Kramers-Kronig: Solving for Dielectric Permeability E'(w)

  • Thread starter Spy2008
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Formula
In summary, the conversation was about the formula Kramers-Kronig 82,9 Landau-Lifgarbages page 390 volume 8 for dielectric permeability which includes a pole in zero in a conductor represented by 2 composed 4*pisigma/W (omega). The question was about the first part of imaginary dielectric permeability E’’(w)=-1/pi*∱E’(w’)/(w’-w) dw’ where E-dielectric permeability should remain constant, but in the formula it was gone-1. The teacher asked for proof of its influence and possible explanations for its behavior at different frequencies. The conversation also mentioned using different materials to support the argument.
  • #1
Spy2008
1
0
In formula Kramers-Kronig 82,9 Landau - Lifgarbages page 390 volume 8 for dielectric permeability have added 2 composed 4*pisigma/W (omega) which is responsible for a pole in zero in a conductor. A question: the First part of imaginary dielectric permeability E’’(w)=-1/pi*∱E’(w’)/(w’-w) dw’ where E-dielectric permeability should remain constant, but in it was gone-1 why, and hardly above in the formula 82,7 for dielectric was not gone-1?
The question of the teacher in that that it was not necessary but if who can prove that it influences something or something depends on it will be plus:). Using any materials. Here were, what variants:
" On the mathematician the conclusion assumes to neglect integral on infinite to a floor of a circle for what from function subtract its value on infinity, and it just (see at the same LL) 1. " On other that due to-1 integral to converge better and it is not necessary to look what frequency, here, if it is possible to become more in detail at which frequencies noticeably participation-1
If it is possible write the variants as can influence-1 physically, mathematical, for example if all таки with-1 to converge better that it is possible to paint if not difficultly or to give the reference to the literature where is painted, simply the teacher should to something be shown, that-1 is though any sense, instead of in words. In advance ALL THANKS.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Just so you know, your post here is very difficult to understand. I'm guessing that you used a translator of some kind, which means that you may use the same one reading the responses on here. That will make it very tough to communicate effectively on both sides.

Zz.
 
  • #3


The Kramers-Kronig relations are a powerful tool in understanding the relationship between the real and imaginary parts of a complex function. In the case of dielectric permeability, the Kramers-Kronig relations allow us to relate the real part of the dielectric permeability (E') to its imaginary part (E'') through integrals.

In the formula given, the term 4*pisigma/W (omega) is added to account for the presence of a pole at zero frequency in conductors. This is important because it allows us to accurately describe the behavior of materials at low frequencies, where the dielectric permeability is typically complex.

Now, let's address the question about the first part of the imaginary dielectric permeability, E''(w). In the formula, we see that it is given by the integral of E'(w')/(w'-w) dw' over all frequencies. The teacher's question is why this integral evaluates to -1/pi when it should remain constant.

The answer lies in the nature of the integral. When we integrate over all frequencies, we are essentially summing up the contributions of all frequencies to the imaginary part of the dielectric permeability. In this case, we are subtracting the value of E'(w') at infinity, which is assumed to be zero. This is because in the limit of high frequencies, the dielectric permeability tends to zero.

So, why is -1/pi the value that this integral evaluates to? This is due to the mathematical properties of the function being integrated. As the teacher suggested, the integral converges better when we subtract its value at infinity. This means that the value of the integral is more accurate and less dependent on the specific frequency range being considered. In this case, the value of -1/pi is a result of the mathematical properties of the function being integrated.

As for the physical implications of this result, it is difficult to say without more context. However, the fact that the integral evaluates to a constant value regardless of frequency suggests that the behavior of the material at low frequencies is not significantly affected by the presence of the pole at zero frequency. This could be further explored through experimentation or by consulting relevant literature.

In summary, the value of -1/pi in the Kramers-Kronig relations for dielectric permeability is a result of the mathematical properties of the function being integrated. It is important in accurately describing the behavior of materials at low frequencies and
 

1. What is Kramers-Kronig?

Kramers-Kronig is a mathematical relationship that connects the real and imaginary parts of a complex function. It is commonly used in physics to relate the absorption and dispersion properties of a material.

2. What is the significance of using Kramers-Kronig to solve for dielectric permeability E'(w)?

The use of Kramers-Kronig in solving for dielectric permeability allows for a more accurate and complete understanding of a material's dielectric properties, as it takes into account both the real and imaginary components of the permittivity.

3. How does Kramers-Kronig work?

Kramers-Kronig works by using Cauchy's residue theorem to relate the real and imaginary parts of a complex function through integration. This allows for the determination of one component if the other is known.

4. What is the practical application of Kramers-Kronig in science and engineering?

Kramers-Kronig has many practical applications in science and engineering, particularly in the study of materials. It can be used to analyze the dielectric properties of materials, which is important in fields such as telecommunications, electronics, and optics.

5. Are there any limitations to using Kramers-Kronig for solving for dielectric permeability E'(w)?

Like any mathematical model, there are limitations to using Kramers-Kronig. It assumes that the material being studied is linear and isotropic, which may not always be the case. Additionally, it is only applicable for materials with a causal response, meaning the response depends only on the present and past values of the input.

Similar threads

  • Differential Equations
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top