Assad's inner circle trying to covertly defect to rebels

  • News
  • Thread starter zoobyshoe
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Circle
In summary: It doesn't seem hypocritical to me at all for the US and others to foment and support rebellion in other nations, and then be outraged when the established government attempts to stamp it out.In summary, the Syrian regime is covertly planning to defect and join the opposition should the Syrian regime become critically threatened by the rebellion. Senior military commanders have outlined “exit strategies” and are making direct contact with rebel forces to ensure that they will be welcomed and not persecuted.
  • #36
chiro said:
Since when is the truth anything but?
...

There is no logical fallacy to truth...
You need to learn how logic works. A fact may or may not be relevant to a line of discussion and ones that are not relevant should be left out.

Regardless, this isn't the place to discuss this. Please read our faq on logic and start a thread if you don't understand something.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #37
Warmongers? People are already dying, are they not? What you really are missing is that what we really want is an end to the bloodshed...

With your superficial information about the subject, apparently you're mislead by your only source of information the least corrupt media.

Do more unbiased research, you get Google!
 
  • #38
dijkarte said:
With your superficial information about the subject, apparently you're mislead by your only source of information the least corrupt media.

Do more unbiased research, you get Google!

What criteria do you use to distinguish biased from unbiased research?
 
  • #39
What criteria do you use to distinguish biased from unbiased research?

Simple. I can ask a question and they either avoid it, or they try justify their answer.
 
  • #40
You ask sources questions -- you are in direct contact with them? Who are your sources? And don't tell me to google myself for your sources. This game is wearing thin. If you have better sources for information, share them, don't just make assertions about them (and ours).
 
  • #41
It's making me bit wary who is supporting terrorism in Syria. Rebels by themselves shouldn't be able to put up so much resistance. I have to wonder why state still hasn't suppressed the rebellion.

As for biased or unbiased information, nothing coming out of Syria is verified. BBC has asserted this countless times that because of journalists restriction in Syria, it is hard to see how true are the claims made by both sides.
 
Last edited:
  • #42
Correct me if I'm wrong but this war has been for long and they are still fighting, no winner. However, the reported killings by the media is from only one side. So the rebels got some kind of very advanced technology that make them fight and stay in the ground without killing. Oh wait, they did some terrorist bombing targeting government, streets and the police. Oh wait, the gov did that? How moronic...
 
  • #43
You are just trolling now: no one has suggested the opposition hasn't killed anyone.

Please respond to my previous question about your sources/information.
 
  • #44
Please respond to my previous question about your sources/information.

It's hard for you to understand if you are not from there. End of story.
 
  • #45
dijkarte said:
It's hard for you to understand if you are not from there. End of story.

I'd categorize that as a very weak argument :rolleyes:.
 
  • #46
dijkarte said:
It's hard for you to understand if you are not from there. End of story.
No, you said you have sources that are available on the internet. Provide them!
 
  • #47
Here are links to mainstream press reports, not at all hard to find, which tend to substantiate significant fractions of what is vouchsafed in those alternative media articles (which were rather sternly demanded from a reluctant dijkarte by his interlocutor).

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-syria-cia-20120725,0,6946873.story

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/25/w...to-syrias-conflict.html?_r=3&src=me&ref=world

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world...ligence-gaps/2012/07/23/gJQAW8DG5W_story.html

Respectfully submitted,
Steve
 
Last edited:
  • #48
The pot is now set to boil: http://www.timesofisrael.com/turkey-mobilizes-tanks-and-missiles-to-border-with-kurdish-syria/
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2012/07/26/157943/assad-hands-control-of-syrias.html

Turkey has just now mobilized tanks, troops and missiles against an unacceptable breakaway Kurdish region that has declared autonomy from Damascus. International war to follow?

Meanwhile, Alawites are retreating to Latakia. It seems soon the bulk of Syria will be in the hands of the Sunni majority, and the minority Druze, Kurds, Christians, Shia, not to mention drinkers, shavers, and Western dressed and coiffed women will be fending for themselves. Muslim versus Muslim, Arab versus Arab. This is excellent divide and conquer strategy, something Sun Tzu or Niccolo Machiavelli would be proud of.

Democracy has it's rightful and hard-won place in the modern world, but it has always been susceptible to the tyranny of the majority.

Respectfully submitted,
Steve
 
Last edited:
  • #49
In recent news Annan resigned:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-19099676

Security council members are still pointing fingers and blaming each other:
Writing on Twitter, the US ambassador to the UN, Susan Rice, thanked Mr Annan for his "dedication, service and determined efforts", but said those who had blocked UN resolutions had "made his mission impossible".
 
  • #50
Dotini said:
The pot is now set to boil: http://www.timesofisrael.com/turkey-mobilizes-tanks-and-missiles-to-border-with-kurdish-syria/
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2012/07/26/157943/assad-hands-control-of-syrias.html

Turkey has just now mobilized tanks, troops and missiles against an unacceptable breakaway Kurdish region that has declared autonomy from Damascus. International war to follow?

Meanwhile, Alawites are retreating to Latakia. It seems soon the bulk of Syria will be in the hands of the Sunni majority, and the minority Druze, Kurds, Christians, Shia, not to mention drinkers, shavers, and Western dressed and coiffed women will be fending for themselves. Muslim versus Muslim, Arab versus Arab. This is excellent divide and conquer strategy, something Sun Tzu or Niccolo Machiavelli would be proud of.

Democracy has it's rightful and hard-won place in the modern world, but it has always been susceptible to the tyranny of the majority.

Respectfully submitted,
Steve
If I were Syrian, as a non-Sunni, I would have preferred to live under Assad. I fear regime change will put Syria decades back. But only had Assad known that reforms are must:
http://meria.idc.ac.il/journal/2007/issue2/Raphaeli.pdf (20007)

Even if you read any article on Libya,Tunisia, or Egypt economic/social reforms, you would see exactly the same problem. These problems were known for more than a decade but why the Western nations also ignored them? Democracy isn't the correct solution in the short run, it will only over-complicate and delay the the economic/social reforms that these countries need IMO.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #52
rootX said:
If I were Syrian, as a non-Sunni, I would have preferred to live under Assad. I fear regime change will put Syria decades back. But only had Assad known that reforms are must:
http://meria.idc.ac.il/journal/2007/issue2/Raphaeli.pdf (20007)

Even if you read any article on Libya,Tunisia, or Egypt economic/social reforms, you would see exactly the same problem. These problems were known for more than a decade but why the Western nations also ignored them? Democracy isn't the correct solution in the short run, it will only over-complicate and delay the the economic/social reforms that these countries need IMO.
Some folks don't like living under an oligarchy or autocratic regime, especially those in the disadvantaged majority.

It's not clear that economic/social reforms will occur anytime soon under regimes like those of Assad or Mubarak.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #53
Astronuc said:
Some folks don't like living under an oligarchy or autocratic regime, especially those in the disadvantaged majority.

It's not clear that economic/social reforms will occur anytime soon under regimes like those of Assad or Mubarak.
Neither it's clear when the new governments will have sufficient powers to carry out the much needed reforms that led to the riots and if they will still be willing to carry the country ahead not backwards.
 

Similar threads

News WMD-Tehran times and a li'l perspective
    • General Discussion
Replies
2
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top