- #1
valeriy2222
- 14
- 0
Hi,
I'm concerned about one question about light interference.
It's said that light energy is redistributed during interference. That creates pattern. One slit or double slit interference create maximums and minimums on the screen where the interference takes place.
Now imagine a situation (look at the picture) where two beams interfering with each other under a certain angle and we have the region of interference (region A). Further down along the beams we have screens (B and C). Each of the screens placed in a way that one screen receives the light coming from one slit.
Being in the region of interference (region A) the beams should form an interference pattern thus redistributing the beams energy. The question is whether any pattern will be seen on screens A and B when the beams leave the interference region (consider uniform intensity distribution when the beams leave the slits).
[URL]http://img4.immage.de/2605940456untitled.png[/URL]
(Different colors represent nothing expect a better look)
I'm concerned about one question about light interference.
It's said that light energy is redistributed during interference. That creates pattern. One slit or double slit interference create maximums and minimums on the screen where the interference takes place.
Now imagine a situation (look at the picture) where two beams interfering with each other under a certain angle and we have the region of interference (region A). Further down along the beams we have screens (B and C). Each of the screens placed in a way that one screen receives the light coming from one slit.
Being in the region of interference (region A) the beams should form an interference pattern thus redistributing the beams energy. The question is whether any pattern will be seen on screens A and B when the beams leave the interference region (consider uniform intensity distribution when the beams leave the slits).
[URL]http://img4.immage.de/2605940456untitled.png[/URL]
(Different colors represent nothing expect a better look)
Last edited by a moderator: