferences and workshops.</p>

What are some common reasons for not having a job at the end of a PhD?

There are many possible reasons for not having a job at the end of a PhD. Some common reasons include a lack of available positions in your field, stiff competition for jobs, a mismatch between your skills and the job market, and a lack of networking and job search skills.

How can I increase my chances of finding a job after completing my PhD?

There are several steps you can take to increase your chances of finding a job after completing your PhD. These include networking with professionals in your field, gaining relevant work experience through internships or part-time jobs, developing strong communication and job search skills, and staying up-to-date with industry trends and developments.

What should I do if I am struggling to find a job after my PhD?

If you are struggling to find a job after your PhD, it can be helpful to seek advice and support from your academic advisors, career counselors, and other professionals in your field. They may be able to provide valuable insights and resources to help you in your job search.

Are there alternative career options for PhD graduates?

Yes, there are many alternative career options for PhD graduates. These may include positions in industry, government, non-profit organizations, consulting, and entrepreneurship. It is important to explore and consider all of your options to find the best fit for your skills, interests, and goals.

What can I do to make my PhD more marketable to potential employers?

To make your PhD more marketable to potential employers, you can focus on developing transferable skills such as communication, problem-solving, and project management. You can also gain relevant work experience through internships or part-time jobs, and actively participate in professional development opportunities such as conferences and workshops.

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
6
Views
297
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
6
Views
916
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
4
Views
471
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • STEM Career Guidance
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
Back
Top