Why does the Schwinger parameter correspond to proper length?

by Dilatino
Tags: correspond, length, parameter, propagaor, proper, quantum field theory, schwinger
Dilatino is offline
Dec21-13, 03:30 PM
P: 5
I have just learned from nice article


that the propagator of a massive particle can be rewritten as an integral over the so-called Schwinger parameter t as

\frac{1}{p^2 + m^2} = \int\limits_0^\infty dt \exp(-t(p^2 + m^2))

In addition, in the blog article it is said that this Schwinger parameter p can be interpreted as the proper length of the propagator. I dont see this, so can somebody give a derivation/further explanation?
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Physicists design quantum switches which can be activated by single photons
'Dressed' laser aimed at clouds may be key to inducing rain, lightning
Higher-order nonlinear optical processes observed using the SACLA X-ray free-electron laser
Spinnor is offline
Dec21-13, 03:49 PM
P: 1,361
Using Wolfram Alpha,



integral from 0 to infinity of ( exp[-at])dt


fzero is offline
Dec21-13, 04:17 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
P: 2,606
There's a nice clear presentation of the argument given in the 1951 Schwinger paper at http://www.thetangentbundle.net/wiki...time_formalism. Post back if that doesn't help.

Register to reply

Related Discussions
Is proper length measured in the same reference frame as proper time. Introductory Physics Homework 0
How does the length contraction work for proper length? Special & General Relativity 8
Length contraction from lorentz transformation. Keep messing up the proper length Special & General Relativity 10
when we use arc length as a parameter Calculus 5
Basic Calculus III- Arc Length Parameter and Length- Getting a negative length Calculus & Beyond Homework 6