Choice between two grad math classes, DG vs. PDE

In summary, the individual is trying to decide between two graduate math classes for the fall, "Differentiable manifolds" and "Partial differential equations". They are unsure which one they are capable of handling and which would be more beneficial for their overall mathematical maturity. They have a math degree and some background in real analysis, complex variables, differential equations, topology, abstract algebra, and differential geometry. They are seeking advice on which class would be more useful for their future research in physics.
  • #1
mordechai9
205
0
I am trying to decide between two different graduate math classes in the fall. These are the only classes that sound really interesting to me, as well as fitting in with the rest of my schedule. My other courses will consist of several physics type courses, notably, Jackson's electrodynamics, intro to plasma physics, and intro to nuclear physics.

One is called "Differentiable manifolds", using the textbook "Comprehensive introduction to differential geometry, vol. 1", with a description like the following: "This course is the first introduction to differentiable manifolds. We will cover the basics: differentiable manifolds, vector bundles, implicit function theorem, submersions and immersions, vector fields and flows, foliations and Frobenius theorem, differential forms and exterior calculus, integration and Stokes' theorem, De Rham theory, etc. If time allows it, we will branch into Riemannian manifolds."

The second course is "Partial differential equations", using the textbook "Partial Differential Equations" by L. C. Evans. The description is: "This is an introductory course in partial differential equations. We will follow the textbook by L. C. Evans. The course will consist of the following parts: 1. Basic properties of solutions of Laplace's equation and the heat and wave equations. 2. Second order linear elliptic and parabolic equations: existence, regularity, maximum principles. 3. First order nonlinear PDE: introduction to Hamilton-Jacobi equations and conservation laws."

Both classes sound interesting and useful, but I'm a little bit unsure which one I'm actually capable of handling. Both of them sound pretty tough and I am a little bit worried about my background being sufficient. Both subjects are interesting and I am unsure which class would be better for my overall mathematical maturity at this point in time. Eventually I will be doing research in physics, but I think both classes would be helpful for my end goals.

My background is just having graduated with a math degree, completing the following math courses: Real analysis I (Intro to analysis), Real analysis II (Intro to Lebesgue integration, measure theory, limit theorems), complex variables, differential equations, topology, abstract algebra, linear algebra, curves and surfaces (intro to differential geometry)... and that's all. I think I may have a little deficiency in terms of finite dimensional vector spaces, or very rigorous calculus of multiple variables.

Any advice would be really appreciated...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
i guess you're a physics major? pdes will be much more useful but obviously dg will be necessary if you're interested in GR
 
  • #3


I would recommend carefully considering your goals and interests before making a decision between these two graduate math classes. Both Differential Geometry and Partial Differential Equations are important and useful fields of study, but they have different applications and may require different levels of mathematical maturity.

In terms of your background, it seems like you have a strong foundation in mathematics with courses in analysis, topology, and abstract algebra. However, as you have noted, you may have some deficiencies in finite dimensional vector spaces and rigorous calculus of multiple variables. It may be helpful for you to review these topics before beginning either course, as they are fundamental for both Differential Geometry and Partial Differential Equations.

In terms of choosing between the two classes, it may be helpful to consider your future research interests in physics. If you are interested in topics such as general relativity or differential geometry in physics, then the Differential Geometry course may be a better fit for you. On the other hand, if you are interested in topics such as fluid dynamics or quantum mechanics, then the Partial Differential Equations course may be more relevant.

Additionally, you may want to consider the teaching style and approach of each instructor and the textbooks being used. It may be helpful to speak with students who have taken these courses before or to meet with the instructors to discuss your concerns and determine which course may be a better fit for your mathematical background and goals.

Ultimately, both courses will likely be challenging and require a strong understanding of mathematics. Don't be afraid to challenge yourself and push your limits, but also be mindful of your own abilities and choose a course that will best support your academic and research goals. Good luck with your decision!
 

1. What is the difference between DG and PDE in terms of mathematical concepts?

DG (Discontinuous Galerkin) and PDE (Partial Differential Equations) are both mathematical methods used to solve differential equations. However, DG focuses on discontinuous spaces and uses a discontinuous basis for approximations, while PDE uses continuous spaces and a continuous basis for approximations. In simpler terms, DG allows for discontinuities in the solution while PDE assumes a smooth solution.

2. How do the applications of DG and PDE differ?

DG and PDE have different applications in mathematical models. DG is often used in problems with shocks or discontinuities, such as in fluid dynamics or electromagnetics. On the other hand, PDE is commonly used in problems with smooth solutions, such as in heat transfer or diffusion. The choice between DG and PDE depends on the type of problem being solved and the desired level of accuracy.

3. Which method is more computationally efficient, DG or PDE?

Both DG and PDE have their own advantages and disadvantages in terms of computational efficiency. DG requires more computational resources due to its use of discontinuous spaces, but it can handle problems with shocks or discontinuities more accurately. PDE, on the other hand, is computationally more efficient since it uses continuous spaces, but may not be as accurate in handling discontinuities. Overall, the choice between the two methods depends on the specific problem at hand and the available computational resources.

4. Can DG and PDE be used together in solving a problem?

Yes, DG and PDE can be combined in solving a problem, and this is known as a hybrid method. In this approach, DG is used in certain regions where discontinuities are present, while PDE is used in other regions with smooth solutions. This hybrid method can provide more accurate solutions compared to using DG or PDE alone.

5. What are some real-world applications of DG and PDE?

DG and PDE are widely used in various areas of science and engineering, such as fluid dynamics, electromagnetics, structural mechanics, and geophysics. For example, DG has been used to model shock waves in aerodynamics, while PDE has been used to simulate heat transfer in buildings. Both methods are also commonly used in the design and analysis of engineering systems, such as aircraft and spacecraft.

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
11
Views
658
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
16
Views
405
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
3
Views
948
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
1
Views
872
Back
Top