Reversible & non reversible internal combustion engines

In summary, there are two types of reversible engines - one that can function in both directions of rotation in the real world, and one that is an ideal process in thermodynamics. The former is more common in two stroke engines, while the latter is mostly seen in four stroke engines with modifications to the valvetrain. However, it is not a common practice as it requires significant modifications and is not very efficient. Some have also experimented with using a reversed-grind cam and a flipped transmission to make a four stroke engine run backwards.
  • #1
boyce59
2
0
Please can someone explain clearly in perhaps lay man terms the difference between REVERSIBLE & NON REVERSIBLE INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES. Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
It depends on whether you are talking about a reversible thermodynamic process or a real world engine.

If you are talking about something that could actually exist (my assumption of your question) then a reversible engine is one that will operate in either direction of rotation. It is more common for 2 stroke engines since no real valvetrain modification is necessary (when only done for short periods). In this case, only the starter mechanism must be reversed.

I've heard that reversible 4 stroke engines exist, but these would have to have valvetrains that are actuated by some other method than simply being driven mechanically off of the crankshaft. Typically 4 stroke engines are only able to function in one direction of rotation because the valvetrain is mechanically linked to the crankshaft rotation. This means that if you spin the crankshaft backwards, you will reverse the action of the intake and exhaust valves. The entire intake and exhaust systems are designed to function in one direction. Reversing that would be poorly efficient at best and most likely render the engine inoperable.

Basic answer- In the real world a reversible engine is one that can function in both directions of rotation. A nonreversible can only operate in one direction of rotation.

If you were asking about a reversible thermodynamic process, then that is another discussion, the simple answer being one is an ideal process and the other is what actually exists in the real world.
 
  • #3
There are no reversible internal combustion engines! To prove this, try turning the crankshaft and wait for the exhaust gases to get sucked in and become fine fuel droplets mixed with air agian.
 
  • #4
Dickfore said:
There are no reversible internal combustion engines! To prove this, try turning the crankshaft and wait for the exhaust gases to get sucked in and become fine fuel droplets mixed with air agian.

Certainly not true of two strokes.

As for four strokes, although mostly a good point, this could be remedied by direct injection or valvetrain actuation that is not mechanically linked to the crankshaft.

To concede, I have never seen any evidence of a reversible four stroke. All I have seen/heard are vauge rumors.
 
  • #5
S_Happens said:
Certainly not true of two strokes.

As for four strokes, although mostly a good point, this could be remedied by direct injection or valvetrain actuation that is not mechanically linked to the crankshaft.

To concede, I have never seen any evidence of a reversible four stroke. All I have seen/heard are vauge rumors.

What the hell are you talking about? The very process of combustion is irreversible. You cannot create fuel - air mixtures by compressing smoke.
 
  • #6
Nothing in my posts is strictly prohibitive of combustion. In fact I explicitly state what would have to be done in order to reverse the rotation of a 4 stroke and still achieve combustion (nothing specific prohibits reverse operation in a 2 stroke for short duractions). I never even come close to pretending to combust spent air/fuel.

To be blunt, why do you think that if valvetrain actuation is independant of crankshaft rotation you would be "compressing smoke"? I think you are confusing reversing the rotation of the crankshaft/rotating assembly with completely reversing the fuel/air/exhaust flow through the entire engine.

You seem to ignore 2 stroke engines. There are many cases of 2 stroke engines being reversed (almost exclusively in very short durations). In most cases this is used in lieu of a reverse gear.
 
  • #7
For clarity, I think the crux of the problem is that your example is to take a conventional four stroke engine and try to run it backwards without any modification. I am talking about what it would take to reverse the crankshaft rotation in a four stroke engine and still achieve combustion. The valvetrain actuation would have to be reversed as well (meaning it would need to function in the same order it did before reversing crankshaft rotation), which I have mentioned in every post of mine so far. This is exactly what the rumored engines do.
 
  • #8
Why don't you use a gearbox like any normal person would do then? Also, this is not what I meant by reversible heat engine.
 
  • #9
I appreciate the responses.
 
  • #10
Dickfore said:
Why don't you use a gearbox like any normal person would do then? Also, this is not what I meant by reversible heat engine.

When you only need to run at a set speed in either direction a reversible two stroke is more suited to the task as you don't have the losses associated with a transmission.

S_Happens also made the clear distinction that he was not talking about thermodynamically reversible systems.
 
  • #11
First time I saw a two stroke run backwards was when my buddy momentarily popped the clutch on his dirt bike, while rolling it (backwards) down the ramp off his pickup... I will never forget the look on his face when he then revved the motor and let the clutch out ...

Though I suspect the OP here is talking about reversible in the thermo sense
 
  • #12
I'm not sure what the official engineering take on this is, but I can say from experience that you can make a 4-stroke run backwards by using a reversed-grind cam and bass-ackwards starter. (It might be a tad more complicated now; that was when the distributor was driven from the camshaft.) You would then, of course, have to also build a custom bell-housing so you could flip your tranny upside-down. Elsewise, you would have 4 reverse gears and one forward.
 
  • #13
Danger said:
I'm not sure what the official engineering take on this is, but I can say from experience that you can make a 4-stroke run backwards by using a reversed-grind cam and bass-ackwards starter. (It might be a tad more complicated now; that was when the distributor was driven from the camshaft.) You would then, of course, have to also build a custom bell-housing so you could flip your tranny upside-down. Elsewise, you would have 4 reverse gears and one forward.

That would do the trick, a mirrored cam was what I used to get a straight 4 to run backwards as one bank of a V8. Spark timing is the easy bit.
 

1. What is the difference between a reversible and non-reversible internal combustion engine?

A reversible internal combustion engine is one that can operate in both forward and reverse directions, allowing it to perform both work and heat transfer. A non-reversible internal combustion engine, on the other hand, can only operate in one direction and is typically used for work production only.

2. How do reversible and non-reversible internal combustion engines work?

Both types of engines use the same basic principles of converting fuel into energy through combustion. However, a reversible engine has additional components, such as valves and ports, that allow it to change the direction of its operations.

3. What are some common applications of reversible and non-reversible internal combustion engines?

Reversible internal combustion engines are commonly used in machines that require both forward and reverse movement, such as boats and locomotives. Non-reversible engines are typically used in vehicles and machinery that only require forward motion, such as cars and generators.

4. What are the advantages and disadvantages of reversible and non-reversible internal combustion engines?

The main advantage of a reversible engine is its ability to perform both work and heat transfer, making it more versatile for certain applications. However, reversible engines are more complex and expensive to build and maintain. Non-reversible engines, on the other hand, are simpler and less expensive, but they have limited functionality.

5. Are there any emerging technologies that combine the benefits of reversible and non-reversible internal combustion engines?

Yes, there are ongoing research and development efforts to create hybrid engines that combine the advantages of both reversible and non-reversible engines. These engines could potentially offer increased efficiency and versatility, but they are still in the early stages of development.

Similar threads

  • General Engineering
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
781
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
76
  • General Engineering
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
531
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
2
Views
597
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
1K
Back
Top