- #1
phoenixthoth
- 1,605
- 2
the title says it all.
discuss.
discuss.
Does QM prohibit a Omniscient Being?
loseyourname said:The logical impossibility of omnipotence prohibits the existence of an omnipotent being.
A simple paradox: We have one omnipotent being. He's bored, and since he is omnipotent, he decides to use his powers to create another omnipotent being. They're getting along perfectly well until they see a hamburger they both want. Only one can have it, so the loser wasn't really omnipotent. If it was the first omnipotent being, he was never omnipotent to begin with. If it was the second, not only was he not omnipotent, but the first being was not omnipotent either, as he tried to create another omnipotent being and failed.
phoenixthoth said:the title says it all.
discuss.
phoenixthoth said:the title says it all.
discuss.
yesicanread said:Is your idea a entire forluma, in the design of the order of operations ?
loseyourname said:The logical impossibility of omnipotence prohibits the existence of an omnipotent being.
A simple paradox: We have one omnipotent being. He's bored, and since he is omnipotent, he decides to use his powers to create another omnipotent being. They're getting along perfectly well until they see a hamburger they both want. Only one can have it, so the loser wasn't really omnipotent. If it was the first omnipotent being, he was never omnipotent to begin with. If it was the second, not only was he not omnipotent, but the first being was not omnipotent either, as he tried to create another omnipotent being and failed.
Imparcticle said:Why couldn't they share the hamburger?
No, the theory of Quantum Mechanics does not directly address the existence of an omniscient being. It is a scientific theory that explains the behavior of particles at a subatomic level, and does not make any claims about the existence or non-existence of a higher being.
It is not possible for an omniscient being to violate the principles of Quantum Mechanics, as these principles are fundamental laws of nature that govern the behavior of particles. If an omniscient being exists, it would have knowledge and understanding of these laws and would not be able to break them.
No, an omniscient being would not be able to control the outcomes of quantum experiments. The outcomes of these experiments are determined by the probabilities described by Quantum Mechanics, and an omniscient being would not be able to alter these probabilities.
No, the principle of uncertainty in Quantum Mechanics states that it is impossible to know the exact position and momentum of a particle at the same time. This does not necessarily conflict with the idea of an omniscient being, as it is possible that this being would have knowledge of both the position and momentum of a particle without directly observing it.
It is not possible for us to know the capabilities of an omniscient being, but it is reasonable to assume that if such a being exists, it would have complete understanding and knowledge of all physical phenomena, including quantum entanglement. However, the concept of quantum entanglement is still not fully understood by scientists, so it is impossible to say for certain whether an omniscient being could truly comprehend it.