Nuclear Substitute for Optical Computing

[Plastic Photon]

I am not too well versed on computer engineering or nuclear chemistry.

If a photon can be substituted for the elctron in the logic process of computing (optical computing), why not use a radioactive element in decay emitting gamma rays in place of a photon? Disregard the harmful side effects.

I am not too sure if it is coherent enough, but if the idea of an optical computer is to transmit lgith waves, why not use smaller wavelengths such as the wavelength of the gamma ray?

 

[Astronuc]

Well it is a matter that gamma rays from a single atom are not predictable, i.e. each decay is a random event, and the direction of emission is also random.

In addition, gamma rays scatter from electrons in the atom from whose nucleus they are emitted, as well as the other atoms nearby.

So it's not a very well controlled process.

 

[ravenprp]

While the concept of using a radioactive element in place of a photon in optical computing may seem intriguing, it is important to consider the potential consequences and limitations of such a substitution. First and foremost, the use of a radioactive element would pose significant health and safety risks, making it an impractical choice for widespread use in computing technology.

Additionally, the wavelength of gamma rays may be smaller than that of photons, but it also carries much higher energy levels. This could lead to issues with stability and accuracy in the logic process, as well as potential damage to other components within the computer.

Furthermore, nuclear chemistry is a complex and highly regulated field, with strict protocols and regulations in place for the handling and disposal of radioactive materials. Incorporating such elements into computing technology would require extensive research and development, as well as significant resources and infrastructure.

In contrast, the use of photons in optical computing offers a more practical and safe approach. While there may be limitations in terms of bandwidth and speed, advancements in technology have allowed for significant improvements in optical computing and its capabilities. Therefore, it would be more beneficial to focus on furthering the development of photon-based computing rather than exploring the use of radioactive elements.

In conclusion, while the idea of a nuclear substitute for optical computing may seem appealing, it is not a feasible or responsible solution. The potential risks and limitations far outweigh any potential benefits, and it would be more productive to continue advancing the existing technology rather than introducing a new and potentially hazardous element.