Virtual Particles: Explained in Layman's Terms

In summary: See the cosmological constant problem.In summary, the article discusses the concept of forces being mediated by virtual particles, which helps to explain the invisible nature of fields in physics. Virtual photons are described as transferring momentum between charged bodies, and they differ from real photons in that they cannot be detected by a detector. All forces in quantum field theories are mediated by virtual particles, and while their existence is not directly verified by experiments, they are an important part of the mathematical calculations used in quantum mechanics. The propagation of virtual photons is considered to be faster than the speed of light, but this has no relation to quantum entanglement. The concept of virtual particles also applies to other phenomena such as electron-positron pairs and vacuum energy. However,
  • #1
GRB 080319B
108
0
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Quantum/virtual_particles.html

I am new to physics and have been struggling with the idea that forces are just "action at a distance" and that fields are invisible/incorporeal (can only be detected by the influence they exert) and permeate throughout all of space. The article above describes forces as being mediated by virtual particles, which made me feel more confident that fields were actually some form of matter/energy interaction. The virtual photons are apparently transferring momentum between charged bodies, but I got lost in the physics jargon as to how this ends up working. What are the similarities/differences between photons and virtual photons wrt the em field? I think one deal with a static field and one with a fluctuating field, but I'm not completely sure. Are all forces mediated by virtual particles? What experiments have verified that virtual particles exist? Further down in the article it states that the propagation of the virtual photons is ftl. Does this have anything to do with quantum entanglement? I've also heard of the virtual particles in reference to electron-positron pairs, Dirac sea, and zero point/ vacuum energy. Does this have anything to do with the above description or something completely different? I would greatly appreciate it if anyone could explain this virtual particle subject to me in layman's terms. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
GRB 080319B said:
The virtual photons are apparently transferring momentum between charged bodies, but I got lost in the physics jargon as to how this ends up working.
I don't think it's possible to explain how this "ends up working" without getting really deep into the mathematical stuff.

GRB 080319B said:
What are the similarities/differences between photons and virtual photons wrt the em field? I think one deal with a static field and one with a fluctuating field, but I'm not completely sure.
The biggest difference is that a real photon can make a detector click, but a real one can't. The only difference I can think of in addition to that is that virtual photons don't have to satisfy [itex]E^2=p^2c^2+m^2c^4[/itex]. (This implies that their speeds don't have to be c).

GRB 080319B said:
Are all forces mediated by virtual particles?
All forces in all quantum field theories. There is a QFT of gravity (hence "graviton") but it isn't very useful since it lacks a nice mathematical property called renormalizability.

GRB 080319B said:
What experiments have verified that virtual particles exist?
I could answer this with "none of them" as well as "all of them". Virtual particles show up in the mathematics when you expand a certain function in a series and consider each term separately. To say that virtual particles "exist" is equivalent to saying that the individual terms of that series describe what's "really happening", while the sum doesn't. I don't think there's any justification for that. Hence "none of them" is a reasonable answer to your question. However, they are a part of a method to calculate the probabilities of each possible result of any experiment, and these methods work extremely well. Every experiment that involves quantum mechanics in any way is evidence of that. Even the existence of stable atoms is evidence of that. Hence "all of them" is also a reasonable answer to your question.

Personally, I don't think of virtual particles as a description of what's really happening. I think of them as a part of the easiest way to do calculations.

GRB 080319B said:
Further down in the article it states that the propagation of the virtual photons is ftl.
When you do the calculations I talked about you're supposed to integrate over the momentum, so all speeds up to infinity are included.

GRB 080319B said:
Does this have anything to do with quantum entanglement?
No.

GRB 080319B said:
I've also heard of the virtual particles in reference to electron-positron pairs, Dirac sea, and zero point/ vacuum energy. Does this have anything to do with the above description or something completely different?
Forget about the Dirac sea. It's an old model that's been replaced by quantum field theories.

The calculation method I mentioned also includes virtual particles popping in and out of existence in the vacuum. This is sometimes mentioned as an explanation for a non-zero density of vacuum. I'm not sure I like that explanation though. The result of the calculation is that the density of vacuum is infinite. If we try to guess a cutoff energy and only include smaller energies than the cutoff in the integrals, the result is still many orders of magnitude too high. If we take the cutoff to be the Planck scale, the result is a ridiculous 120 orders of magnitude too large.
 
  • #3


First of all, don't worry if you're feeling overwhelmed by all the physics jargon - it can be a lot to take in! But let's break down the concept of virtual particles in simpler terms.

In short, virtual particles are particles that pop in and out of existence in the quantum world. They are not physical particles like the ones we are familiar with, but rather they are fluctuations in the fields that permeate throughout space. These fields are essentially invisible forces that interact with particles and give them their properties, such as mass and charge.

One way to think about it is like a sea of particles constantly fluctuating and creating temporary "ripples" in the fields. These ripples can interact with other particles, transferring energy and momentum between them. This is how forces are mediated - the virtual particles act as messengers between particles, carrying the force from one to the other.

Now, you mentioned the similarities and differences between photons and virtual photons. Photons are the physical particles that make up light and electromagnetic radiation. Virtual photons, on the other hand, are the fluctuations in the electromagnetic field that mediate the electromagnetic force between charged particles. So while they both involve the same type of field, they are different in that photons are physical particles while virtual photons are not.

Not all forces are mediated by virtual particles, but the electromagnetic and strong nuclear forces are. The weak nuclear force is mediated by a different type of virtual particle called the W and Z bosons.

As for experiments that have verified the existence of virtual particles, there have been various experiments in quantum electrodynamics (QED) that have shown the effects of virtual particles. For example, the Lamb shift and the Casimir effect are both phenomena that can be explained by the presence of virtual particles.

The statement about virtual photons propagating faster than light is referring to their "off-shell" nature, meaning they do not follow the usual rules of particles traveling at the speed of light. This does not have anything to do with quantum entanglement.

Finally, the mention of virtual particles in relation to electron-positron pairs, Dirac sea, and zero-point energy is all connected. These are different ways of conceptualizing the presence of virtual particles in the quantum world. The idea of a Dirac sea, for example, suggests that the vacuum of space is filled with virtual particles constantly popping in and out of existence.

I hope this helps to clarify the concept of virtual particles for you. It is a complex
 

1. What are virtual particles?

Virtual particles are particles that are predicted by the laws of quantum mechanics to exist for very short periods of time, typically less than a nanosecond. They are not particles in the traditional sense, but rather fluctuations in energy that behave like particles.

2. How are virtual particles different from regular particles?

Virtual particles are different from regular particles in that they do not have a definite mass or location, and they cannot be directly observed or measured. They also do not obey the laws of classical physics, but instead follow the rules of quantum mechanics.

3. How do virtual particles come into existence?

Virtual particles come into existence as a result of the uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics. This principle states that there is a limit to how precisely we can know the properties of a particle, and this uncertainty allows for the creation of virtual particles.

4. What is the role of virtual particles in the universe?

Virtual particles play a crucial role in many physical phenomena, including the behavior of subatomic particles and the creation of Hawking radiation from black holes. They also help to explain the fundamental forces of nature, such as the strong and weak nuclear forces.

5. Can virtual particles become real particles?

Yes, virtual particles can become real particles under certain conditions. For example, in particle accelerators, high-energy collisions can cause virtual particles to become real particles. Additionally, in some cases, virtual particles can interact with real particles and have observable effects on their behavior.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Physics
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
3
Views
766
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
15
Views
840
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
881
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
744
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • Quantum Physics
2
Replies
36
Views
1K
Back
Top