Finance: Why bother regulating financial institutions?

  • Thread starter Nikitin
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Finance
In summary: The goal is to maximize the value of the assets, not to punish the creditors. So, basically, the EU is trying to regulate the financial sector in order to protect the economy, but it may not be a good thing because it will hurt the people who are responsible for generating money in the first place, like speculators. There is also a risk that the financial sector will move away from the UK if the regulations are too harsh.
  • #1
Nikitin
735
27
What's the point? Recently the EU tried to regulate various kinds of speculations by taxing - but the most damaging speculations like CDS, currency futures etc can be done as easily in New York as in Paris.

So why would the EU bother doing this without international support from major economies like the US?`

I've only got a casual interest in finance, so please explain to me in a layman's terms.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It can only be done over seas if they move the money to an overseas institution such as a subsidiary. If the rules also penalize repurchase agreements (and other ways of moving money out of the country) and have adequate rules for properly valuing foreign assets on their balance sheets then much of this concern can be mitigated. As a side note, in some areas, London had less strict regulations then in New York.
 
  • #3
Well, then Wall street would take over the markets while the Euro financial companies die. Hardly beneficiary to the EU anyway, right?
 
  • #4
Nikitin said:
Well, then Wall street would take over the markets while the Euro financial companies die. Hardly beneficiary to the EU anyway, right?
It is my (admittedly limited) understanding that this is why Prime Minister Cameron refused to sign up the UK to the new reforms. Reason being that a hefty portion of the UK's economy is generated by The City and if regulations such as a transaction tax were imposed the money generating industry would migrate.
 
  • #5
Indeed, it was quite selfish of Cameron to refuse to cooperate. I mean, the ones who would be hurt by the taxes would mostly be speculators, not real investors and banks lending money away. They aren't good for the UKs economy in the long term.

Anyway are there any financial experts here who might answer my question in the OP?

Maybe the EU was planning on a cooperation with the other major economies, like the US, when it came to regulating the financial sector?
 
  • #6
I believe the US should have natioalized the banks during the financial crisis and then just sold the companies later when they could get an OK price. That's the only way the stockholders will be on the watch for insane specualtions. The employee with stock options will also behave bether.
 
  • #7
The bankruptcy system works just fine. There's no need to alter it.

In bankruptcy the federal government becomes trustee to the assets of the bankrupt firm.
 

1. Why is it important to regulate financial institutions?

Regulating financial institutions is important for several reasons. First, it helps to protect consumers and investors from fraud and unethical practices. Additionally, it helps to maintain stability in the financial system by preventing risky and irresponsible behavior by financial institutions. It also ensures fair competition and promotes transparency in the financial sector.

2. What are some examples of financial institutions?

Financial institutions include banks, credit unions, insurance companies, investment firms, and brokerage firms. These institutions provide a wide range of financial services such as lending, investing, and insurance to individuals and businesses.

3. How are financial institutions regulated?

Financial institutions are regulated by government agencies such as the Federal Reserve, the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. These agencies have the authority to set and enforce rules and regulations for financial institutions to ensure they operate in a safe and sound manner.

4. What happens if financial institutions are not regulated?

If financial institutions are not regulated, there is a higher risk of fraud, financial crises, and economic instability. Without regulations, financial institutions may engage in risky and unethical practices, which can harm consumers and investors. This can also lead to a lack of trust in the financial system, causing economic downturns.

5. Is regulation of financial institutions necessary in a free market economy?

Yes, regulation of financial institutions is necessary in a free market economy. While free market principles promote competition and innovation, they also allow for potential abuses and market failures. Regulation helps to mitigate these risks and promote a fair and efficient financial system for all participants.

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • STEM Career Guidance
2
Replies
69
Views
30K
  • General Discussion
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
7
Views
6K
Replies
123
Views
14K
  • General Discussion
Replies
28
Views
10K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
Back
Top