Register to reply

Raising to half power = PRINCIPAL square root?

by perishingtardi
Tags: complex, power, principal, raising, square
Share this thread:
perishingtardi
#1
Mar17-14, 12:25 PM
P: 21
This may seem like a very elementary question...but here goes anyway.

When a positive number is raised to the power 1/2, I have always assumed that this is defined as the PRINCIPAL (positive) square root, e.g. [tex]7^{1/2} = \sqrt{7},[/tex]. That is, it does not include both the positive and negative square rootsL [tex]7^{1/2} \neq -\sqrt{7} = -7^{1/2}.[/tex]

In complex analysis, however, this doesn't seem to be the case? E.g. we write [tex](-1)^{1/2} = \pm i.[/tex]

Have I understood these conventions correctly? I have also been thinking about a similar situation: how in real analysis we think of every positive number as having a single natural logarithm, e.g. [tex]\ln 2 = 0.693\dotsc,[/tex] when in fact there are actually infinitely many:
[tex]\ln 2 = 0.693\dotsc + 2\pi n i \qquad (n=0,\pm1,\pm2,\dots).[/tex]
Phys.Org News Partner Mathematics news on Phys.org
Professor quantifies how 'one thing leads to another'
Team announces construction of a formal computer-verified proof of the Kepler conjecture
Iranian is first woman to win 'Nobel Prize of maths' (Update)
micromass
#2
Mar17-14, 12:29 PM
Mentor
micromass's Avatar
P: 18,232
In real analysis, you are right to take the principal square root.

In complex analysis, things are a bit more complicated. You have two options here: either you take a multivalues approach where complex exponentiation and logarithms yield not one value but several ones. The other approach is still to take a principal logarithm and a principal exponent. I think the latter approach is more popular in introductory complex analysis texts.

See this too: http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=637214
HallsofIvy
#3
Mar17-14, 05:54 PM
Math
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 39,495
The difficulty is that, in the complex numbers, there is no way to unambiguously distinguish a particular root. In the real numbers we can show that, any positive number has, for n even, two nth roots, one positive and the other negative. So we can define the nth principle root to be the positive root. But the complex numbers do not form an ordered field so there is no way to distinguish the roots.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Finding the power series of a square root Calculus & Beyond Homework 4
F of G function question - Square root inside a square root? Precalculus Mathematics Homework 3
Does the principal branch square root of z have a Laurent series expansion C-{0}? Calculus & Beyond Homework 3
Laurent series for square root of square root Calculus 0
Notation for Principal Square Root? General Math 3