- #1
physics_fun
- 28
- 0
Hey,
I'm working on a problem about the atomic form factor. I found that the atomic form factor of an fcc lattice of Buckyballs (C60 atoms) looks like f~(sin(Gr))/G multiplied bij some constants.
The question is now to explain from this atomic form factor why the (2,0,0) X-ray diffraction peak is much weaker (compared, for example, to the (1,1,1) peak).
I tried to put the numbers in, but every time I try this, I get (almost) the same answers for the two peaks...:(
What am I doing wrong?
edit: r=constant
I'm working on a problem about the atomic form factor. I found that the atomic form factor of an fcc lattice of Buckyballs (C60 atoms) looks like f~(sin(Gr))/G multiplied bij some constants.
The question is now to explain from this atomic form factor why the (2,0,0) X-ray diffraction peak is much weaker (compared, for example, to the (1,1,1) peak).
I tried to put the numbers in, but every time I try this, I get (almost) the same answers for the two peaks...:(
What am I doing wrong?
edit: r=constant