New Reply

Easy Variation Question?

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Dec7-12, 10:30 AM   #1
 

Easy Variation Question?


I am considering the variation of

[itex] \delta ( \sqrt{g} R_{abcd} R^{abcd} ) [/itex]

and I know the answer is

[itex] - \frac12 \sqrt{g} g_{\mu\nu}R_{abcd} R^{abcd} +\sqrt{g} R_{( \mu}{}^{bcd} R_{\nu ) bcd} + \ldots [/itex]

what i do not understand is the coefficient of the last term. For example, when we evaluate the Maxwell Action

[itex] \sqrt{g} F_{ab} F^{ab} [/itex]

what we do is to write down as

[itex] \sqrt{g} g^{\mu\nu} g^{\alpha\beta} F_{\mu\alpha} F_{\nu\beta}[/itex]

so when we vary the action, we get

[itex] -\frac12 \sqrt{g} g_{\mu\nu} F^2 + 2 \sqrt{g} F_{(\mu}{}^{\sigma} F_{\nu ) \sigma}[/itex]

why is it not working with Riemann Tensor? How come there is no factor of 4 on the front of the last term in the variation of Riemann squared action?

Thanks in advance
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> Bird's playlist could signal mental strengths and weaknesses
>> Minus environment, patterns still emerge: Computational study tracks E. coli cells' regulatory mechanisms
>> Bacterium uses natural 'thermometer' to trigger diarrheal disease, scientists find
Dec7-12, 11:02 AM   #2
 
Blog Entries: 1
Recognitions:
Science Advisor Science Advisor
My reference (DeWitt's lectures) does have a factor of 4. Plus there are several terms involving the Ricci tensor.
Dec7-12, 11:05 AM   #3
 
Quote by Bill_K View Post
My reference (DeWitt's lectures) does have a factor of 4. Plus there are several terms involving the Ricci tensor.
do you have a link for these lecture notes?
Dec7-12, 11:38 AM   #4
 
Blog Entries: 1
Recognitions:
Science Advisor Science Advisor

Easy Variation Question?


Sorry, my mistake, the additional factor is 2 not 4. The reference is "Dynamical Theory of Groups and Fields", which is apparently not available online, although many libraries have it. Although DeWitt claims the calculation is easy, it is not! So let me quote his result in full (He must be using the opposite sign convention):

L3 ≡ √g RμνστRμνστ
δL3/δgμν = √g (4Rμνσ -2R;μν -2RμστρRνστρ +½gμνRστρλRστρλ -4RμσντRστ +4RμσRνσ)

Dec7-12, 11:43 AM   #5
 
Quote by Bill_K View Post
Sorry, my mistake, the additional factor is 2 not 4. The reference is "Dynamical Theory of Groups and Fields", which is apparently not available online, although many libraries have it. Although DeWitt claims the calculation is easy, it is not! So let me quote his result in full (He must be using the opposite sign convention):

L3 ≡ √g RμνστRμνστ
δL3/δgμν = √g (4Rμνσ -2R;μν -2RμστρRνστρ +½gμνRστρλRστρλ -4RμσντRστ +4RμσRνσ)

You are absolutely right about the factor of 2! i am sorry for the typo. but i still do not understand why the factor is not 4, but 2?
Dec7-12, 12:44 PM   #6
 
Blog Entries: 1
Recognitions:
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Without plowing through the algebra, only a vague comment. When you write FμνFμν = gμαgνβFμνFαβ you know you've factored out all the g-dependence, and it's easy to see there are two g's. But when you write RμνστRμνστ = gμαgνβgσγgτδRμνστRαβγδ, the R's still contain g-dependence, so it's not going to be just a factor of four.
New Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Easy Variation Question?
Thread Forum Replies
Proportion of total variation is accounted for by explained variation Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics 3
Variation question Calculus 5
Variation of masses in lead-acid battery due to H2SO4 mass variation Biology, Chemistry & Other Homework 5
variation in the action question General Physics 0
Genetic variation question Biology, Chemistry & Other Homework 2