|Jul20-12, 12:34 PM||#1|
Hamilton's principle says that the action for the true path that a system follows will be stationary. As I understand it, the action is almost always least. Is there a reason why nature prefers least action rather over greatest action?
|Jul20-12, 12:53 PM||#2|
Hamilton's principle says that the action will be stationary but we can certainly say that it won't be a maximum because we can always increase S by taking a faster, wiggly path with T>>0 so you know it won't be a maximum.
However it could still be a saddle point but "Principle of stationary action" doesn't sound as cool as "Principle of Least Action"
|Similar Threads for: Least action|
|math with action script (Joukowski's + action script = HOW!!?!?!?)||Programming & Comp Sci||1|
|Variation in action for modified EM Field Action||Quantum Physics||2|
|New action is key to Loop gains (the Dittrich-Speziale action)||Beyond the Standard Model||6|
|action/reaction : if we do an action that requires energy of the whole universe||General Physics||2|
|What is the ACTION?||Special & General Relativity||6|