Register to reply

Rules of Parity and Charge Conjugation Parity

by 1Kris
Tags: charge, conjugation, parity, rules
Share this thread:
1Kris
#1
Apr5-14, 05:27 AM
P: 22
I have two related questions to ask relating to statements found in introductory particle physics textbooks.

The first is that the "Dirac equation predicts fermions/anti-fermions have opposite intrinsic parity".
I have attempted to verify this by applying the parity transformation to free particle Dirac spinors using an explicit choice of representation. I find that it is true provided the particles are at rest but otherwise, they are not in a state of definite parity. This doesn't seem consistent with the quotation.

The second statement is that "fermion-antifermion pairs with total orbital angular momentum number L and total spin S, have a parity factor (-1)^(L+S) when interchanged". There is some reference to a minus sign appearing upon the interchange of antifermion with fermion which I have not been able to justify. Could anyone show me a detailed explanation of this factor please?

Thanks
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Cool calculations for cold atoms: New theory of universal three-body encounters
New method for non-invasive prostate cancer screening
How bubble studies benefit science and engineering
Bill_K
#2
Apr5-14, 05:15 PM
Sci Advisor
Thanks
Bill_K's Avatar
P: 4,160
Quote Quote by 1Kris View Post
I find that it is true provided the particles are at rest but otherwise, they are not in a state of definite parity.
That's correct.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
List of Charge Conjugation and Parity numbers High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics 3
The Parity Operator: Find the average value of the parity. Advanced Physics Homework 2
Parity switching wave functions for a parity invariant hamiltonian? Quantum Physics 2
Understanding parity and parity conservation High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics 0
Undergrad nuclear physics; spin parity rules Introductory Physics Homework 1