About the principle of relativity

In summary: All right.I still can't persuade myself.But thank you all the same.Please give me a minute. Let me think about it .Let's suppose that u sees u' moving east at, say, 10 m/s. If they are next to one another at t= 0 then u will see u' move 100 m in 10 seconds. From u' point of view, u is moving west but he...
  • #1
ENDLESSYOU
29
0
When we dealing with questions like "S'-frame moves with respect to S-frame at a velocity u in x direction" then we also assume that "S-frame also moves with respect to S'-frame at a velocity -u in x direction"
Why this assumption is correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Welcome to PF!

Hi ENDLESSYOU! Welcome to PF! :smile:

We have to assume that the observers in S and S' are using units (of distance and time) which make their speeds equal …

if S was using metres, and S' was using feet, it wouldn't work! :wink:

(btw, this has nothing to do with einstein, it works for galileo also)
 
  • #3
ENDLESSYOU said:
When we dealing with questions like "S'-frame moves with respect to S-frame at a velocity u in x direction" then we also assume that "S-frame also moves with respect to S'-frame at a velocity -u in x direction"
Why this assumption is correct?
I think you are asking why the velocity changes sign, correct? Well, isn't it obvious if there is a relative speed between us and I see you moving east with respect to me, then you will see me moving west with respect to you? It really doesn't matter which one or both of us is actually moving, we're talking about relative speed. Doesn't this make sense to you?
 
  • #4


tiny-tim said:
Hi ENDLESSYOU! Welcome to PF! :smile:

We have to assume that the observers in S and S' are using units (of distance and time) which make their speeds equal …

if S was using metres, and S' was using feet, it wouldn't work! :wink:

(btw, this has nothing to do with einstein, it works for galileo also)

Thank you! But what I really mean is that if they are using the same units ,then why u+u'=0?
Because of symmetry?
 
  • #5
ghwellsjr said:
I think you are asking why the velocity changes sign, correct? Well, isn't it obvious if there is a relative speed between us and I see you moving east with respect to me, then you will see me moving west with respect to you? It really doesn't matter which one or both of us is actually moving, we're talking about relative speed. Doesn't this make sense to you?

Thank you but I'm sorry my presentation is so poor.My question is why |u|=|u'|? Though it's obvious..
 
  • #6
ENDLESSYOU said:
… if they are using the same units ,then why u+u'=0?

Because they are also using lined-up direction-names. :smile:

S's North is S''s North.

If S's North was S''s South, then u' would be u, not -u ! :wink:
 
  • #7
tiny-tim said:
Because they are also using lined-up direction-names. :smile:

S's North is S''s North.

If S's North was S''s South, then u' would be u, not -u ! :wink:

:cry:My confusion is not the direction but the magnitude of them. Why |u|=|-u|?
 
  • #8
ENDLESSYOU said:
:cry:My confusion is not the direction but the magnitude of them. Why |u|=|-u|?
Are you wondering why the magnitudes of the speeds are the same when one (or both) of them is experiencing time dilation and length contraction?
 
  • #9
ghwellsjr said:
Are you wondering why the magnitudes of the speeds are the same when one (or both) of them is experiencing time dilation and length contraction?

No.It's about two frames ,not two particles in two frames.So even in the sense of Galileo,the question still exits.
 
  • #10
ENDLESSYOU said:
:cry:My confusion is not the direction but the magnitude of them. Why |u|=|-u|?

:confused: I thought you were happy with my previous answer …
tiny-tim said:
We have to assume that the observers in S and S' are using units (of distance and time) which make their speeds equal …

if S was using metres, and S' was using feet, it wouldn't work! :wink:

(btw, this has nothing to do with einstein, it works for galileo also)
 
  • #11
ENDLESSYOU said:
No.It's about two frames ,not two particles in two frames.So even in the sense of Galileo,the question still exits.
Would a good answer for you be that when you take any event in any frame and transform it to any other frame moving at u with respect to the first frame and then you transform again from that second frame with -u, you get the same event you started with in the first frame?
 
  • #12
tiny-tim said:
:confused: I thought you were happy with my previous answer …

All right.I still can't persuade myself.But thank you all the same.Please give me a minute. Let me think about it .
 
  • #13
Let's suppose that u sees u' moving east at, say, 10 m/s. If they are next to one another at t= 0 then u will see u' move 100 m in 10 seconds. From u' point of view, u is moving west but he will still measure 100 m between them after 10 seconds. That's why u' sees u moving at 10m/s also but in the opposite direction: [itex]v_u= -v_{u'}[/itex]
 
  • #14
HallsofIvy said:
Let's suppose that u sees u' moving east at, say, 10 m/s. If they are next to one another at t= 0 then u will see u' move 100 m in 10 seconds. From u' point of view, u is moving west but he will still measure 100 m between them after 10 seconds. That's why u' sees u moving at 10m/s also but in the opposite direction: [itex]v_u= -v_{u'}[/itex]

Thank you! But what you explain isn't the point I'm confused.Let me think..
 
  • #15
ghwellsjr said:
Would a good answer for you be that when you take any event in any frame and transform it to any other frame moving at u with respect to the first frame and then you transform again from that second frame with -u, you get the same event you started with in the first frame?

I think what you say is something like symmetry.Let me think.
 
  • #16
ENDLESSYOU said:
When we dealing with questions like "S'-frame moves with respect to S-frame at a velocity u in x direction" then we also assume that "S-frame also moves with respect to S'-frame at a velocity -u in x direction"
Why this assumption is correct?

This is not the only relative geometric orientation of the S and S' frames of reference that can be used (obviously), although it does greatly simplify the mathematical form of the Lorentz Transformation. This particular relative orientation is sometimes referred to as Standard Configuration.
The relative velocity of the S' frame of reference with respect to the S frame of reference can generally be in any spatial direction (as reckoned from the S frame of reference), and the relative velocity of the S frame of reference with respect to the S ' frame of reference can be generally in any spatial direction (as reckoned from the S' frame of reference). The only constraint is that the magnitudes of these 3d velocity vectors must be equal to one another.
Incidentally, there is a slight error in your description. You should replace the words "at a velocity -u in x direction" with the words "at a velocity -u in x' direction". The x and x' axes are not pointing in the same directions in 4D spacetime, even for Standard Configuration. Each has a component in the time direction of the other's frame of reference.

Chet
 

What is the principle of relativity?

The principle of relativity states that the laws of physics are the same for all observers in uniform motion, regardless of their relative velocity.

Who discovered the principle of relativity?

The principle of relativity was first introduced by Albert Einstein in his theory of special relativity in 1905.

What is the difference between special and general relativity?

Special relativity deals with the laws of physics in inertial reference frames, while general relativity includes the effects of gravity and non-inertial reference frames.

What is the significance of the principle of relativity in modern physics?

The principle of relativity is a fundamental concept in modern physics and has led to many important theories and discoveries, such as the theory of general relativity and the concept of spacetime.

Are there any practical applications of the principle of relativity?

Yes, the principle of relativity has practical applications in various fields such as GPS technology, which relies on the precise measurements of time and space according to the principles of relativity.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
20
Views
747
  • Special and General Relativity
5
Replies
144
Views
6K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
939
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
21
Views
919
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
811
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
84
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
6
Views
997
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
57
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
756
Back
Top