- #1
Loren Booda
- 3,125
- 4
Provide a personal maxim by which the rest of us may rule our lives.
Live by your wits. If you have none, solicit some maxims.(Just kidding, Loren. Couldn't resist.)Loren Booda said:Provide a personal maxim by which the rest of us may rule our lives.
Everytime you say this I want to ask if you have a brother named Forrest.Math Is Hard said:My mama told me:...
So, it's only important to be nice to non-pigs?Math Is Hard said:My mama told me: It's nice to be important, but it's more important to be nice.
She also said: Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty but the pig enjoys it.
Did she by any chance mention that 'you better shop around'?Math Is Hard said:My mama told me: . . . .
Math Is Hard said:I'm not talking to you people anymore. :grumpy:
0rthodontist said:Be honest first. Second, do what you should. Third, look out for yourself. Fourth, have good intentions.
If your good intentions tell you to be dishonest, or do something contrary to your moral obligation, or put yourself in a very bad position, in most cases you should ignore them. Examples of things that you might do, if you followed your best intentions without regard for honesty, morality, or yourself:JasonRox said:Shouldn't having good intention be the first?
lunarmansion said:Certainly poverty is a source of many evils, one can even say the majority of evils. However, I think the only good thing about having money is that you do not have to worry much about it. That is about all. Whether it can buy happiness depends on the person. Sometimes, I find being around stupid people with too much money can be really suffocating and being around the excessive comforts of too much money can be an upholstered hell. Those of my friends who have made it their goal to make a lot of money and have done so - none of them lead enviable lives. It is an advantage, however, to be brought up being around money, so one develops a bit of a natural contempt for it and can clearly see its limitations. For one never really knows excess in the various things in life unless one has truly experienced them and one cannot understand what moderation is until one has experienced what excess is. I find that many people in the States are so easily impressed by money and this is becoming a world wide phenomenon. You can have no class whatsoever, but if you have a lot of money, I find many people are impressed, not everyone though!
I would aim for a quiet moderate life that gives me plenty of leisure time to enjoy and learn as much as possible the things that are important to me. I find the best and finest pleasures in life are rather inexpensive just as the best foods are usually the simplest.
0rthodontist said:If your good intentions tell you to be dishonest, or do something contrary to your moral obligation, or put yourself in a very bad position, in most cases you should ignore them. Examples of things that you might do, if you followed your best intentions without regard for honesty, morality, or yourself:
--Vigilante justice. Ignore laws and hunt down those who you think did wrong. This leads only to chaos and violence.
--In that same vein, terrorism.
--Lie to your friends to make them happy. The disrespect inherent in dishonesty is worse than any temporary happiness you might give them.
--Stay with an abusive lover to keep him/her happy without regard for your own well being
--Abandon your job or education to help those in need. There can be good reasons for this--you may feel a calling. But if all you have are good intentions, then you should keep your job, since you'd probably be miserable if you quit.
In general, if good intentions override honesty and morality, it leads only to disorder. It is wiser to be honest and moral than to follow your capricious good intentions at every juncture. If people were perfectly wise, good intentions would be all we'd need--but also, if we were so wise, I don't think our actions would often contradict honesty or morality.
Of course, I am not claiming my list is an absolute hierarchy. There are some situations where you might justifiably lie to preserve morality, yourself, or what you think is best. For example you should not tell an assassin the location of your children, though that's not necessarily dishonesty so much as refraining to speak. You might justifiably do something immoral, if there are very, very strong pragmatic reasons. Also "respect for your own well-being" and "good intentions" are more on an even footing--neither clearly outranks the other in my opinion.
I define it as what a person thinks is best at a given time. Wouldn't you agree--for example--that by this definition, terrorists act on their good intentions?JasonRox said:First, you must define good intention.
Gokul43201 said:Maximize life, but don't ever maximize it!
<oops!>