About the origin of the universe? big bang cause?

In summary, the conversation discusses various theories and concepts related to the Big Bang and the origins of the universe. The main questions revolve around the cause of the Big Bang, the possibility of the universe being created from a black hole in another universe, and the accelerating expansion of the universe. The conversation also touches on the notion of time and how it is affected by the Big Bang. While there are different theories and speculations, the exact cause and nature of the Big Bang and the expansion of the universe remain unknown.
  • #1
jeebs
325
4
Hi,
I'm a physics student but I have not done much astronomy/cosmology. I was sitting here thinking, and something struck me. This thought is only a couple of minutes old so it's not much more than half-arsed musings at this stage. However, I am curious about whether someone who knows what they are talking about thinks idea this sounds plausible or nonsense, or whether this is already a known theory I am just ignorant of.

It's about the big bang, and what caused it. Was all the matter/energy of the universe supposed to have been concentrated all at once in one point, just sitting there and then exploding? Or, does it sound reasonable to suspect that maybe all the stuff is actually spewing from the singularity of some black hole in some other universe? Maybe the dawn of our time coincided with the collapse of some neutron star or something in this other universe?

Could this explain the apparent acceleration of the expansion of the universe? What I mean is, if this black hole is growing in this other universe, surely it's sucking in more and more stuff from there and blowing it all out here?
Do we have any other explanations of why the universe seems to be expanding?
Is the big bang even considered as still happening today?
Also, could this explain the way that we seem to have more matter than antimatter - because this black hole just happens to have formed in a region with less of the latter?

Most importantly, if this all seems possible, is there any conceivable way to test if it is true?

Apologies if any of this sounds naive, but I'd love to know about this.
Thanks.
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #2
Merely stating the physical state of the Universe at Big Bang is paradoxical because one encounters various infinities such as density infinities although I would find it interesting if Fuzzball's (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuzzballs) in Superstring Theory could help describe a Universe when it is in a state of Planck density. Your idea about Black Holes appears to be similar to Lee Smolin's idea but I'm not sure. We already know why the Universe is expanding, it is because of the existence of Dark Energy and inflation was likely caused by the emergence of some inflation field and particle, the Inflaton.
 
  • #3
Kevin_Axion said:
We already know why the Universe is expanding, it is because of the existence of Dark Energy and inflation was likely caused by the emergence of some inflation field and particle, the Inflaton.

oh, cool, I wasn't aware of this.
 
  • #4
1. It was not an explosion. It is a common misconception. Please read FAQ.
2. As there was no time before the Big bang (or at least the notion of Time can't be used in a form we got used to), the cause (event preceding smth in time) becomes ill-defined concept.
 
  • #5
Dmitry67 said:
2. As there was no time before the Big bang (or at least the notion of Time can't be used in a form we got used to), the cause (event preceding smth in time) becomes ill-defined concept.

Does this matter though? I mean, if a black hole suddenly formed and the first stuff started falling through, couldn't that be taken as the start of time? You wouldn't need to think of times earlier than that?
 
  • #6
No of course.
What you are suggesting is 'beginning of time by ignorance' – like as events before were irrelevant you can declare some moment of time as ‘beginning of time’. Big bang has completely different nature – you can’t continue time, even theoretically, to the moment before the Big Bang (I don’t want to talk at the moment about superstring theories)

Your very sentence states at least 2 events before your 'beginning of time'
Formation of the Black hole
Stuff (created when?) starting to fall inside
How can you can some moment 'the beginning of time' if there are events before it?
 
  • #7
Dmitry67 said:
Your very sentence states at least 2 events before your 'beginning of time'
Formation of the Black hole
Stuff (created when?) starting to fall inside
How can you can some moment 'the beginning of time' if there are events before it?

Sorry, what I meant was, this black hole forms in this other universe, which has plenty of previous time.

Or, let's say somewhere in our universe, a black hole has just formed right now. On the other side of that black hole, that new universe's time starts from zero?
Does this make any more sense?
 
  • #8
Black holes are super-dense objects that form a "singularity". Although the notion of a singularity is rather mundane because infinities are unreasonable and aren't very intuitive. I'm not sure what makes you posit that Universes form from Black Holes I'm quite certain the energy wouldn't be sustainable and Black Holes would have very distinct properties if this were true.
 
  • #9
jeebs said:
Sorry, what I meant was, this black hole forms in this other universe, which has plenty of previous time.

Or, let's say somewhere in our universe, a black hole has just formed right now. On the other side of that black hole, that new universe's time starts from zero?
Does this make any more sense?

While Schwarzschild solution is time symmetric (white hole and black hole + 'another side'), that solution is not realistic, because it is possible only with unrealistic boundary conditions - flat eternal universe. Realistic black holes don't have 'white hole' part and 'the other side' (negative radius space).
 
  • #10
well that's kicked my little theory into touch, lol.
 
  • #11
jeebs said:
It's about the big bang, and what caused it. Was all the matter/energy of the universe supposed to have been concentrated all at once in one point, just sitting there and then exploding?

No one really knows. There are several ideas for what happened "before" the big bang, but right now it's mostly speculation. It's interesting speculation, but it's speculation at this point.

Do we have any other explanations of why the universe seems to be expanding?

It turns out that a universe that obeys anything like general relativity just can't be static. So either the universe is expanding or it's contracting, and if it were contracting then the blue-shifted light from distant galaxies would fry us all.
 
  • #12
jeebs said:
well that's kicked my little theory into touch, lol.

On the other hand you can wave your hands and say that something weird happens in quantum gravity and that a collapsing black hole will create an inflationary bounce. Leo Smolin's cosmological natural selection is based on that idea.

It turns out that the hard part is not coming up with weird ideas. It's making weird ideas testable. One thing that we'll likely be able to do in the next decade is to have enough information about the cosmic microwave background to rule out some ideas.
 
  • #13

1. What is the Big Bang theory?

The Big Bang Theory is a scientific explanation for the origin of the universe. It states that the universe began as a singularity, a point of infinite density and temperature, and has been expanding and cooling ever since.

2. What caused the Big Bang?

The exact cause of the Big Bang is still unknown. Some theories suggest that it was caused by a quantum fluctuation, while others propose the idea of a multiverse where our universe is just one of many. However, it is important to note that the Big Bang does not necessarily need a cause as it may have been a spontaneous event.

3. How do scientists know about the Big Bang if it happened billions of years ago?

Scientists use various methods such as observations of cosmic microwave background radiation, the redshift of galaxies, and the abundance of light elements to support the Big Bang theory. These methods allow us to study the early stages of the universe and provide evidence for its rapid expansion.

4. Did the Big Bang create the universe?

The Big Bang did not create the universe but rather marked the beginning of its expansion. The concept of "creation" implies that there was a time before the universe existed, but the Big Bang suggests that time and space began with the universe itself.

5. Is the Big Bang theory accepted by all scientists?

The Big Bang theory is widely accepted by the scientific community as the most plausible explanation for the origin of the universe. However, there are still ongoing debates and research to further understand and refine our understanding of the Big Bang and the early universe.

Similar threads

I Why didn't the Big Bang form a Black Hole?
    • Cosmology
Replies
7
Views
876
I Could it be that the Big Bang had no cause?
    • Cosmology
Replies
3
Views
1K
I Big bang occuring everywhere vs everything "compressed"
    • Cosmology
Replies
16
Views
1K
I Questions about the Location of the Big Bang and the Age of the Universe
    • Cosmology
Replies
8
Views
522
I Shouldn't the Big bang be physically impossible?
    • Cosmology
Replies
25
Views
2K
I Question about the big bang singularity
    • Cosmology
Replies
13
Views
2K
I Big bang at the edges of the Universe?
    • Cosmology
Replies
25
Views
1K
B Age of Universe: Big Bang, Braneworlds & Perspective
    • Cosmology
Replies
22
Views
2K
I What Are the Origins of the Universe?
    • Cosmology
Replies
17
Views
2K
I Schwartzchild radius and the Big Bang
    • Cosmology
Replies
13
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top