| New Reply |
astrophysics on par with physics? (perception-wise) |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Jan2-13, 10:15 AM | #1 |
|
|
astrophysics on par with physics? (perception-wise)
Hi all,
earlier this year I asked about astronomy vs physics, and the general consensus was that, at least in the academic world, astronomy is thought of as fringe in the sense that you won't get hired to a physics post or be able to do physics research, but a physicist could do astronomy. What about an astrophysicist? Is that considered a full blown physicist, like a condensed matter physicist or nuclear physicist? Or is that lumped together with the astronomer in the academic world? thanks |
| PhysOrg.com |
science news on PhysOrg.com >> Hong Kong launches first electric taxis >> Morocco to harness the wind in energy hunt >> Galaxy's Ring of Fire |
| Jan2-13, 11:17 AM | #2 |
|
|
Yes astrophysics is just one specialization among many. An astrophysistist is just as much a physisist as a particle physisist or any other kind.
|
| New Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: astrophysics on par with physics? (perception-wise)
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Is it wise to study both physics and engineering? | Academic Guidance | 1 | ||
| Looking for rural good graduate schools in Physics (Astrophysics, HighEnergy Physics) | Academic Guidance | 1 | ||
| Random variables that are triple-wise independent but quadruple-wise dependent | Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics | 2 | ||
| Relationship help (physics wise that is ;) | Engineering Systems & Design | 3 | ||