Torque on a rotating charge due to a uniform magnetic field

In summary, the problem is trying to integrate a ball of charge with varying charge density in a uniform magnetic field.
  • #1
QuantumDefect
64
0
Hello, I need help with an integration. I found the torque on a ball of charge with varying charge density(dependant on the radial component) in a uniform magnetic field. I got

Integral[ (wxr)(r.B)(density)(r^2) sin(phi) d(theta) d(phi) dr, {r, 0,R}] where wxr is the cross product of the angular velocity and the radial component, r.B is the dot product between the radial component and the magnetic field. The trouble is integrating this monster, can anyone help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Well, for starters you would probably want to work out those cross and dot products in spherical coordinates. You also need to know the precise form of the charge density.
 
  • #3
Two quick things:

1) I think you may be missing a factor of 1/2.

2) Some simplifications can be obtained with the use of tensors, but you may not be comfortable with such tools. You could reduce the complexity of the integral a bit. Let me know if you would like to hear more.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
My goal is to have a scalar integral function of r with the angular velocity and B field in terms of vectors and a vector operation between the two, as I do not know the form of the charge density. My coordinate system is such that the angular velocity is along the z-axis. The B field is in an unknown direction, so it will have to still be in vector form. Any additional advice that you can give would be great. Thank you for your help.
 
Last edited:
  • #5
Ok then, QuantumDefect, how comfortable are you with tensors? If I start putting down indices and Levi-Civita symbols, will you be ok?

I shall assume for the moment that the answer is yes. The integral you're trying to do is [tex]\int d^3 x \rho(r) \left( \epsilon_{i j k} \hat{e}_i \omega_j x_k \right) \left( x_\ell B_\ell \right) [/tex] Since [tex] \hat{e}_i [/tex] is just a constant unit vector, you can take it outside. You can also take the constants [tex] \omega_j [/tex] and [tex] B_\ell [/tex] outside. So it boils down it down to evaluating the following integral, [tex] \int d^3 x \rho(r) x_k x_\ell [/tex] over a sphere of radius [tex] R [/tex]. Now I've said enough, so you tell me what you expect that integral to look like. In particular, how does it depend on the two indices [tex] k [/tex] and [tex] \ell [/tex]?

If this is all gibberish, let me know. We can take a different route.
 
  • #6
Sorry for taking so long for replying, I was at a SPS zone meeting. The only thing that I can see is that we need to integrate the r vector that is parallel to the angular velocity and orthogonal to the B field, but that is obvious. However, there is only one r-hat direction, so will it be that they are both parrallel? Maybe the other method can be of better use in helping me, but I would still love to hear how the mechanism of this way works after I finally think this problem out, with your help of course. Thanks again.
 

1. What is torque on a rotating charge due to a uniform magnetic field?

Torque on a rotating charge due to a uniform magnetic field is the measure of the force that causes a rotating charge to rotate around an axis. It is a product of the magnitude of the magnetic field, the charge, and the distance between the charge and the axis of rotation.

2. How is torque on a rotating charge affected by the strength of the magnetic field?

The torque on a rotating charge is directly proportional to the strength of the magnetic field. This means that an increase in the magnetic field will result in an increase in the torque on the rotating charge.

3. What is the direction of the torque on a rotating charge due to a uniform magnetic field?

The direction of the torque on a rotating charge is perpendicular to both the direction of the magnetic field and the direction of the charge's velocity. This is known as the right-hand rule and can be used to determine the direction of the torque.

4. Can torque on a rotating charge be zero?

Yes, torque on a rotating charge can be zero if the charge is either parallel or antiparallel to the magnetic field. In these cases, the cross product between the charge and the magnetic field will be zero.

5. How is torque on a rotating charge related to angular momentum?

The torque on a rotating charge is directly related to its angular momentum. As the torque increases, so does the angular momentum of the rotating charge. This relationship is known as the rotational analog of Newton's second law and is described by the equation: τ = dL/dt.

Similar threads

  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
319
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
347
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
20
Views
992
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
1K
Back
Top