- #1
Suni
- 13
- 0
Hi all
Just a quick (relatively simple) question..
As high school physics/chem tought, a liquid of lower density will float uopn that of a higher density. This makes sense in most situations because of the pressure gradient in the higher-density liquid pushing the other fluid upwards. But what if we had a situation as so:
A low density liquid is sitting in a beaker. We then somehow place a high density liquid PERFECTLY upon the lower density so there is a point in time where the beaker would look like:
High density liquid
----------------- INTERFACE
Low density liquid
Now my question is what is it that would force the higher density liquid downwards? Because none of the liquid has actually penetrated into the low-density area yet (due to the interface) we can't use any pressure gradient differences. I was thinking it may have to do with Brownian motion causing a transfer of molecules across the interface which would eventually cause a total realisation of the pressure gradient. Does this make sense or is it wrong?
Thanks,
Dan
Just a quick (relatively simple) question..
As high school physics/chem tought, a liquid of lower density will float uopn that of a higher density. This makes sense in most situations because of the pressure gradient in the higher-density liquid pushing the other fluid upwards. But what if we had a situation as so:
A low density liquid is sitting in a beaker. We then somehow place a high density liquid PERFECTLY upon the lower density so there is a point in time where the beaker would look like:
High density liquid
----------------- INTERFACE
Low density liquid
Now my question is what is it that would force the higher density liquid downwards? Because none of the liquid has actually penetrated into the low-density area yet (due to the interface) we can't use any pressure gradient differences. I was thinking it may have to do with Brownian motion causing a transfer of molecules across the interface which would eventually cause a total realisation of the pressure gradient. Does this make sense or is it wrong?
Thanks,
Dan