| New Reply |
Euler-Lagrange Equations with constraint depend on 2nd derivative? |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Nov4-12, 09:38 AM | #1 |
|
|
Euler-Lagrange Equations with constraint depend on 2nd derivative?
I am reading the book of Neuenschwander about Noether's Theorem. He explains the Euler-Lagrange equations by starting with
[tex]J=\int_a^b L(t,x^\mu,\dot x^\mu) dt[/tex] From this he derives the Euler-Lagrange equations [tex]\frac{\partial L}{\partial x^\mu} = \frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot x^\mu}[/tex] which is all well comprehensible. Then he describes how to introduce constraints of the form [itex]h(t,x^\mu)=0[/itex] to form a lagrangian with constraint [itex]L_c = L+\lambda h[/itex]. My question: The constraint does not depend on [itex]\dot x^\mu[/itex]. Is this just to simplify the derivation in this case or would a constraint [tex]h(t,\dot x^\mu)=0[/tex] invalidate the Euler-Lagrange equations? If the latter is true, how would we introduce constraints on the [itex]\dot x^\mu[/itex]? |
| Nov4-12, 10:44 AM | #2 |
|
Recognitions:
|
This is called a holonomic constraint (but it's rheonomic because it's explicitly time dependent). A constraint is anholonomic if it's a non-integrable equation of both the generalized coordinates and velocities.
|
| New Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Euler-Lagrange Equations with constraint depend on 2nd derivative?
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Euler-Lagrange equations | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 3 | ||
| Euler-Lagrange Equations | Advanced Physics Homework | 3 | ||
| Euler-Lagrange 2nd derivative | Advanced Physics Homework | 2 | ||
| Euler-Lagrange equations in QFT?? | Quantum Physics | 11 | ||
| Euler-Lagrange equations in QFT?? | General Physics | 2 | ||