Using enthelpy when pressure is not constant

In summary: U + dKE + nRT(ln(V2/V1)) + dKE = 0In summary, the conversation discusses the use of enthalpy in different processes, particularly in adiabatic processes where the pressure is not constant. Enthalpy is defined as the change in internal energy and change in PV in a reversible process between two states. In a non-reversible adiabatic process, the change in enthalpy cannot be calculated using the same formula, as it assumes no change in entropy. The external pressure can be taken into account in the calculation of enthalpy, but it is not the same as the pressure of the gas. Enthalpy is also defined for solids
  • #1
timsea81
89
1
I started another post about this but I made things needlessly complicated by talking about non-ideal gasses. My question is equally valid for ideal gasses. Sorry for double-posting, but I can't figure out how to delete the old post.

If you do an energy balance for a control mass where there is no heat input, potential energy effects are negligible, and the only work interaction is work done by the systems on the surroundings through the expansion of the gas, you get
Q-W=dU+dKE+dPE
0-intPdV = dU + dKE + 0
0 = dU + int PdV + dKE

I see how if P is constant, the integral from state 1 to state 2 of PdV is
P*V(2)-P*V(1), and that
0 = P*V(2)-P*V(1) + U(2)-U(1) + KE(2) - KE(1)

which, since H=U+PV, reduces to
0 = H(2)-H(1) + KE(2)-KE(1)

But what happens when P is not constant? For example, when a gas escapes from a pressurized tank through a throttling valve? For this situation, if you look at some mass of air that escapes the tank, you can do an energy balance between state 1, when the air is motionless in the tank, and state 2, when the air is in motion and moving away from the valve. In this case P(1) does not equal P(2). Can you still use enthalpy the same way we did above?
Q-W=dU+dKE+dPE
0-intPdV = dU + dKE + 0
0 = dU + int PdV + dKE

can we say that dh=du+intPdV and write
0 = dH + dKE = H(2)-H(1) + KE(2) - KE(1)?

I don't understand the mathematics behind this, but it makes sense that you can look up enthalpy in tables and compare values at different pressures the same way you would under constant pressure.
 
Science news on Phys.org
  • #2
You're trying to use enthalpy in a situation where it is not particularly meaningful. You can always define H = U + PV and get dQ = dH + V dP. When P = const then ΔQ = ΔH, and so you can say the change in enthalpy is equal to the heat required for an isobaric process. This is useful.

But it sounds like you want to talk instead about an adiabatic process where P ≠ const, in which case ΔH = - ∫V dP. Sure you can calculate this quantity, or look it up in a table, but it has no simple interpretation.
 
  • #3
timsea81 said:
But what happens when P is not constant? For example, when a gas escapes from a pressurized tank through a throttling valve? For this situation, if you look at some mass of air that escapes the tank, you can do an energy balance between state 1, when the air is motionless in the tank, and state 2, when the air is in motion and moving away from the valve. In this case P(1) does not equal P(2). Can you still use enthalpy the same way we did above?
Enthalpy is a state function It can be a state function because it is defined as the change in internal energy and change in PV in a reversible process between two states:

[tex]\Delta H = \Delta U + \Delta (PV) = \Delta U + \int PdV + \int VdP = \Delta Q_{rev} + \int VdP = \int TdS + \int VdP[/tex]

In a non-reversible adiabatic process, such as this, you cannot use [itex]\Delta Q_{rev} = \int TdS = 0[/itex] in determining the change in enthalpy because this assumes that there is no change in entropy. In a free expansion of a gas, there is an increase in entropy.

AM
 
  • #4
H = U + PV and ΔH = ΔU + Δ(PV) have nothing to do with reversibility. As you say, they are state functions, defined by the initial and final conditions, not by any kind of process, reversible or not.

And I said Q = 0, which holds for any adiabatic process. Not ∫T dS = 0, which implies reversibility.
 
  • #5
Bill_K said:
H = U + PV and ΔH = ΔU + Δ(PV) have nothing to do with reversibility.
You are quite right that U and PV are state functions. If they were not, H could not be a state function. What I intended to say was that if you express entropy change in terms of heatflow, you have to use reversible heatflow. Since [itex]dH = dU + PdV + VdP[/itex], if you separate out the dU and PdV terms and equate their sum to dQ you can say [itex]dH = dQ +VdP => \Delta H = \Delta Q + \int VdP[/itex] ONLY IF [itex]\Delta Q = \Delta Q_{rev}[/itex].

And I said Q = 0, which holds for any adiabatic process. Not ∫T dS = 0, which implies reversibility.
I agree. But if you want to calculate [itex]\Delta H [/itex] in an irreversible adiabatic process you cannot use [itex]\Delta Q = 0[/itex] in the expression for enthalpy: [itex]\Delta H = \Delta Q + \int VdP[/itex]. This would mean that [itex]\Delta H = \int VdP[/itex] which is not correct. [itex]\Delta H = \int TdS + \int VdP[/itex] and for an irreversible adiabatic process, [itex]\int TdS \ne 0[/itex].

AM
 
  • #6
LS: as long as no distinction is made between the internal pressure an the external pressure this discussion will go the same way any piston would: nowhere.
The subject is adressed in the attachment zeppos10 placed elsewhere in this forum:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=88987&referrerid=219693.
Bill_K states: You're trying to use enthalpy in a situation where it is not particularly meaningful. I think it is particularly usefull, because p in H=U+pV is the external pressure.
 
  • #7
Zeppos10 said:
I think it is particularly usefull, because p in H=U+pV is the external pressure.
The P in PV is the pressure of the gas, not the external pressure.

AM
 
  • #8
Andrew Mason said:
The P in PV is the pressure of the gas, not the external pressure.
Enthalpy is also defined for solids and liquids, indeed for any system: how do you define p as in H=U+pV there ?
 
  • #9
use p=nRT/V the intPdV will be nRT(ln(V2/V1))
 

1. What is the relationship between enthalpy and pressure?

Enthalpy is a thermodynamic property that describes the total energy of a system. The relationship between enthalpy and pressure is that as pressure increases, the enthalpy of a system also increases. This is because an increase in pressure typically leads to an increase in the number of collisions and interactions between particles, resulting in a higher energy state.

2. How is enthalpy affected when pressure is not constant?

When pressure is not constant, the enthalpy of a system can still change. This is because enthalpy is also influenced by other factors such as temperature and volume. In a closed system, the change in enthalpy can be calculated using the formula ΔH = ΔU + PΔV, where ΔU is the change in internal energy and ΔV is the change in volume.

3. Can enthalpy be used to predict changes in temperature?

Yes, enthalpy can be used to predict changes in temperature. This is because enthalpy is directly related to the heat transferred in a system at constant pressure. By measuring the change in enthalpy, one can determine the amount of heat transferred and therefore predict the resulting change in temperature.

4. How does enthalpy affect chemical reactions?

Enthalpy plays a crucial role in chemical reactions. The change in enthalpy during a reaction, known as the enthalpy of reaction, can determine whether a reaction is exothermic (releases heat) or endothermic (absorbs heat). Additionally, enthalpy can also influence the rate of a reaction by affecting the activation energy required for the reaction to occur.

5. Is enthalpy a state function?

Yes, enthalpy is a state function, which means it only depends on the initial and final states of a system, not the path taken to get there. This allows us to use enthalpy to analyze and compare different systems, even if their individual processes may be different. In other words, the change in enthalpy between two states would be the same regardless of how the system got there.

Similar threads

Replies
31
Views
1K
  • Thermodynamics
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
620
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Thermodynamics
Replies
20
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top