The Americanization of Mental Illness?

  • Medical
  • Thread starter aquitaine
  • Start date
In summary, according to the article, 75% of people who take antidepressants are receiving a placebo.
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #2
Shouldn't it be the Austrian-isation of mental illness?
If everybody still bases everything on a couple of guys from Vienna a century ago.
 
  • #3
Well I don't know, that's why I came here to ask the experts. :p
 
  • #4
Yes, some things are cultural, and culture changes over time.

http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/mentalhealth/chapter2/sec8.html
"Culture also imprints mental health by influencing whether and how individuals experience the discomfort associated with mental illness. When conveyed by tradition and sanctioned by cultural norms, characteristic modes of expressing suffering are sometimes called “idioms of distress” (Lu et al., 1995)."

http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/mentalhealth/chapter4/sec4.html
"For example, among members of some cultural groups, “visions” or “voices” of religious figures are part of normal religious experience. In many communities, “seeing” or being “visited” by a recently deceased person are not unusual among family members. Therefore, labeling an experience as pathological or a psychiatric symptom can be a subtle process for the clinician with a different cultural or ethnic background from the patient; indeed, cultural variations and nuances may occur within the diverse subpopulations of a single racial, ethnic, or cultural group. Often, however, clinicians’ training, skills, and views tend to reflect their own social and cultural influences."
 
  • #5
mgb_phys said:
Shouldn't it be the Austrian-isation of mental illness?
If everybody still bases everything on a couple of guys from Vienna a century ago.

Actually, they don't. Freud and Jung were not psychiatrists, but psychoanalysts, which is a different animal. If you look at the wikipedia article on psychiatry you'll see it preceeded Jung and Freud by a few decades and continued past them, being only slightly influenced by them for a while. Psychoanalysis has pretty much fallen from favor. The closest descendants of the Viennese duo would be the present day psychotherapists.
 
  • #6
http://www.ifc.com/movies/mv002004500000/does-your-soul-have-a-cold.php

Does Your Soul Have A Cold?

IFC Film Synopsis
2006 | Director: Mike Mills | TVMA
Directed by acclaimed independent filmmaker Mike Mills ("Thumbsucker"), "Does Your Soul Have a Cold?" looks at the impact of exporting American definitions of depression and the use of antidepressants to the ancient culture of Japan over the past several years.

In 1999, American pharmaceutical companies, seeking to expand their markets, helped to create a huge ad campaign to educate Japanese about mild depression. The campaign centered on the slogan "Does Your Soul Have a Cold?" Since then, Japanese awareness of depression has rapidly increased along with rising sales of antidepressants.

"Does Your Soul Have a Cold?" is an intimate and compassionate journey into the lives of five depressed Japanese individuals who decide to take antidepressants. Their personal histories are examined, together with their hopes and fears, ultimately offering an intriguing perspective on the broad socio-cultural issues that are only now being uncovered in Japan.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

1. What is "The Americanization of Mental Illness"?

"The Americanization of Mental Illness" refers to the concept that the way mental illnesses are perceived, diagnosed, and treated in the United States has greatly influenced and even shaped the understanding and treatment of mental illnesses in other parts of the world.

2. What are some examples of "The Americanization of Mental Illness"?

Some examples include the widespread use of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) as the standard for diagnosing mental illnesses, the emphasis on individualistic and biomedical approaches to treatment, and the influence of American pharmaceutical companies on the availability and use of psychiatric medications globally.

3. How has "The Americanization of Mental Illness" impacted other cultures?

The impact of "The Americanization of Mental Illness" on other cultures is complex and often controversial. On one hand, it has led to the recognition and treatment of mental illnesses that were previously stigmatized or ignored in some cultures. On the other hand, it has also been criticized for promoting a narrow and Western-centric view of mental health and for disregarding cultural differences and beliefs in the understanding and treatment of mental illnesses.

4. Is the American approach to mental illness treatment superior to other approaches?

There is no clear answer to this question. While the American approach has been successful in many cases, it also has its limitations and has been subject to criticism and controversy. It is important to recognize that different cultures have their own unique ways of addressing mental health issues and that what may work for one culture may not necessarily work for another.

5. How can we address the negative effects of "The Americanization of Mental Illness"?

One way to address the negative effects of "The Americanization of Mental Illness" is to promote cultural competency and diversity in mental health care. This includes training mental health professionals to be aware of and sensitive to cultural differences and to incorporate culturally appropriate approaches into their practice. It is also important to involve individuals from diverse backgrounds in the development and dissemination of mental health information and resources.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
2
Views
855
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
73
Replies
1
Views
790
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
1
Views
4K
Back
Top