Is inequality bad for society as a whole?

  • News
  • Thread starter P-Jay1
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Inequality
In summary: Equality is not the same as sameness. Equality refers to a situation where everyone has the same opportunities, but sameness refers to the idea that everyone is the same. Equality is a utopian ideal, and is not something that exists in reality. Inequality is natural, and refers to the difference in wealth and power that exists in society. It has been said that a country with a bigger gap between the rich and poor is a country with... problems.
  • #36


nismaratwork said:
btw, that was a terrific documentary... NatGeo can be hit or miss, but when they hit, boy do they hit.

"Guns, Germs, and Steel' was actually a book that came out a while ago: https://www.amazon.com/dp/0393317552/?tag=pfamazon01-20
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #37


nismaratwork said:
Russ: Star Wars? (THE NEW ONES), and unless you're a fan of Baudelaire, 'The Usual Suspects'? If the latter, the only thing that really merits a response would be to correct you:

You quoted the form of Baudelaire, "Mes chers frères, n'oubliez jamais, quand vous entendrez vanter le progrès des lumières, que la plus belle des ruses du diable est de vous persuader qu'il n'existe pas!"

but with a bastardized content of the Hungarian adaptation of the phrase used in TUS: "Az Ördög legnagyobb ámítása, hogy meggyozte a világot, nem létezik." (which is closest to: "The Ördög (demonic creature) pulled (vernacular) the greatest deception convincing the world it doesn't it exist."

You like movies right?... so now, context! :smile:

I am confused here, which part of Russ's post was he making a quote...?
 
  • #38


DanP said:
To rant myself, I don't believe that fighting to the pathetic attachment of conservative right to church and religion and all the impingement this cause on rights of other humans, has anything to do with Marxism. This relentless tendency of religious conservatives is a threat to this world as big as Marxism is.

Technically, Marxism is a religion. It is just an atheist religion. As opposed to a glorious paradise you experience in an afterlife with a god, Marxism promises this glorious paradise on Earth. The State is the god in Marxism.

Goldwater had a point...

I would say Goldwater lacked understanding of much of the pro-life point-of-view (IMO both the pro-life and pro-choice sides make good points, and the extremists on both sides are religious in their points of view).
 
  • #39


CAC1001 said:
"Guns, Germs, and Steel' was actually a book that came out a while ago: https://www.amazon.com/dp/0393317552/?tag=pfamazon01-20

Yeah, that was a good examination... I read it, then listened to it on an audio book format on a drive. Thoughtful... I didn't realize it was one and the same, thanks!

CAC1001: "The devil's greatest trick is convincing the world he doesn't exist." and, arguably the fish quote (I'm not sure about that one). As I said, either he's a fan of the French poet Baudelaire, who's quote isn't a good match, or 'The Usual Suspects'... which is.

As for Marxism, and atheism (in the form of "I'm SURE" as opposed to, "I have no belief"), yeah... good point. Abortion... that's just a thread-locker, no touchie! :wink:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #40


P-Jay1 said:
In terms of inequality of society there are now claims that an unequal society creates health problems and social problems for every class, including the rich. It has been said that a country with a bigger gap between the rich and poor is a country with bigger health and social problems.

For instance countries like the USA and the Uk do worse than there equaivalents in more equal countries like Sweden or Japan. Unequal countries like the USA have a lot higher homicides per 100,000 than say Sweden. Unequal countries have higher teen birth rates, more violence, more obesity, more people in prison, and lower levels of child welfare.
Yes countries like Japan, birthrate 1.34, are so content with their equality that they are happily on trend to disappear in a couple generations.
http://www.google.com/publicdata/ex...ry:DEU:ITA:JPN:HUN:PRT:ROM:POL&hl=en&dl=en_US
 
  • #41


mheslep said:
Yes countries like Japan, birthrate 1.34, are so content with their equality that they are happily on trend to disappear in a couple generations.
http://www.google.com/publicdata/ex...ry:DEU:ITA:JPN:HUN:PRT:ROM:POL&hl=en&dl=en_US

That is the current trend, no doubt.

My question then is, do you believe that trend will continue until they "happily disappear"? If so... what culture has done this... ever?
 
  • #43
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #44


nismaratwork said:
That is a GROTESQUE oversimplification of hundreds of years of what amounted to regional warfare and attrition. I'm sorry, I realize that there are cultural elements that resemble your point, but they're out of any kind of context.
Stop for a moment, slow down. You missed the point. I gave you an example of a society from the ancient world. Every society in the ancient world had regional warfare, but not everyone declined and disappeared as did Sparta. We know that in part the insular behavior of the Spartans led to its own demise, via resistance to change and a notoriously exclusive warrior class. There are some parallels to some of today's societies, not an exact match. If you're not interested exploring the parallels, fine, move on. And please don't say you're 'sorry' when you mean something else entirely.
 
  • #45


mheslep said:
Stop for a moment, slow down. You missed the point. I gave you an example of a society from the ancient world. Every society in the ancient world had regional warfare, but not everyone declined and disappeared as did Sparta. We know that in part the insular behavior of the Spartans led to its own demise, via resistance to change and a notoriously exclusive warrior class. There are some parallels to some of today's societies, not an exact match. If you're not interested exploring the parallels, fine, move on. And please don't say you're 'sorry' when you mean something else entirely.

I think there's a bit of a difference between an ancient group of what we'd probably call warrior-priests... and a HUGELY populous modern nation. Yes, the Japanese could once have fallen into that category, but that was over as of the Meiji Revolution. I'm not sure what there is to discuss when the best parallels to be drawn is with one of the most singularly militant nation-states that has ever existed, if not the most.
 
  • #46


I believe he was drawing our attention to the similarities, not the differences.
 
  • #47


Jimmy Snyder said:
I believe he was drawing our attention to the similarities, not the differences.

Yes, but they're superficial in my view if you don't take them in context. When taken in context they're no longer similar.
 
  • #48


DanP said:
It depends what your understanding of liberalism is. Frankly, I don't believe that sharing a belief that humans should enjoy the same set of rights guaranteed by the state , and being equals before the law it's such a bad idea.
Yes, but that's classical liberalism. I think it's a shame that the word "liberalism" is used in the U.S. today to refer to economic authoritarianism.

It's been pointed out in this forum that the word "liberal" is not used that way in Europe, a European "liberal" is what we Americans call "right wing" on economic issues. How in the world did it get so twisted here in the U.S.?
 
  • #49


nismaratwork said:
My question then is, do you believe that trend will continue until they "happily disappear"? If so... what culture has done this... ever?
Another superficial example is the Shaker community. They haven't completely happily disappeared yet, but this ultimate joy seems not far away. As a part of their practice, they don't have children. They were able to maintain their numbers by adopting orphans but the practice was made illegal for them and that tied their tubes so to speak.
 
  • #50


Jimmy Snyder said:
Another superficial example is the Shaker community. They haven't completely happily disappeared yet, but this ultimate joy seems not far away. As a part of their practice, they don't have children. They were able to maintain their numbers by adopting orphans but the practice was made illegal for them and that tied their tubes so to speak.

Well I'll be... Yeah, that fits as well as ANYTHING could! I remember the name, but I didn't realize they were so... interesting. It's not a country, but it's pretty modern, and the result is clear as you say.

mheslep: It wasn't your example, but this still makes your point, if on a small community scale... it could be scaled up.


Are there any books specifically about cultures with these odd kinds of... I don't know what to call it except a generational-cultural suicide pact?
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
  • General Math
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
5
Replies
144
Views
19K
  • General Math
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
35
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
6
Views
854
Replies
2
Views
91
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
556
  • General Math
Replies
12
Views
1K
Back
Top