Let's Talk About Energy Sources

In summary: We need to find ways to store this energy so that it can be used later.I want to know more about why people have such a negative view of nuclear power, I mean obviously because of nuclear accidents and the problem of spent fuel storage, but I am a firm believer that we can solve any problem thrown at us. I believe that we can reduce the chance of having a nuclear accident to make it so insignificant that it would be crazy not to have nuclear power as, at least, a reliable supplement to other forms of energy production. I have read of so many innovations in nuclear power production, e.g. thorium fueled reactors, better reactor design. But everyone is afraid of it. What say others?I
  • #1
Seth0Mitchell
25
0
I'm curious to know what you all think of the future of energy. What type of energy do you think has the most promise for the future? What role do you think the various engineering disciplines will play?

I'm really looking forward to the future of this whole antimatter factor haha.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
OK Let's talk.
What do you think will be the role of, picking one, oil, as an energy source in the future?
 
  • #3
Antimatter factory? No such thing exists nor are there any plans for one. The thing is with antimatter is that it takes more energy to produce it than it gives (though it would be an almost perfect medium for energy storage).

Considering the problems of future peak oil I would expect to see a necessary change in cultural attitudes reducing energy consumption alongside; increases in gas and coal usage, investment in renewables and construction of more nuclear reactors.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
By far the biggest piece of our energy future will have to be nuclear power.
 
  • #5
russ_watters said:
By far the biggest piece of our energy future will have to be nuclear power.
This is a reason why I am extremely jealous of the French, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_power_in_France" [Broken] mean that when we actually need to invest in fossil fuel alternatives it will take years to even get started.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #6
Has to be nuclear, we need to get over the mistrust of it as a fuel source.
 
  • #7
The only real player, at this stage is nuclear. The Germans seem to have a neat trick that may change a lot though. I read that they are working on scalable technology to use excess power to generate natural gas from Water(hydrogen) and CO2.
Man made Natural gas, may be the missing storage piece that could push alternate energy devices over the hump. The real problem with most of the alternative energy methods, is their inconsistency. The wind does not always blow, and the sun does not always shine. Separating the energy capture from the energy demand with a storage medium. The infrastructure is already in place to distribute natural gas, and we can already convert transport to run on it. One additional thing, If I can make methane, making more complex hydrocarbons may not be out of the question.
 
  • #8
Also, a way of producing hydrogen cheaply and efficently to run our cars on. Anybody heard of any exciting new prospects in this field?
 
  • #9
I want to know more about why people have such a negative view of nuclear power, I mean obviously because of nuclear accidents and the problem of spent fuel storage, but I am a firm believer that we can solve any problem thrown at us. I believe that we can reduce the chance of having a nuclear accident to make it so insignificant that it would be crazy not to have nuclear power as, at least, a reliable supplement to other forms of energy production. I have read of so many innovations in nuclear power production, e.g. thorium fueled reactors, better reactor design. But everyone is afraid of it. What say others?
 
  • #10
Use of solar power to produce hydrogen..

The tech is already in place (in Canada), but is xpensive..

But i stroingly believe it'll take over in near future..
 
  • #11
moogull said:
I want to know more about why people have such a negative view of nuclear power, I mean obviously because of nuclear accidents and the problem of spent fuel storage, but I am a firm believer that we can solve any problem thrown at us. I believe that we can reduce the chance of having a nuclear accident to make it so insignificant that it would be crazy not to have nuclear power as, at least, a reliable supplement to other forms of energy production. I have read of so many innovations in nuclear power production, e.g. thorium fueled reactors, better reactor design. But everyone is afraid of it. What say others?

I suppose this spins out of the notion that there are other alternatives (wind, solar, & hydro) that don't have the environmental issues offsetting them. People who haven't studied these things assume that they can be used in the same way gas, coal, and uranium is; to make electricity. Unfortunately, they just aren't competititve. Wind works really well in some areas, but that's rare.
 
  • #12
chetanladha said:
Use of solar power to produce hydrogen..

The tech is already in place (in Canada), but is xpensive..

But i stroingly believe it'll take over in near future..

Why not just convert strictly to electricity? Why use the H2 as an energy carrier? If you mean for mobile/auto than why not batteries?
 
  • #13
Mr Boom said:
Why not just convert strictly to electricity? Why use the H2 as an energy carrier? If you mean for mobile/auto than why not batteries?

Electricity needs to be used less than a second after it is created, otherwise it just goes to waste.
 

What are the different types of energy sources?

There are several types of energy sources, including fossil fuels (coal, oil, and natural gas), nuclear energy, renewable energy (solar, wind, hydro, geothermal, and biomass), and alternative energy (such as nuclear fusion and hydrogen fuel).

What is the most commonly used energy source?

Fossil fuels are the most commonly used energy source, accounting for about 80% of global energy consumption. This is because they are relatively cheap and abundant, but they also have negative environmental impacts.

Why is it important to discuss energy sources?

It is important to discuss energy sources because our current energy consumption patterns are not sustainable and have negative impacts on the environment. It is crucial to find alternative and renewable sources of energy to reduce our carbon footprint and mitigate climate change.

What are the advantages of using renewable energy sources?

Renewable energy sources have several advantages, including being clean and renewable, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and promoting energy independence and security. They also have the potential to create new jobs and stimulate economic growth in the renewable energy industry.

What can individuals do to support the use of renewable energy sources?

Individuals can support the use of renewable energy sources by making small changes in their daily lives, such as using energy-efficient appliances, reducing energy consumption, and supporting policies and initiatives that promote the use of renewable energy. They can also invest in renewable energy companies and advocate for renewable energy in their communities.

Similar threads

  • General Engineering
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • General Engineering
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
881
  • General Engineering
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • General Engineering
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
3
Views
449
Back
Top